Page 1 of 2

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 15:04
by dempseyfire
Those lists have all sorts of problems.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 15:06
by Nile4000
Greg Page was a very, underrated hitter.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 15:08
by SaadOffTheDeck
Corbett.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 15:10
by Nile4000
John Ruiz.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 19:14
by yancey
Too bad we can't ask Ingo and 'Enery about Patterson's punching power.

You think Tunney would have made as big an impression on them?

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 01 Apr 2014, 23:50
by The End
Clay's power getting a little underrated here

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 00:16
by DaveyMac
What a load of crap.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 03:52
by Heartbreak_Kid79
I'm amazed that Foreman isn't touted as 'the hardest hitter' in the pre 1982 list

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 07:09
by palooka
Willard and Fitzsimmons didn't ought to be the list; Mike Weaver and BoneCrusher Smith surely hit harder.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 07:17
by palooka
I'm not sold on Dempsey hitting harder than Foreman at all; there was talk of loaded gloves for the Willard bout. If Foreman had used loaded gloves he'd have killed someone outright.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 07:26
by Syntax Error
BarryWashington wrote:
BarryWashington wrote:Punch for punch, Bruno probably hit the hardest
Of the post '78 bunch
Harder than Mike Tyson or Lennox Lewis?

I'd have to disagree with that: Frank Bruno never even floored a world class opponent, let alone knocked one out.

All truly great punchers have a some world class scalps on their resumes.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 07:35
by palooka
Walcott at number 15 out of 31 champions? He was more than a median hitter, he hit terrible with either hand.

(I appreciate it is difficult making lists like this).

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 08:23
by palooka
Il Duce wrote:
palooka wrote:Walcott at number 15 out of 31 champions? He was more than a median hitter, he hit terrible with either hand.

(I appreciate it is difficult making lists like this).
Look at Jersey Joe Walcott a little closer.

From the start of his career thru August 1946 {Age; 32 years, 7 months}

He was 41-9-2 {27 KO's}, that was a 66% KO-Rate.
Cheers for replying; the bare statistics do not make a concrete argument always. Walcott dropped and hurt many excellent fighters; the hook that he flattened Charles with was brutal; knocking out or stopping 2 thirds of the men he faced is some going; he boxed some good men.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 10:00
by Vladimir5555
Chris Byrd

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 10:26
by bodyblow999
Tommy Burns? He was a big puncher. Only one guy went the distance with him as champ until Johnson.

Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions

Posted: 02 Apr 2014, 11:17
by Ambling Alp II
Actually, the 1982 to now list is not bad. The first list obviously total BS.