BoxRec

Probably their worst yet.

Biased rubbish.

Jesus Lord, just when you think Sky can't get any worse, they top it off with this.

Edit: Anthony Crolla, Heavyweight?

Horse wrote:Probably their worst yet.

Biased rubbish.

Not as bad as yours

taffytoon wrote:Not as bad as yours

Insults work better when they are realistic.

Horse wrote:

taffytoon wrote:Not as bad as yours

Insults work better when they are realistic.

You smell like piss.

DMA1987 wrote:You smell like piss.

That's mean.

WTF at Quigg's position

Horse doesn't have anything that bad.

They must have an option on murray.

Scott Quigg

No fury or chisora? Or cleverly ? Utter tosh

the truth wrote:No fury or chisora? Or cleverly ? Utter tosh

Clev will enter into the top five once he has boxed at least once for Matchroom. Those are the rules.

That's the worst I have ever seen.. Ricky Burns at 8.. 2 or 3.. Quigg is a paper champ and Frampton has beaten the better Guys.. Fury is undefeated with wins over Cunningham and Chisora..

daviddee wrote:That's the worst I have ever seen.. Ricky Burns at 8.. 2 or 3.. Quigg is a paper champ and Frampton has beaten the better Guys.. Fury is undefeated with wins over Cunningham and Chisora..

I don't mind Ricky moving down, he hasn't performed for 18 months now, but Jamie McDonnell above him?

Sky's shite & so is boxing news I stopped paying for both years ago

I always wonder how and who comes up with these rating from these networks or news channels? Is there one guy in charge or do they discuss it or vote? How do they come up with such shit.

Not having Fury is stupid but having Quigg 2nd and Frampton 9th is an insult.

Hey my s h i t was changed to p o o. WTF