Page 1 of 2

Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 02:07
by lefty
Set for Toowoomba July 4th. Not sure this is particularily good idea but best of luck to the both of them http://www.BS.com/michael-kats ... y-4--77304

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 02:43
by ShadrachSimmo
Katsidis should stop Earl in 1 then hopefully it's over for both of them as far as fighting goes.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 02:43
by jessi
I'm sure this was talked about last year, can't believe it actually might happen, Earl could seriously get hurt.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 03:36
by london
Crazy. Kastdidis confirmed the fight on his twitter. At least Earl wont be rusty he last fought 5 years ago!

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 03:52
by crusader
So much shot in one ring.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 04:11
by Bard of Boxrec
Saddening

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 04:11
by Yes We Can
Hopefully both men get paid well & nobody gets hurt.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 04:18
by danconnollyeire
I thought Katsidis couldn't fight again??

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 05:22
by Manchester Hitman
Hopefully the fight will fall through

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 07:02
by Lenny
Hoping this will just be a glorified sparring session. Can't really understand why some people have been so keen to get this rematch on, is it something anyone wants to see?

Never understood anyone wanting to watch these Maske v Hill, Fenech v Nelson type rematches years later. Especially when a guy like Earl has never been more than a decent domestic class boxer who had looked dangerously shot in his last fights

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 07:31
by danconnollyeire
Lenny wrote:Hoping this will just be a glorified sparring session. Can't really understand why some people have been so keen to get this rematch on, is it something anyone wants to see?

Never understood anyone wanting to watch these Maske v Hill, Fenech v Nelson type rematches years later. Especially when a guy like Earl has never been more than a decent domestic class boxer who had looked dangerously shot in his last fights
Yep :TU: I was never Keen on a Bhop-Jones Jr rematch after Jones had been beaten easily a few times. Just a name vs a name

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 09:29
by Taansend
danconnollyeire wrote:
Lenny wrote:Hoping this will just be a glorified sparring session. Can't really understand why some people have been so keen to get this rematch on, is it something anyone wants to see?

Never understood anyone wanting to watch these Maske v Hill, Fenech v Nelson type rematches years later. Especially when a guy like Earl has never been more than a decent domestic class boxer who had looked dangerously shot in his last fights
Yep :TU: I was never Keen on a Bhop-Jones Jr rematch after Jones had been beaten easily a few times. Just a name vs a name
The Leonard Hearns rematch was pretty tasty though :box:

But back on topic, how the fornicate are they going to sell this fight? Can you imagine Earl at the press conference? "Yeah well since the first war I've prepared for the rematch by getting knocked out in the first round twice & then beating a bloke with a 16-125-7 record. But I've had a 1,832 day training camp so I'm raring to go."

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 09:39
by lefty
Taansend wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:
Lenny wrote:Hoping this will just be a glorified sparring session. Can't really understand why some people have been so keen to get this rematch on, is it something anyone wants to see?

Never understood anyone wanting to watch these Maske v Hill, Fenech v Nelson type rematches years later. Especially when a guy like Earl has never been more than a decent domestic class boxer who had looked dangerously shot in his last fights
Yep :TU: I was never Keen on a Bhop-Jones Jr rematch after Jones had been beaten easily a few times. Just a name vs a name
The Leonard Hearns rematch was pretty tasty though :box:

But back on topic, how the eff are they going to sell this fight? Can you imagine Earl at the press conference? "Yeah well since the first war I've prepared for the rematch by getting knocked out in the first round twice & then beating a bloke with a 16-125-7 record. But I've had a 1,832 day training camp so I'm raring to go."
:lol: ... i'm guessing they're going to sell it purely on the back of the exciting nature of the first encounter. That's ignoring the fact that they're both completely shot to pieces now.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 11:36
by Final round
You've said it all on this fight..

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 12:58
by Datsue
Taansend wrote:
The Leonard Hearns rematch was pretty tasty though :box:
Whilst I concur that the Leonard-Hearns rematch was pretty tasty, they were both champs in the same division (though Tommy got stripped iirc), they weren't both coming off horrendous shellackings/long periods of absence from the ring, & more importantly they were both the right side of forty. They were diminished, true, but they weren't shot to fvck.

I don't really think that one compares, meself.
But back on topic, how the eff are they going to sell this fight? Can you imagine Earl at the press conference? "Yeah well since the first war I've prepared for the rematch by getting knocked out in the first round twice & then beating a bloke with a 16-125-7 record. But I've had a 1,832 day training camp so I'm raring to go."
However, this part of your post made me piss myself laughing. Giving the matter more thought than it perhaps deserves, it occurs to me I'd be tempted to fork over money for a PPV if a mush turned up at a press conference for a high-ish profile fight & sat there going "Well, I'm only here for the money, really, my missus has taken me for all I had, & I've spent the last of my fortune on cheap cocaine & expensive hookers, & now I need some money to pay to get my monkey back out of escrow."

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 13:44
by Broomhall
I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 16:22
by Teddy's Toupee
Broomhall wrote:I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.
Darts?

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 17:28
by ShadrachSimmo
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
Broomhall wrote:I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.
Darts?
:salut:

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 17:35
by littlepug
Didn't they become good mates after with katsidis staying at earls house before the Mitchell fight ?

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 17:45
by Broomhall
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
Broomhall wrote:I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.
Darts?
Good shout

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 18:35
by iamasadlittleboy
danconnollyeire wrote:I thought Katsidis couldn't fight again??
He recently fought an Indonesian "bum" called Eddy Comaro. Comaro was a hand picked fighter who didn't have much power (11 KO's in around 50 bouts) and had won just 2 of his previous 9.

Whether he should be in the ring is a different matter though.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 01 May 2014, 20:26
by Taansend
Datsue wrote:
Taansend wrote:
The Leonard Hearns rematch was pretty tasty though :box:
Whilst I concur that the Leonard-Hearns rematch was pretty tasty, they were both champs in the same division (though Tommy got stripped iirc), they weren't both coming off horrendous shellackings/long periods of absence from the ring, & more importantly they were both the right side of forty. They were diminished, true, but they weren't shot to fvck.

I don't really think that one compares, meself.

Hello Datsue,

My Hearns Leonard rematch was in response to 'Lenny' typing this "Never understood anyone wanting to watch these Maske v Hill, Fenech v Nelson type rematches years later.".

I wasn't comparing it to this particular bout. Just mentioning that the Hearns Leonard rematch was a good one.

Of course, Leonard is in many peoples Top Ten P4P & Hearns in many peoples Top Ten P4P Exciting list.

Katsidis is definitely my favourite fighter named Katsidis and Graham Earl has had that amazing training camp so....... :KO:

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 02 May 2014, 03:34
by Datsue
Broomhall wrote:I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.

I know pro wrestling isn't really a sport, but all its competitors seem to keel over due to a combination of drug-induced heart attacks, long-term steroid abuse, mental illness due to ring injuries & long-term recreational & steroid abuse, & being about 5 stone over a "natural" weight.

I know it doesn't have the gloomy misery of boxing greats shuffling their last in rented rooms, reduced to wrinkled & forgotten shadows of their former selves, dementia & infirmity laying them waste, & all these giant orange people's hearts exploding may at first glance have some inherent comedy value, but when you see a list like this it does bring it home that their "sport" is completely fvcked too:

http://prowrestling.about.com/od/whatsr ... deaths.htm

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 02 May 2014, 03:39
by lefty
Datsue wrote:
Broomhall wrote:I often wonder if there is another sport which makes its competitors such tragic figures. So many of these guys end up broke and with dementia or some other brain injury.

I know pro wrestling isn't really a sport, but all its competitors seem to keel over due to a combination of drug-induced heart attacks, long-term steroid abuse, mental illness due to ring injuries & long-term recreational & steroid abuse, & being about 5 stone over a "natural" weight.

I know it doesn't have the gloomy misery of boxing greats shuffling their last in rented rooms, reduced to wrinkled & forgotten shadows of their former selves, dementia & infirmity laying them waste, & all these giant orange people's hearts exploding may at first glance have some inherent comedy value, but when you see a list like this it does bring it home that their "sport" is completely fvcked too:

http://prowrestling.about.com/od/whatsr ... deaths.htm
Professional sportsmen/women in general quite often seem to end up in a shitty situation at some point after their careers are over. I read the other day that ex cricketers have the highest rate of suicide amongst athletes. That was pretty surprising. I wonder why that is.

Re: Michael Katsidis vs Graham Earl rematch

Posted: 02 May 2014, 08:06
by stujones
I think Earl needs the fight for his own piece of mind. I think the stoppage grates him and he needs closure. Hopefully the fight will be decisive either way so Earl can have closure.