Page 1 of 2
if Ricky Hatton was on BBC - Would they show live at 9pm?
Posted: 20 May 2004, 07:53
by knockout artist
At the mo, all the Beebs shows go out delayed at 11.30ish. Far too late in my opinion.
According, to some reports Hatton is upset at certain announcements about his opposition.
If the Beeb could get Ricky, do you think they would put their shows on live, Saturday nights?
Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:29
by J
undoutedly. I hope this will happen
It could be the best thing that has happened to boxing in the uk for years in terms of raising the profile of the sport.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:31
by knockout artist
It HAS to happen, for boxings sake.
Just think of the interest it would generate for the average man on the street.
It would get Boxing competeing for column inches in the papers.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:32
by buzz
who gives a shit???????

Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:37
by J
buzz wrote:who gives a shit???????

biyt of callous comment that, woudl be great for the sport.
Love him or loathe hatton is household name.
the only way to get more boxing on the tiv is to get the non die hards involved and this would do that.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:38
by knockout artist
buzz wrote:who gives a shit???????

People who care about the sport, who feel its profile and popularity should be much better.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 08:52
by Loftgroov
Sorry.... but who gives a shit?
Posted: 20 May 2004, 09:05
by J
aaaw come on just cos its hatton.
You should give a shit if you care bout the sport in my opinion.
Like it or lump it he is the most famous name in brit boxing at present to the layman.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 09:31
by jamesmcdonnell
Actually, I would disagree, there are a lot of non-boxing fans who don't know who Hatton is.
Audley Harrison is probably better known to the average bod on the street, Olympic medals really do create a stir.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 09:46
by J
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Actually, I would disagree, there are a lot of non-boxing fans who don't know who Hatton is.
Audley Harrison is probably better known to the average bod on the street, Olympic medals really do create a stir.
possibly but most men in the street also dismiss Audley immidiately due to his boasts and lost interest in his perfromances some time ago, while hatton is still seen as the real thing by the afroesaid man in street.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 09:50
by REAL_DEAL
BBC have a terrible attitude towards boxing, they dont even show harrison on a early time, so i doubt they would with hatton either
Posted: 20 May 2004, 09:51
by stujones
REAL_DEAL wrote:BBC have a terrible attitude towards to boxing, they dont even show harrison on a early time, so i doubt they would with hatton either
Yes, I am afraid that is true. At least ITV knew how to handle boxing.
Posted: 20 May 2004, 17:01
by neil r
signing hatton wouldnt make any difference. The beeb did have the highest profiled name in the sport ie Harrison and look at the way they have treated boxing just now. In the eyes of the public at large Aubrey is the highest profile out there, not Hatton, who im sure the majority of armchair casual fans have never heard off.
so signing Hatton , as unlikely as that is wouldnt mean the bbc would raise the stakes in the prestenting times, style etc. at least certainly not in the long term.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 10:11
by jamesmcdonnell
Having said that, Hatton would be a WAY bigger name had all his fights been on the BBC from the start, the guy would be a major sporting star by now.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 10:43
by J
i think you underestimate how well known he is amongst the general public, though it could just b that most of my mates have been bored to death by me about him so are bound to know his name

Posted: 21 May 2004, 10:49
by jamesmcdonnell
Well most people I speak to, who are sports fans, but don't follow boxing closely, have never heard of him.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 10:52
by DOG
More people would know him as that bloke who came last in Superstars, rather than the UK's best "prospect", sorry Worlds Champion

Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:07
by buzz
Its true, more people know of Carl Froch than Ricky Hatton. The Beeb seem to have a much bigger audience.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:17
by jamesmcdonnell
Having said that, realistically, I doubt whether the BBC would have been able to show Ricky's fights live, it's not like they've shown all of any other of 'their' fighters live every time is it.
Boxing just isn't mainstream enough.
I wish the BBC would set up a boxing channel.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:22
by Loftgroov
Quite true James.
Sadly evening re-runs of some shitty sitcom draw more viewers than a Ricky Hatton fight would... and thats all the BBC would care about.
All our opinions and wants are as boxing fans and fanatics... we just have to accept that "most people" don't feel the same about boxing as we do.
There are bound to be some hockey & netball fanatics etc out there... and what coverage of their sport do they get??? We should count ourselves lucky really.

Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:33
by J
Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:39
by Loftgroov
I hear you man

Posted: 21 May 2004, 11:41
by jamesmcdonnell
Someone explain to me why there is so much fornicating Nascar, Baseball and Ice Hockey on late at night, how many people give a flying nun's chuffbox about any of those sport.
My guess is they are dirt cheap, and as they figure the only people watching are students and weed-smoking dossers, there isn't much point spending any money on the late late shift time slot.
Posted: 21 May 2004, 12:00
by J
think you explained it yourself mate to be fair!
Posted: 21 May 2004, 12:03
by buzz
DOG wrote:More people would know him as that bloke who came last in Superstars, rather than the UK's best "prospect", sorry Worlds Champion

Could you really see Judah, Mitchell, Mayweather, Cotto, Witter or Harris coming last on Superstars.
Neither can I.
