Thomas Hearns vs Paul Williams ?
Posted: 22 May 2014, 13:32
At 47,54,and 60,how would it have panned out between these two very tall lanky reachy heavy hitters ?
I feel at 147 it would've been probably likely overall the best weight as far as overall competitevness.
But then again,it might've been equally great at 154 and 160 based on styles. Williams's southpaw stance and phenomenal reach could've had Hearns's nuimber,at least to some degree.
Anyway,I see a very competitive fight at 147,probably goes the distance and one or the other wins by a SD.
At 154,i see Hearns taking it by Tko between rounds 7 and 9.
At 160,probably more competitive than at Hearns's best weight of 154. Likely Hearns by relatively close UD at 160.
I feel at 147 it would've been probably likely overall the best weight as far as overall competitevness.
But then again,it might've been equally great at 154 and 160 based on styles. Williams's southpaw stance and phenomenal reach could've had Hearns's nuimber,at least to some degree.
Anyway,I see a very competitive fight at 147,probably goes the distance and one or the other wins by a SD.
At 154,i see Hearns taking it by Tko between rounds 7 and 9.
At 160,probably more competitive than at Hearns's best weight of 154. Likely Hearns by relatively close UD at 160.