FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
"Last weekend Carl Froch emphatically retained his WBA and IBF super-middleweight belts by ironing out George Groves in the eighth round of their grudge return.
It was a fantastic event with a crackling atmosphere, garnished by a savage finish from Froch. However, in contrast to their sizzler last November, it was a very cautious affair with both exchanging punches from long range and the lack of sustained exchanges brought ridiculous booing from some of the live audience on occasions.
Groves got his tactics wrong and lost the contest but he's up there alongside Chris Eubank when it comes to self-promotion.
It was 'The Saint' who forced the IBF into ordering a rematch that Froch stated he had no interest in, instead Froch wanted to up his game and fight in Las Vegas against Julio Cesar Chavez Jnr. But rather than relinquish his title, Froch showed Howard Foster was right the first time. And it was Groves who helped galvanise the huge live gate and high pay-per-view take up.
At 26, he's still young, but as Froch stated after the fight, he felt him breathing heavily in the 6th round. The deficient stamina again brought his downfall. He might now consider drafting a letter of apology to maligned referee Howard Foster whose controversial intervention in November probably saved him from being similarly stretched last time.
The event was brilliant for the game but Groves isn't in the Benn, Eubank, Calzaghe class, they won world titles and were proven world champions.
As for Groves' coach Paddy Fitzpatrick, who it emerged last week had lost all of his five professional fights under an alias which surprised a lot of people in the business, but was ultimately exposed. Fitzpatrick certainly warrants reprimand for extremely irresponsible comments associating Froch and death in the ring during the build up and certainly for the ridiculous letter he sent to the BBBofC stating he feared for Froch's life.
Froch, who said himself that he's not a one punch finisher, fought a smart, sensible fight, dictated the tempo and concluded the action with one of the best finishes in a British ring.
Expect him to leave mandatory challenger James DeGale standing at the altar whilst he pursues his dream of fighting under the neon lights of Las Vegas and fattening his wallet in a US pay-per-view event with Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. HBO Sports boss Ken Hershman was an ominous presence at ringside.
To witness close to 80,000 cram into Wembley Stadium, and see boxing again dominating the back pages of the national press, not only provided a tremendous boost for our sport but delivered a solid thump into the protective cup of all the naysayers who whinge that the fight game is in terminal decline.
Boxing in Britain has seldom been more alive. Tune in tonight and see for yourself."
It was a fantastic event with a crackling atmosphere, garnished by a savage finish from Froch. However, in contrast to their sizzler last November, it was a very cautious affair with both exchanging punches from long range and the lack of sustained exchanges brought ridiculous booing from some of the live audience on occasions.
Groves got his tactics wrong and lost the contest but he's up there alongside Chris Eubank when it comes to self-promotion.
It was 'The Saint' who forced the IBF into ordering a rematch that Froch stated he had no interest in, instead Froch wanted to up his game and fight in Las Vegas against Julio Cesar Chavez Jnr. But rather than relinquish his title, Froch showed Howard Foster was right the first time. And it was Groves who helped galvanise the huge live gate and high pay-per-view take up.
At 26, he's still young, but as Froch stated after the fight, he felt him breathing heavily in the 6th round. The deficient stamina again brought his downfall. He might now consider drafting a letter of apology to maligned referee Howard Foster whose controversial intervention in November probably saved him from being similarly stretched last time.
The event was brilliant for the game but Groves isn't in the Benn, Eubank, Calzaghe class, they won world titles and were proven world champions.
As for Groves' coach Paddy Fitzpatrick, who it emerged last week had lost all of his five professional fights under an alias which surprised a lot of people in the business, but was ultimately exposed. Fitzpatrick certainly warrants reprimand for extremely irresponsible comments associating Froch and death in the ring during the build up and certainly for the ridiculous letter he sent to the BBBofC stating he feared for Froch's life.
Froch, who said himself that he's not a one punch finisher, fought a smart, sensible fight, dictated the tempo and concluded the action with one of the best finishes in a British ring.
Expect him to leave mandatory challenger James DeGale standing at the altar whilst he pursues his dream of fighting under the neon lights of Las Vegas and fattening his wallet in a US pay-per-view event with Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. HBO Sports boss Ken Hershman was an ominous presence at ringside.
To witness close to 80,000 cram into Wembley Stadium, and see boxing again dominating the back pages of the national press, not only provided a tremendous boost for our sport but delivered a solid thump into the protective cup of all the naysayers who whinge that the fight game is in terminal decline.
Boxing in Britain has seldom been more alive. Tune in tonight and see for yourself."
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
I think FW has got all that about right
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
Wow, he reined in his bittnerness about generally everything and actually was a fair summary, didn't really say anything we haven't already heard but nice that he didn't have anything negative or bitter to say, at least not in the public domain.
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
What a fair and magnanimous opinion. I'm very impressed
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
That's not Frank. Who is this imposter?
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
Frank is always that reasonable, it's everybody else who is wrong.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
He was magnanimous in an interview with IFL tv too when asked about it. As was his son Francis.
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
Shirow wrote:![]()
That's not Frank. Who is this imposter?
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
Like many others I clicked on this link expecting a rant, instead its nice that he sees the positive spin it has for the future of the sport.
After so much talk over last few years about the death of the sport it was great to see 80K at an event. There's a few big fights coming up in next few months domestically, hopefully the casuals brought in by the hype for Froch/ Groves 2 stick with the sport.
After so much talk over last few years about the death of the sport it was great to see 80K at an event. There's a few big fights coming up in next few months domestically, hopefully the casuals brought in by the hype for Froch/ Groves 2 stick with the sport.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
Class comments
Re: FW.arren take on Froch/Groves Wembley event
The problem for the casuals is that boxing is a very sport hard to follow. MMA, specifically the UFC, is straightforward. You watch the main show, you see your favorite fighters fight. One channel, one show.moogie101 wrote:Like many others I clicked on this link expecting a rant, instead its nice that he sees the positive spin it has for the future of the sport.
After so much talk over last few years about the death of the sport it was great to see 80K at an event. There's a few big fights coming up in next few months domestically, hopefully the casuals brought in by the hype for Froch/ Groves 2 stick with the sport.
What we got? Primetime, Sky, 5, Eurosport, BT. And NO promotion unless it is a big one.