Page 1 of 2

Giants of the past vs Giants of the present.

Posted: 26 May 2004, 02:57
by 7rounds
What if: Carnera vs Cooney or Willard vs Vitaly Klischko or Abe Simon vs Lennox Lewis or Buddy Baer vs Riddik Bowe?

Posted: 26 May 2004, 20:01
by Iron Mike
Even a guy like McCline would embarrass Carnera, he had a funny style :lol: Cooney would massacre the Klitschkos, Willard, Carnera, McCline, outside of Bowe and Lewis I think he's the top giant

Posted: 26 May 2004, 23:13
by dempseyfire
An interesting topic. Williard I think was a carbon copy of Vitali Klitschko but with better stamina, better inside fight game, and slightly more power, but he also had less athleticism and slightly worse defense. I think Williard could come on strong to take a 12 rd decision over Vitali. I think Cooney beats Wlad but loses to Vitali, but he has a strong puncher's chance (he hit harder than Sanders).
I've seen some Simon film but not recently enough to make accurate comparisons.
McCline would lose to Baer. McCline is a glorified club fighter, who interestingly enough built his resume against other inept giants (Grant, Briggs Whitaker etc.)
Vitali vs Baer would be a toss up to me. A real bloody fight, pretty entertaining.
Its difficult to gauge Carnera, but wins over Uzcudun, Sharkey (I don't buy the dive story), and Loughran are pretty impressive. He was very durable and outside of Bowe the best giant inside fighter I've seen. I still think either Klitschko beats him, but a fight with McCline would be a toss-up for me. If scheduled for 15 rds I'd edge Primo but in a 10 rounder McCline.
Bowe is also difficult to gauge. Had great trilogy with Holyfield but outside of that had a very protected record, he probably deserved to lose against Tubbs, and we'll never know if the Golota fights were more due to Bowe's weight loss issues or the fact he was finally facing a durable power puncher. Still, he knocks out Wlad and McCline, beats Baer by decision and has toss up fights with Vitali, Williard, and Cooney.
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe by decision but beats all the other giants (Cooney has a real puncher's chance as well though) 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. Baer probably loses to Lewis by KO.
Someone who you may want to add to this list is 6'4 Fred Fulton (is that big enough?), who I think in a tournament would win all the marbles. He was basically a white Lennox Lewis (snapping jab, reach, suceptable to hard punch) but I believe more durable and a much better inside fighter.

Posted: 27 May 2004, 01:44
by 7rounds
dempseyfire wrote:An interesting topic. Williard I think was a carbon copy of Vitali Klitschko but with better stamina, better inside fight game, and slightly more power, but he also had less athleticism and slightly worse defense. I think Williard could come on strong to take a 12 rd decision over Vitali. I think Cooney beats Wlad but loses to Vitali, but he has a strong puncher's chance (he hit harder than Sanders).
I've seen some Simon film but not recently enough to make accurate comparisons.
McCline would lose to Baer. McCline is a glorified club fighter, who interestingly enough built his resume against other inept giants (Grant, Briggs Whitaker etc.)
Vitali vs Baer would be a toss up to me. A real bloody fight, pretty entertaining.
Its difficult to gauge Carnera, but wins over Uzcudun, Sharkey (I don't buy the dive story), and Loughran are pretty impressive. He was very durable and outside of Bowe the best giant inside fighter I've seen. I still think either Klitschko beats him, but a fight with McCline would be a toss-up for me. If scheduled for 15 rds I'd edge Primo but in a 10 rounder McCline.
Bowe is also difficult to gauge. Had great trilogy with Holyfield but outside of that had a very protected record, he probably deserved to lose against Tubbs, and we'll never know if the Golota fights were more due to Bowe's weight loss issues or the fact he was finally facing a durable power puncher. Still, he knocks out Wlad and McCline, beats Baer by decision and has toss up fights with Vitali, Williard, and Cooney.
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe by decision but beats all the other giants (Cooney has a real puncher's chance as well though) 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. Baer probably loses to Lewis by KO.
Someone who you may want to add to this list is 6'4 Fred Fulton (is that big enough?), who I think in a tournament would win all the marbles. He was basically a white Lennox Lewis (snapping jab, reach, suceptable to hard punch) but I believe more durable and a much better inside fighter.
Yeah! Dempseyfire 6/4 is already a giant in boxing so i should included Golota and Fulton too. And congratulations you are a boxing expert. I think Abe Simon was too slow, very strong but too slow. Buddy Baer had a good left hook. And Jess Willard good stamina but not punching power. Primo another strong man but lack of punching power most of his wins were fixed. But i guess his knock out of Sharkey was not a dive. Today's giants i think has a better jab and are more quicker than their ancestors.

Posted: 27 May 2004, 11:25
by dempseyfire
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:An interesting topic. Williard I think was a carbon copy of Vitali Klitschko but with better stamina, better inside fight game, and slightly more power, but he also had less athleticism and slightly worse defense. I think Williard could come on strong to take a 12 rd decision over Vitali. I think Cooney beats Wlad but loses to Vitali, but he has a strong puncher's chance (he hit harder than Sanders).
I've seen some Simon film but not recently enough to make accurate comparisons.
McCline would lose to Baer. McCline is a glorified club fighter, who interestingly enough built his resume against other inept giants (Grant, Briggs Whitaker etc.)
Vitali vs Baer would be a toss up to me. A real bloody fight, pretty entertaining.
Its difficult to gauge Carnera, but wins over Uzcudun, Sharkey (I don't buy the dive story), and Loughran are pretty impressive. He was very durable and outside of Bowe the best giant inside fighter I've seen. I still think either Klitschko beats him, but a fight with McCline would be a toss-up for me. If scheduled for 15 rds I'd edge Primo but in a 10 rounder McCline.
Bowe is also difficult to gauge. Had great trilogy with Holyfield but outside of that had a very protected record, he probably deserved to lose against Tubbs, and we'll never know if the Golota fights were more due to Bowe's weight loss issues or the fact he was finally facing a durable power puncher. Still, he knocks out Wlad and McCline, beats Baer by decision and has toss up fights with Vitali, Williard, and Cooney.
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe by decision but beats all the other giants (Cooney has a real puncher's chance as well though) 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. Baer probably loses to Lewis by KO.
Someone who you may want to add to this list is 6'4 Fred Fulton (is that big enough?), who I think in a tournament would win all the marbles. He was basically a white Lennox Lewis (snapping jab, reach, suceptable to hard punch) but I believe more durable and a much better inside fighter.
Yeah! Dempseyfire 6/4 is already a giant in boxing so i should included Golota and Fulton too. And congratulations you are a boxing expert. I think Abe Simon was too slow, very strong but too slow. Buddy Baer had a good left hook. And Jess Willard good stamina but not punching power. Primo another strong man but lack of punching power most of his wins were fixed. But i guess his knock out of Sharkey was not a dive. Today's giants i think has a better jab and are more quicker than their ancestors.
Williard was known for possessing exceptional punching power. His right uppercut ranks alongside history's hardest punches. He drove one fighters' nose bone through his brain with the uppercut, which sadly killed him. His boxing skill can be debated but if you read the accounts of the time the man had serious power.
Primo yes had the punching power of a little girl (despite possessing incredible body strength)

Posted: 27 May 2004, 11:57
by knockout artist
What about the late Big John Tate

Posted: 27 May 2004, 12:28
by 7rounds
dempseyfire wrote:
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:An interesting topic. Williard I think was a carbon copy of Vitali Klitschko but with better stamina, better inside fight game, and slightly more power, but he also had less athleticism and slightly worse defense. I think Williard could come on strong to take a 12 rd decision over Vitali. I think Cooney beats Wlad but loses to Vitali, but he has a strong puncher's chance (he hit harder than Sanders).
I've seen some Simon film but not recently enough to make accurate comparisons.
McCline would lose to Baer. McCline is a glorified club fighter, who interestingly enough built his resume against other inept giants (Grant, Briggs Whitaker etc.)
Vitali vs Baer would be a toss up to me. A real bloody fight, pretty entertaining.
Its difficult to gauge Carnera, but wins over Uzcudun, Sharkey (I don't buy the dive story), and Loughran are pretty impressive. He was very durable and outside of Bowe the best giant inside fighter I've seen. I still think either Klitschko beats him, but a fight with McCline would be a toss-up for me. If scheduled for 15 rds I'd edge Primo but in a 10 rounder McCline.
Bowe is also difficult to gauge. Had great trilogy with Holyfield but outside of that had a very protected record, he probably deserved to lose against Tubbs, and we'll never know if the Golota fights were more due to Bowe's weight loss issues or the fact he was finally facing a durable power puncher. Still, he knocks out Wlad and McCline, beats Baer by decision and has toss up fights with Vitali, Williard, and Cooney.
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe by decision but beats all the other giants (Cooney has a real puncher's chance as well though) 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. Baer probably loses to Lewis by KO.
Someone who you may want to add to this list is 6'4 Fred Fulton (is that big enough?), who I think in a tournament would win all the marbles. He was basically a white Lennox Lewis (snapping jab, reach, suceptable to hard punch) but I believe more durable and a much better inside fighter.
Yeah! Dempseyfire 6/4 is already a giant in boxing so i should included Golota and Fulton too. And congratulations you are a boxing expert. I think Abe Simon was too slow, very strong but too slow. Buddy Baer had a good left hook. And Jess Willard good stamina but not punching power. Primo another strong man but lack of punching power most of his wins were fixed. But i guess his knock out of Sharkey was not a dive. Today's giants i think has a better jab and are more quicker than their ancestors.
Williard was known for possessing exceptional punching power. His right uppercut ranks alongside history's hardest punches. He drove one fighters' nose bone through his brain with the uppercut, which sadly killed him. His boxing skill can be debated but if you read the accounts of the time the man had serious power.
Primo yes had the punching power of a little girl (despite possessing incredible body strength)
I have to read more about Jess Willard, but the ring magazine in a 1980's issue qualified Willard punching power from 1 to 10 to a 6. He faild to knock out Tommy Lougran and Paulino Uzcudum

Posted: 27 May 2004, 12:28
by 7rounds
dempseyfire wrote:
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:An interesting topic. Williard I think was a carbon copy of Vitali Klitschko but with better stamina, better inside fight game, and slightly more power, but he also had less athleticism and slightly worse defense. I think Williard could come on strong to take a 12 rd decision over Vitali. I think Cooney beats Wlad but loses to Vitali, but he has a strong puncher's chance (he hit harder than Sanders).
I've seen some Simon film but not recently enough to make accurate comparisons.
McCline would lose to Baer. McCline is a glorified club fighter, who interestingly enough built his resume against other inept giants (Grant, Briggs Whitaker etc.)
Vitali vs Baer would be a toss up to me. A real bloody fight, pretty entertaining.
Its difficult to gauge Carnera, but wins over Uzcudun, Sharkey (I don't buy the dive story), and Loughran are pretty impressive. He was very durable and outside of Bowe the best giant inside fighter I've seen. I still think either Klitschko beats him, but a fight with McCline would be a toss-up for me. If scheduled for 15 rds I'd edge Primo but in a 10 rounder McCline.
Bowe is also difficult to gauge. Had great trilogy with Holyfield but outside of that had a very protected record, he probably deserved to lose against Tubbs, and we'll never know if the Golota fights were more due to Bowe's weight loss issues or the fact he was finally facing a durable power puncher. Still, he knocks out Wlad and McCline, beats Baer by decision and has toss up fights with Vitali, Williard, and Cooney.
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe by decision but beats all the other giants (Cooney has a real puncher's chance as well though) 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. Baer probably loses to Lewis by KO.
Someone who you may want to add to this list is 6'4 Fred Fulton (is that big enough?), who I think in a tournament would win all the marbles. He was basically a white Lennox Lewis (snapping jab, reach, suceptable to hard punch) but I believe more durable and a much better inside fighter.
Yeah! Dempseyfire 6/4 is already a giant in boxing so i should included Golota and Fulton too. And congratulations you are a boxing expert. I think Abe Simon was too slow, very strong but too slow. Buddy Baer had a good left hook. And Jess Willard good stamina but not punching power. Primo another strong man but lack of punching power most of his wins were fixed. But i guess his knock out of Sharkey was not a dive. Today's giants i think has a better jab and are more quicker than their ancestors.
Williard was known for possessing exceptional punching power. His right uppercut ranks alongside history's hardest punches. He drove one fighters' nose bone through his brain with the uppercut, which sadly killed him. His boxing skill can be debated but if you read the accounts of the time the man had serious power.
Primo yes had the punching power of a little girl (despite possessing incredible body strength)

Posted: 27 May 2004, 12:32
by dempseyfire
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:
lemans7 wrote:Yeah! Dempseyfire 6/4 is already a giant in boxing so i should included Golota and Fulton too. And congratulations you are a boxing expert. I think Abe Simon was too slow, very strong but too slow. Buddy Baer had a good left hook. And Jess Willard good stamina but not punching power. Primo another strong man but lack of punching power most of his wins were fixed. But i guess his knock out of Sharkey was not a dive. Today's giants i think has a better jab and are more quicker than their ancestors.
Williard was known for possessing exceptional punching power. His right uppercut ranks alongside history's hardest punches. He drove one fighters' nose bone through his brain with the uppercut, which sadly killed him. His boxing skill can be debated but if you read the accounts of the time the man had serious power.
Primo yes had the punching power of a little girl (despite possessing incredible body strength)
I have to read more about Jess Willard, but the ring magazine in a 1980's issue qualified Willard punching power from 1 to 10 to a 6. He faild to knock out Tommy Lougran and Paulino Uzcudum
That was Carnera not Williard . . . :wink:

Posted: 27 May 2004, 12:45
by 7rounds
dempseyfire wrote:
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote: Williard was known for possessing exceptional punching power. His right uppercut ranks alongside history's hardest punches. He drove one fighters' nose bone through his brain with the uppercut, which sadly killed him. His boxing skill can be debated but if you read the accounts of the time the man had serious power.
Primo yes had the punching power of a little girl (despite possessing incredible body strength)
I have to read more about Jess Willard, but the ring magazine in a 1980's issue qualified Willard punching power from 1 to 10 to a 6. He faild to knock out Tommy Lougran and Paulino Uzcudum

That was Carnera not Williard . . . :wink:
You are correct. i don't remember the names of Willard 2 defences before Dempsey but if my memory don't fail me again he won those 2 defences of his title by 20 round decision.

Posted: 27 May 2004, 13:31
by overhand_right
dempseyfire wrote: 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. .

when did lennox lewis's stamina ever let him down?

he went hard 10 and 12 rd fights more than once and never lost so what is this?

Posted: 27 May 2004, 15:50
by dempseyfire
overhand_right wrote:
dempseyfire wrote: 15 rds is a different story, as Lewis had stamina issues and never went 15 rds in his life. I think over 15 a fight with Williard would be a toss up. .

when did lennox lewis's stamina ever let him down?

he went hard 10 and 12 rd fights more than once and never lost so what is this?
He was breathing very heavy against Tucker, Holyfield 2, and Mercer and resorted to excessive holding in the late rounds of those fights. Very good cases can be made that he shoulda lost against Holy and Mercer. Didn't see him against Mavoric but reports say he was tired in that fight as well.

Leman he had one defense before fighting Dempsey it was against the very durable and strong chinned Frank Moran.

Posted: 01 Jun 2004, 18:00
by dan1030
I did see the Mavrovic fight, and Lewis didn't look great. He was sluggish and breathing hard by the end of twelve, and was even wobbled a little by Mavrovic at one point--and this was a guy who he had something like 30 pounds on. Not that Lewis had a hard time winning (only 2 or 3 rounds probably went to Mavrovic), but even this guy was able to rasie the two serious questions about Lewis: chin and conditioning.
That having been said, I'd still pick Lewis to beat Willard.

Posted: 01 Jun 2004, 18:19
by Jukejar
I know that he was ridiculed during his career for the KO losses to Wever and Berbick, but Big John Tate had skills and power, and he was way ahead in both of those fights, against two good fighters each in his prime, before being admittedly rendered unconscious. If you watch tapes of Tate against Coetzee and Knoetze and others, he takes a lot of shots to the chin without going down. Hard to figure. Because of his amatuer background and reasonable boxing skills, I see him doing okay against guys such as Simon, Carnera, Willard, and Cooney, and if his chin is the one he showed in South Africa, then he could win decisions against any of those guys and most of todays giants, but even Carnera might knock him out if he finds that magic button.

Okay, I have a sentimental spot for Tate, but for the brief time that he was WBA Champion most people considered him to be THE champion and heir to Ali's throne, even over the WBC's Larry Holmes. After Weaver KO'd Tate in the 15th rd, Holmes gained the recognition based on his previous victory over "Hercules." So Tate at least merits a spot in the discussion.

Posted: 02 Jun 2004, 18:05
by TheRiverCityHippy
dempseyfire wrote:
Lennox Lewis in a 12 rounder loses to Bowe
its a pity bowe didn`t share your confidence

Posted: 02 Jun 2004, 23:46
by 6 Pack
Vitaly Klitschko moves his hands and upperbody pretty well for such a big man. He also has stopped almost ALL of his opponents. He would beat Willard, Carnera, Buddy Baer.

I really don't see how any one can say Willard had better inside fighting than Vitaly. Or that Fulton had better inside fighting. I have seen my fair share of footage of old fights, and from what I saw from WIllard, he won by using his height and reach on smaller opponents. BUt infighting, have not seen any of it. NOt that VItaly fights on the inside much, but saying Willard had better inside fighting seems like more of an assumption.

Same with Fulton. I have read about him, wrote articles on him, but have not seen any fight footage of him, and have not seen his infighting abilities.

I tend to go with the modern guys beating the oldies. The sport has evolved and so have the athletes (like most sports). THis is not always the case of course, but Lewis was a very special big man. Vitaly is harder to call right now as his career is not over. He may prove to be great, or he may loose his next fight. Bowe could fight like hell too.

Don't get me wrong, I like Willard, FUlton and all those other white hope era boxers (Morris, Wills, Palzer are a few other giants from that era) but alot has changed since then.

BTW Carnera was the least skilled of the bunch in my books.

Posted: 03 Jun 2004, 09:16
by ThirdPartyView
lemans7 wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:
lemans7 wrote: I have to read more about Jess Willard, but the ring magazine in a 1980's issue qualified Willard punching power from 1 to 10 to a 6. He faild to knock out Tommy Lougran and Paulino Uzcudum

That was Carnera not Williard . . . :wink:
You are correct. i don't remember the names of Willard 2 defences before Dempsey but if my memory don't fail me again he won those 2 defences of his title by 20 round decision.
Jess Willard only had one successful World Heavyweight Championship title defense on record, and that is the 3/25/16 fight against Frank Moran where Willard got the Newspaper Decision win over Moran. Jess only defended the title again 3 years later against Jack Dempsey on 7/4/19, when he lost the belt in 3 rounds.

Posted: 03 Jun 2004, 14:18
by 6 Pack
He got a news paper decision over Moran (who was a legit contender), and he also fought some guy named Sailor WHite or Sailor BUrke or something like that. THe fight is rarely listed as being for the title, but I guess it all depends who you ask now.

When he fought Dempsey he was in pretty bad shape. Looked slow and easy to hit. Dempsey was also 24 and on fire :wink: . That title defense was brutal. Rarely do you see a heavyweight Champion loose his belt in such a once sided masacre like what took place in 1919.

Posted: 03 Jun 2004, 14:34
by ThirdPartyView
6 Pack wrote:He got a news paper decision over Moran (who was a legit contender), and he also fought some guy named Sailor WHite or Sailor BUrke or something like that. THe fight is rarely listed as being for the title, but I guess it all depends who you ask now.

When he fought Dempsey he was in pretty bad shape. Looked slow and easy to hit. Dempsey was also 24 and on fire :wink: . That title defense was brutal. Rarely do you see a heavyweight Champion loose his belt in such a once sided masacre like what took place in 1919.
Sailor Burke was a non-title fight. I just looked through some articles of the era, and none of them said it was for the World's Heavyweight Championship. I believe it was a six rounder, which would have been really short for a World Heavyweight title defense (don't think in any era it would have been an acceptable maximum length).

As for the Dempsey/Willard massacre, I'd say Baer/Carnera was pretty bad as well. Downed 11 times?! Carnera was pretty damn lucky to last as long as he did, especially considering Baer's reputation as a hitter. :P

Posted: 04 Jun 2004, 13:11
by 6 Pack
Sure the Baer-Carnera fight was a beating too, but Carnera did not take the damage Willard took. Carnera kept getting up and lasted until the 11th round!

WIllard lost teeth, ribs cracked, jaw broke, eye socket smashed, eye cut, face swollen like a pumpkin and down seven times in one round! The fight was over in Three.

BTW Patterson-Ingamar was pretty bad too. All these fights should have been stopped way before they were. NOne would happen today like they did, and thank God for that.

Posted: 04 Jun 2004, 13:21
by dempseyfire
6 Pack wrote:Vitaly Klitschko moves his hands and upperbody pretty well for such a big man. He also has stopped almost ALL of his opponents. He would beat Willard, Carnera, Buddy Baer.

I really don't see how any one can say Willard had better inside fighting than Vitaly. Or that Fulton had better inside fighting. I have seen my fair share of footage of old fights, and from what I saw from WIllard, he won by using his height and reach on smaller opponents. BUt infighting, have not seen any of it. NOt that VItaly fights on the inside much, but saying Willard had better inside fighting seems like more of an assumption.

Same with Fulton. I have read about him, wrote articles on him, but have not seen any fight footage of him, and have not seen his infighting abilities.

I tend to go with the modern guys beating the oldies. The sport has evolved and so have the athletes (like most sports). THis is not always the case of course, but Lewis was a very special big man. Vitaly is harder to call right now as his career is not over. He may prove to be great, or he may loose his next fight. Bowe could fight like hell too.

Don't get me wrong, I like Willard, FUlton and all those other white hope era boxers (Morris, Wills, Palzer are a few other giants from that era) but alot has changed since then.

BTW Carnera was the least skilled of the bunch in my books.
The sport hasn't changed that much since the 1920s. If anything guys today have lesser trainers and are in lesser condition.
Watch Dempsey-Williard: When Dempsey first tries to get inside, Williard lets go with a flurry of short hooks. Klitschko NEVER throws short hooks. And it really doesn't matter if he's "almost stopped all of his opponents" if he's only had 30 something fights with only 4 top teners, and he lost two of them. Williard was surely not the fastest guy around, but he was pretty nimble for a big man, and all of the sports-writers of the time admitted he had a pretty fast snappy jab, which is supported by the films.

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 01:12
by gensu3k1
6 Pack wrote:Sure the Baer-Carnera fight was a beating too, but Carnera did not take the damage Willard took. Carnera kept getting up and lasted until the 11th round!
It also had ebb and flow. Baer would have a round where he would knock Carnera down 2 or 3 times, and then Carnera would take the next two rounds with his jab.

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 12:00
by 6 Pack
gensu3k1, exactly! :TU:

Dempseyfire, you mention sportswriters from that era commenting on WIllard's jab. Have you read what else they say about him? For every good thing they say about his technique the is some thing bashing him as slow, basic, inactive, easy to hit, etc.

I seen that Dempsey fight, you really were impressed with ol' WIllard in that fight? Can I imagine VItaly doing better in that fight? I can't imagine him doing much worst :lol: .

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 14:23
by 7rounds
6 Pack wrote:gensu3k1, exactly! :TU:

Dempseyfire, you mention sportswriters from that era commenting on WIllard's jab. Have you read what else they say about him? For every good thing they say about his technique the is some thing bashing him as slow, basic, inactive, easy to hit, etc.

I seen that Dempsey fight, you really were impressed with ol' WIllard in that fight? Can I imagine VItaly doing better in that fight? I can't imagine him doing much worst :lol: .
Vitaly is an athlete he could had give Dempesey a hell of a fight, and remember that Vitaly can take a punch and he prove it against Lennox Lewis.

Posted: 05 Jun 2004, 15:42
by dan1030
Has any concensus emerged here on who the single best "giant" (say, 6'4" or taller) of all time is? Dare I propose a top five or ten list?