Page 1 of 2
Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04
by colin russell
Cant work out why this bout is taking place,what will the winner get out of it apart from a black eye and a bloddy nose. Its not there World ranking will put eighter one up for a Title. Earl hasn't fought since 2009 and Katsidis since ? Maybe it should be a WWE I quit match you lose you quit. Just my thought what am I missing.

Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 30 Jun 2014, 21:39
by dberry
colin russell wrote:Cant work out why this bout is taking place,what will the winner get out of it apart from a black eye and a bloddy nose. Its not there World ranking will put eighter one up for a Title. Earl hasn't fought since 2009 and Katsidis since ? Maybe it should be a WWE I quit match you lose you quit. Just my thought what am I missing.

Sometimes fighters just like to, you know, fight. So long as there's a chance to knuckle some one and a pay check, that's all the reason true fighters need.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 01 Jul 2014, 06:08
by AntonS
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 07:20
by Grant
This fight is being smashed over on te British board, as it shoul
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 08:09
by AntonS
Grant wrote:
This fight is being smashed over on te British board, as it shoul
So be it, but the show is just about booked out, whether we like it or not
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 09:11
by Matt Ropis
One of the most dangerous fights I have seen.
I would quite happily pay Mick the entrance fee not to fight.
Is the promoter liable if something goes amiss?
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 09:52
by AntonS
Matt Ropis wrote:One of the most dangerous fights I have seen.
I would quite happily pay Mick the entrance fee not to fight.
Is the promoter liable if something goes amiss?
Nope, nor is Qld ANBF
IMO, everyone is over reacting. Nothing has been submitted by British Control Board concerning Earl's welfare
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 10:33
by Matt Ropis
Yes it has I read the letter from the BBBC they wouldn't licence him so he got licensed in Spain.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 06:53
by bogan whisperer
Matt Ropis wrote:Yes it has I read the letter from the BBBC they wouldn't licence him so he got licensed in Spain.
Thanks for confirming that. Makes this fight even more diabolical than I had thought.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 07:49
by AntonS
bash for cash wrote:Matt Ropis wrote:Yes it has I read the letter from the BBBC they wouldn't licence him so he got licensed in Spain.
Thanks for confirming that. Makes this fight even more diabolical than I had thought.
No such document exists. If it did, why didn't ANBF Qld receive it? I doubt Earl is registered in Spain...wouldn't need to be to fight in Oz nor outside UK
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 09:17
by Matt Ropis
AntonS wrote:bash for cash wrote:Matt Ropis wrote:Yes it has I read the letter from the BBBC they wouldn't licence him so he got licensed in Spain.
Thanks for confirming that. Makes this fight even more diabolical than I had thought.
No such document exists. If it did, why didn't ANBF Qld receive it? I doubt Earl is registered in Spain...wouldn't need to be to fight in Oz nor outside UK
I must have imagined it.

Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 10:22
by AntonS
British Board of Control is a non-government body as is ANBF Qld. As such both have limited power.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 16:26
by bogan whisperer
AntonS wrote:British Board of Control is a non-government body as is ANBF Qld. As such both have limited power.
Man says he read the letter from the BBBC and they wouldn't licence Earl.
You calling him a liar?
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 19:22
by Mark pawsey
If Earl is registered in Spain do they accept Spanish registrations here? If they do he would need a clearance from Spain. If they don't Earl would be registered here, so than he would be most likely registered in NSW or Victoria.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 20:59
by colin russell
As I said a I quit bout, im concerned for them both. My opion is this bout shouldn't be taking place. God be with you both.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 03 Jul 2014, 23:49
by bogan whisperer
colin russell wrote:As I said a I quit bout, im concerned for them both. My opion is this bout shouldn't be taking place. God be with you both.
There are reservations from many quarters about this fight.
It will probably take a ring death before people start taking seriously and applying the due diligence they are entrusted with.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 09:03
by fox
No dramas of either getting hurt at this stage although it's all Katsidis. About round 5.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 09:10
by fox
Should be a shutout at halfway.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 09:23
by Seima99
Is the fight still going? And how's it looking?
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 10:05
by fox
Katsidis unanimous. 120-108,119-109,120-109.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 10:32
by Matt Ropis
Worst possible result for Earl wins 1 round out of 36 and has fought one of our hardest punching fighters.
First fight in 5 years over 12 rounds

Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 10:53
by AntonS
Matt Ropis wrote:Worst possible result for Earl wins 1 round out of 36 and has fought one of our hardest punching fighters.
First fight in 5 years over 12 rounds

$ is a $ and is the name of the game these days, unlike your & brother's day's in the ring in 70's
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 17:25
by bogan whisperer
Matt Ropis wrote:Worst possible result for Earl wins 1 round out of 36 and has fought one of our hardest punching fighters.
First fight in 5 years over 12 rounds

A 12 round pounding. Just what a guy who shouldn't have been in the ring in the first place needed.
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 19:49
by caveman
yep,just a money fight
Re: Katsidis V Earl
Posted: 04 Jul 2014, 20:25
by bogan whisperer
caveman wrote:yep,just a money fight
Hope Earl still thinks the money was worth it when he has a chance to weigh things up in a few years time.