david haye plans
Posted: 02 Jul 2014, 07:22
this to55er chasing the wba belt between chagaev and oquendo
do one mate
https://twitter.com/mrdavidhaye
do one mate
https://twitter.com/mrdavidhaye
This ^^mullenman wrote:great route back to the top for the Hayemaker,,
he is a sicknote but what a fantastic boxer he is
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter . i haven't really seen anything from great haye at heavy weight ,his last fight vs chisora was a good finish but haye didn't look great up to then then before wlad completely dominated haye .Josh1111 wrote:This ^^mullenman wrote:great route back to the top for the Hayemaker,,
he is a sicknote but what a fantastic boxer he is
People seem to forget how good of a boxer Haye actually is
Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
Definitely. But he's fighting at Heavyweight, where he's never shone.ttornado wrote:Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
great cruiser weight but with todays giants he's not a real heavy weight 20 years ago he'd of been ok vs the like of moorer , holyfield size wise but now he's to small .ttornado wrote:Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
Wlad completely dominates every heavyweight so hardly a good comparison.stevedoc wrote:he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter . i haven't really seen anything from great haye at heavy weight ,his last fight vs chisora was a good finish but haye didn't look great up to then then before wlad completely dominated haye .Josh1111 wrote:This ^^mullenman wrote:great route back to the top for the Hayemaker,,
he is a sicknote but what a fantastic boxer he is
People seem to forget how good of a boxer Haye actually is
If I was a top ten contender and he wanted to fight me I would use every excuse I could think of to keep well away.tiny_acres wrote:If I was a top 10 contender and Haye wanted to fight me.I would want in writitng
I am paid 100% of my pay if Haye pulls out.And I mean pulls out for any reason.
He kept Fury a hostage for nearly a year.
No one can say Haye is not talented but he is an egomaniac.
He is good never denied this.I just don't trust him to keep a scheduled fight.leejonesjnr wrote:If I was a top ten contender and he wanted to fight me I would use every excuse I could think of to keep well away.tiny_acres wrote:If I was a top 10 contender and Haye wanted to fight me.I would want in writitng
I am paid 100% of my pay if Haye pulls out.And I mean pulls out for any reason.
He kept Fury a hostage for nearly a year.
No one can say Haye is not talented but he is an egomaniac.
Like him or not Haye is by some margin the best heavyweight in the country the second he renews his license.
What an uneducated comment. He won that Russian Nickolay Valuev for the heavyweight WBA belt. Also he would of beat Klitschko if his toe was not broken.mickey1975 wrote:Definitely. But he's fighting at Heavyweight, where he's never shone.ttornado wrote:Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
I certainly hope that was a joke about Haye and the toe.No way would he of won.manwhobets wrote:What an uneducated comment. He won that Russian Nickolay Valuev for the heavyweight WBA belt. Also he would of beat Klitschko if his toe was not broken.ttornado wrote:Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
Definitely. But he's fighting at Heavyweight, where he's never shone.
Holyfield was a far better heavyweight that Haye ever was, and a far better cruiser, he was better all around. Haye had better power, perhaps, though when you think about the levels of competition, I'm not sure that's true either. Holyfield was so much tougher, and technically better, hell, he should have won against Valuev, an arguably did better than Haye in his late 40's.stevedoc wrote:great cruiser weight but with todays giants he's not a real heavy weight 20 years ago he'd of been ok vs the like of moorer , holyfield size wise but now he's to small .ttornado wrote:Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.stevedoc wrote:
he's not that good , i think we like the idea of haye more than the actual fighter .
That and Valuev was simply a big lump with little in the way of ability. A fight earlier he was lucky to get the decision against a 46 year old Evander Holyfield, with a near 7 stone weight advantage to go with 10 inches in height and 7 inches in reach on him.tiny_acres wrote:I certainly hope that was a joke about Haye and the toe.No way would he of won.manwhobets wrote:What an uneducated comment. He won that Russian Nickolay Valuev for the heavyweight WBA belt. Also he would of beat Klitschko if his toe was not broken.ttornado wrote: Haye was an excellent cruiserweight.
Definitely. But he's fighting at Heavyweight, where he's never shone.
I didn't think he won at the time. not watched the fight since but have read comments on here in the past who agree.mickey1975 wrote:Manwhobets is a troll. The Valuev win was nothing special. It was a terrible bout.
Terrible bout for the neutral - if you wanted Haye to win it was intriguing, and he did what he had to domickey1975 wrote:Manwhobets is a troll. The Valuev win was nothing special. It was a terrible bout.
Yes it was a bore but Valuev is 7' tall and weighed a 100lbs heavier than Haye. Which is an incredible deficit in weight to give up. Haye broke his hand on the humongous skull but still managed to make him do a funny dance in the 12th which was exciting.mickey1975 wrote:Manwhobets is a troll. The Valuev win was nothing special. It was a terrible bout.

Are we talking about the guy who won his European title in 47 seconds and beat the world number 1?dbf wrote:Haye wasn't excellent as a cruiserweight. He struggled with fragmeni, looked poor against the stiff (forgot his name) he went 12 with. Wasn't exactly dominating Mormeck before the stoppage.
He achieved well at the weight but wasn't this excellent fighter people sometimes make out. He showed plenty of vulnerabilities. He was an explosive power puncher with good hand speed.
The only people who thought valuev won the fight after sitting down and scoring it properly are people who dont know how to score a fight and scored for non landing punches.Naandrew wrote:I didn't think he won at the time. not watched the fight since but have read comments on here in the past who agree.mickey1975 wrote:Manwhobets is a troll. The Valuev win was nothing special. It was a terrible bout.