Page 1 of 3

Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 18:07
by taffytoon
November most probably Liverpool.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 18:09
by crusader
Looking forward to it.

Let's go Clev!

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 18:23
by sir123
Hope Clev destroys him and puts the arrogant so and so into retirement!

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 19:39
by Boxerbeetle
Fair play to Cleverly if it does take place in Liverpool, that'll be twice he's agreed to fight Bellew in his hometown.

Hope Cleverly does a number on him, I used to like Bellew but his constant OTT pre-fight antics, his ridiculous exaggeration of his own abilities & his recent distasteful comments to Boxing Monthly about Clev have left me wanting to see him get smashed.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 19:50
by Manchester Hitman
I hope Clev batters him

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:05
by smiling assassin
Couldnt care less who wins. Meaningless fight in my opinion, neither will do anything of real note in the division. Like both fighters but Clev has not looked good at CW and we will not here the end of how good Bellew is if he wins(only from his mouth though)

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:13
by Roars Like Me
It's odd as I think Clev acts like the bellend with his cut off top, tatts and baseball cap back to front. I know Tony is hot headed but if the reason he went off is because Clev denies the fact that he was in his toughest fight in their 1st one then back trakced then why wouldn't you lose it?

I like Tony's passion over Cleverly's 'whatever he is'.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:16
by crusader
his cut off top, tatts and baseball cap back to front
Well what an fornicating jerk he is then.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:44
by rossij8
I always want the horrible, mouthy one to lose

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:59
by TopGun
Manchester Hitman wrote:I hope Clev batters him

x2...Bellew has done himself no favours with fans. It so obvious he is trying to make money from his petty scripted arguments to try and create a pay day for himself. Love to see Clev KO him

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 05:59
by arlovski
Boxerbeetle123 wrote:Fair play to Cleverly if it does take place in Liverpool, that'll be twice he's agreed to fight Bellew in his hometown.

Hope Cleverly does a number on him, I used to like Bellew but his constant OTT pre-fight antics, his ridiculous exaggeration of his own abilities & his recent distasteful comments to Boxing Monthly about Clev have left me wanting to see him get smashed.

agreed

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 06:13
by King Tubby
Bellew comes across as a top bloke, good sportsman, until he puts that act on. Then he looks like a Div.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 06:15
by Roars Like Me
crusader wrote:
his cut off top, tatts and baseball cap back to front
Well what an effing jerk he is then.

He's not sarcastic so not a complete one.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 06:21
by ttornado
crusader wrote:
his cut off top, tatts and baseball cap back to front
Well what an effing jerk he is then.
Yeah I agree, trigonometry this, calculus that makes me sick

SOH CAH TOA

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 06:39
by Gazmac81
Is the top Bloke Nice Guy routine the act though
is there 2 possibly 3 Tony Bellews , like in Superman 3

will Clev beat Tony into a pulp and the real Tony bellew who has been taken over by the other Tony Bellews come to the surface???

im i overthinking Tony Bellew ????

King Tubby wrote:Bellew comes across as a top bloke, good sportsman, until he puts that act on. Then he looks like a Div.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 08:18
by bripez
Roars Like Me wrote: I know Tony is hot headed but if the reason he went off is because Clev denies the fact that he was in his toughest fight in their 1st one then back trakced then why wouldn't you lose it?
The presser where Bellew jumped up, called Cleverley a fookin rat and offered to fight him in the car park was before their fight.

And because he was beaten in his own back yard, Bellew is somehow trying to excuse his behaviour by blaming it on Cleverley because he won, didn't give him an immediate rematch and has not publically declared that Bellew gave him his toughest fight.

Yep, seems reasonable to me ....... :bag:

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 09:31
by Gazmac81
i can see it now

"i was drained at cruiser" , "im a different animal at heavyweight , i was knocking them out in the amateurs ect ect "

and piff poff poof Bellew and Eddie have cast a spell and Liverpool believes again,

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 09:37
by Roars Like Me
bripez wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote: I know Tony is hot headed but if the reason he went off is because Clev denies the fact that he was in his toughest fight in their 1st one then back trakced then why wouldn't you lose it?
The presser where Bellew jumped up, called Cleverley a fookin rat and offered to fight him in the car park was before their fight.

And because he was beaten in his own back yard, Bellew is somehow trying to excuse his behaviour by blaming it on Cleverley because he won, didn't give him an immediate rematch and has not publically declared that Bellew gave him his toughest fight.

Yep, seems reasonable to me ....... :bag:
Yeah I remember the rat stuff that was just silly stuff and he does have divvy moments. It was recently when they had a pop at each other after their fights on the same bill. Thi is where he mentioned why he's being so hostile to Nathan. Whilst it's way over the top it's obviuosly out of order and it doens't take much to get Tony at it.

They are probably together now playing dominos saying 'we drummed up quite a bit of cash for this one, well doen ol' bean' :box:

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 10:45
by Cholo_cws
Gazmac81 wrote:i can see it now

"i was drained at cruiser" , "im a different animal at heavyweight , i was knocking them out in the amateurs ect ect "

and piff poff poof Bellew and Eddie have cast a spell and Liverpool believes again,
Didn't he already call out Vitali at the time of the protests and uprising in Kiev earlier in the year?

"Get me the man from the rallys"

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 10:55
by rio
Gazmac81 wrote:i can see it now

"i was drained at cruiser" , "im a different animal at heavyweight , i was knocking them out in the amateurs ect ect "

and piff poff poof Bellew and Eddie have cast a spell and Liverpool believes again,

Hope this happens. Then next fight joshua and bellow can show us what hes all about!!

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 11:03
by Taansend
Not that bothered who wins. Don't have a clue who'd be favourite either. Should be a good bout.

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 11:26
by Ezzard
These guys are excellent pros. Both got beaten by possibly the two most improved and most in-form boxers in world boxing.

In view of this I think the comments here are harsh.

Their first fight was tremendous. I scored it 6-6 and the rematch is a natural.

Both men are doing their best to sell the fight. Neither man will ever win a BAFTA but so what? They are genuine world level fighters and I suspect that they haven’t earned as much as their talents deserve.

Good luck to both men. A big thanks from me for giving us a rematch.

50-50 fights are what boxing is all about. If you don’t like this kind of fight I don’t know what to say…

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 13:43
by righthook
bripez wrote:
Roars Like Me wrote: I know Tony is hot headed but if the reason he went off is because Clev denies the fact that he was in his toughest fight in their 1st one then back trakced then why wouldn't you lose it?
The presser where Bellew jumped up, called Cleverley a fookin rat and offered to fight him in the car park was before their fight.

And because he was beaten in his own back yard, Bellew is somehow trying to excuse his behaviour by blaming it on Cleverley because he won, didn't give him an immediate rematch and has not publically declared that Bellew gave him his toughest fight.

Yep, seems reasonable to me ....... :bag:
Let me just correct you there bripez

It was Cleverly who offered bellew a street fight in the car park not the other way round!!!!!!

Cleverly says il take you in the car park and bellew replies well do it now you fu***** rat.

Also i will correct you on another issue, Bellew dislikes Cleverly anyway but one of the main reasons (as bellew has said in an interview) is because cleverly spoke to him after the fight and said your the toughest fight iv ever had and his own father said the same to Bellew, then when bellew wasnt at the post fight interview Cleverly and his dad said oh we didnt get out of second gear in this fight. Everything i have said in the statement above is 100% fact!

So now i ask you this, is cleverly not as bad as bellew if not worst offering to take some one into the car park for a street fight?

They dont get on and never will but lets not jump on the band wagon and make crap up when you have no idea what really happened. Next time i suggest listening and researching what actually happened instead of coming on here and sounding like an idiot who hasnt got a clue about what they are talking about.

For me i hope bellew puts him fast asleep and i for one cant wait for the fight.

BOMBS AWAY :bag:

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 13:56
by handsofstone
I think Bellew could win this one providing he keeps his emotions in check,its all well being passionate but he gets far too excited and would probably get more respect as a boxer from some fans if he wasnt so volatile and if he just kept a lower profile during the build ups because he makes all these bold predictions and sometimes boxes cautious so fans feel robbed even though theres nowt wrong with being cautious

Cleverly mind you could've done with a better tune up

Re: Clev v Bellew II is on

Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 14:25
by tony1234
Will a meaningless title be up for grabs ?