WBA What?
Posted: 13 Aug 2014, 06:20
Have I gone completely mad, or do the WBA actually have 3 Middleweight Champions at the moment?
If I understand this right, Golovkin is the "Super" Champion, Dmitry Chudinov has been Interim Champion for over a year, yet on Saturday, Daniel Jacobs won the "Regular" Championship, while Chudinov defended his belt in Russia.
Can anybody explain what is going on? I remember back in the late 80s, we scoffed at the WBO for bringing yet another belt into the Alphabet soup, but now these clowns have 3 different championship belts at the same weight!
It's beyond me. Perhaps I'm still living under a false assumption that Interim belts were to he used when the Champion was unable to defend his title. Is this all just about money? Sanctioning fees? Or is there actually a sensible answer behind this madness?
If I understand this right, Golovkin is the "Super" Champion, Dmitry Chudinov has been Interim Champion for over a year, yet on Saturday, Daniel Jacobs won the "Regular" Championship, while Chudinov defended his belt in Russia.
Can anybody explain what is going on? I remember back in the late 80s, we scoffed at the WBO for bringing yet another belt into the Alphabet soup, but now these clowns have 3 different championship belts at the same weight!
It's beyond me. Perhaps I'm still living under a false assumption that Interim belts were to he used when the Champion was unable to defend his title. Is this all just about money? Sanctioning fees? Or is there actually a sensible answer behind this madness?