Page 1 of 1
Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 11:52
by Taansend
Fair play to Kell. I stayed away from predictions on this one as I had no clue how good he is, despite having seen him fight maybe a dozen times.
A quick question though. I heard him say, both before and after the fight, that he was the first Briton to go to the US to beat an American for the Welterweight title in 20 years - or since Honeyghan, which is actually closer to 30 years now. But Hatton went to the States & beat Collazo for the Welter title. Back in 2006.
Has Brook just forgotten that or did I miss some point? It's not a big deal but one of those things that my weird brain will thinking about now.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 12:16
by The Law
Taansend wrote:Fair play to Kell. I stayed away from predictions on this one as I had no clue how good he is, despite having seen him fight maybe a dozen times.
A quick question though. I heard him say, both before and after the fight, that he was the first Briton to go to the US to beat an American for the Welterweight title in 20 years - or since Honeyghan, which is actually closer to 30 years now. But Hatton went to the States & beat Collazo for the Welter title. Back in 2006.
Has Brook just forgotten that or did I miss some point? It's not a big deal but one of those things that my weird brain will thinking about now.
I think he meant go over there as an underdog, whereas Hatton was the favourite to win.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 12:58
by Pugilist-specialist
The Law wrote:
I think he meant go over there as an underdog, whereas Hatton was the favourite to win.
Brook was the dark horse
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 14:14
by Taansend
Aaah, got it. Thanks Guys.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 14:52
by Baboon
More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 14:58
by palooka
Pugilist-specialist wrote:The Law wrote:
I think he meant go over there as an underdog, whereas Hatton was the favourite to win.
Brook was the dark horse
That's enough horsing around from you thank you very much.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 15:35
by Taansend
Baboon wrote:More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Doesn't seem that long ago, does it
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 17:07
by Baboon
Taansend wrote:Baboon wrote:More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Doesn't seem that long ago, does it
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Indeed, however looking at the footage of it and the quality outfits and bonces it's definitely 80s
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 17 Aug 2014, 23:54
by Taansend
Baboon wrote:Taansend wrote:Baboon wrote:More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Doesn't seem that long ago, does it
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Indeed, however looking at the footage of it and the quality outfits and bonces it's definitely 80s
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
I had a wet look perm (Jeri curl) & wore shirts back then

Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 18 Aug 2014, 03:27
by bigjack
I was always envious of Tony Tuckers curls,looked like the guy from 'coming to America '

Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 18 Aug 2014, 03:41
by tobyh5
Baboon wrote:More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Had the same sad realisation
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 18 Aug 2014, 03:52
by Sklar
Taansend wrote:Baboon wrote:More concerning is the fact that it is nearly 28 years since Honeyghan mauled Curry. I feel ancient. My Sunday is ruined...

Doesn't seem that long ago, does it
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
It's a short life, chaps. Scott and Charlene celebrated their silver wedding anniversary last year!
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 19 Aug 2014, 06:16
by hurlock
Was collazo the champion?
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 19 Aug 2014, 07:33
by Baboon
hurlock wrote:Was collazo the champion?
Yes, WBA. Although they were already bvggering about with 'World' and 'Super World' by that time. Collazo was definitely champ, how utterly legitimate is open to debate (as always).
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 19 Aug 2014, 07:45
by garethhop
The specific stat being tossed around is that brook was first since Lloyd to beat an unbeaten American in his back yard for a belt.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 20 Aug 2014, 14:06
by Cholo_cws
Baboon wrote:hurlock wrote:Was collazo the champion?
Yes, WBA. Although they were already bvggering about with 'World' and 'Super World' by that time. Collazo was definitely champ, how utterly legitimate is open to debate (as always).
Yeah, I think they took it off of Baldomir who'd just beaten undispued champ Judah but didn't pay the WBA a fee.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 20 Aug 2014, 15:06
by Pugilist-specialist
Brook beats Honeyghan and Hatton. They'd both be weak at the weight.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 20 Aug 2014, 15:20
by palooka
Pugilist-specialist wrote:Brook beats Honeyghan and Hatton. They'd both be weak at the weight.

and Leonard and Robinson.
Re: Brook, Honeyghan, Hatton.
Posted: 21 Aug 2014, 10:29
by Taansend
palooka wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:Brook beats Honeyghan and Hatton. They'd both be weak at the weight.

and Leonard and Robinson.
At the same time
