Page 1 of 1

Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 05 Sep 2014, 15:41
by gazzman87
I know it's something that has been brought up on several occasions and I have even seen the calculation on how fights are judged, but sometimes do you not just need to use common sense?

This weekend the Frampton vs Kiko fight is a 4 star fight. A headlining rematch in front of 16 thousand people for a World-title (IBF super bantamweight title)

This weekend the Alicia Ashley (21-9-1) vs Jackie Nava (29-4-3) is a 5 star fight. non-headlining not a rematch for a World-title (WBC female super bantamweight title)

Why is this happening?

Re: Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 05 Sep 2014, 18:37
by chucktaylor
I just looked it up and it's a 2-star fight currently. http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=696649
Either way, the star ratings for male boxing isn't on the same scale as female, since there are far fewer female boxers than male.
The star ratings aren't that meaningful in terms of the popularity/significance of a given fight anyway- I seem to remember Froch-Groves II being a 4 star.

Re: Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 06 Sep 2014, 00:13
by crusader
Star rating are based purely on BoxRec fighter ratings, which are not determined by titles or attendance. I also don't see why Martinez-Frampton being a rematch makes the fight more appealing or significant; due to greater uncertainty I'd probably be looking more forward to it had Frampton not already won fairly comfortably by stoppage.
Bout Star Ratings

All bouts are rated with 0 to 5 stars.

Men

5 stars = both opponents have 331 ratings points at least ~ best 100 boxers
4 stars = both opponents have 188 ratings points at least ~ best 300 boxers
3 stars = both opponents have 83 ratings points at least ~ best 900 boxers
2 stars = both opponents have 24 ratings points at least ~ best 2700 boxers
1 stars = both opponents have 1 rating point at least = rated boxers
0 stars = one opponents has not even 1 rating point at least = not rated boxers

Women

5 stars = both opponents have 42 ratings points at least ~ best 30 boxers
4 stars = both opponents have 28 ratings points at least ~ best 60 boxers
3 stars = both opponents have 14 ratings points at least ~ best 120 boxers
2 stars = both opponents have 4 ratings points at least ~ best 240 boxers
1 stars = both opponents have 1 rating point at least = rated boxers
0 stars = one opponents has not even 1 rating point at least = not rated boxers

Re: Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 06 Sep 2014, 07:49
by Final round
2 stars? I'm not watching that

Re: Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 06 Sep 2014, 09:25
by gazzman87
Final round wrote:2 stars? I'm not watching that
http://boxrec.com/date_search.php?yyyy=2014&mm=09&dd=06

Re: Rating fights on BoxRec 0 to 5 star system this weekend.

Posted: 06 Sep 2014, 09:41
by Dan Dares
Adam Booth once asked why Shawn Porter v Phil Lo Greco wasn't a five star fight on Boxrec. I had no idea about the way the star rankings worked at the time, but having since watched the fight, it was f**king obvious why, regardless of the maths.