Page 1 of 1
Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 10 Sep 2014, 23:09
by Freedom2013
What is your opinion of the Mayweather-Maidana II PPV undercard?
http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=693393
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 10 Sep 2014, 23:31
by Jpreisser
It's weak. There are some notables, but they are largely in mismatches. I think Soto-Molina might be good.
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 12 Sep 2014, 10:48
by beatdown337
its pretty much par for the course these days.........
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 12 Sep 2014, 10:52
by Boxing Writer
If Molina - Soto fight wasn't there, I would say it's awful
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 12 Sep 2014, 11:31
by Impractical Poster
The best fight on the undercard is not even on the PPV card. Angulo/De La Rosa is the main event on the free preview. They must be hoping this match is so good it will edge the people on the fence to buy the PPV.
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 12 Sep 2014, 12:43
by stevedoc
i hadn't realized it was so poor
Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV
Posted: 12 Sep 2014, 12:52
by Datsue
fergusg wrote:beatdown337 wrote:its pretty much par for the course these days.........
I agree!
People like to embellish their opinions for dramatic effect, but the fact remains the undercard is at very least on a par with the type events that Top Rank usually puts on.
Three questions mate, in light of your post:
1) are we still allowed to comment?
2) does what you've posted make it okay?
3) are you committed to playing Devil's Advocate about everything in the world? I mean, if someone was talking about the Armenian genocide, would you come along & correct them & explain how Rwanda was worse or something?
***
On-topic: Santa-Cruz's challenger is fornicate-awful. Yes, Quigg's is bad, but LSC's is
terrible.