Page 1 of 3
Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 13:12
by Freedom2013
- When Kell Brook won the title from Shawn Porter, he didn't have a crooked ref protecting him from inside fighting and allowing him to clamp his opponent's arm
- Brook didn't demand Porter wear gloves with extra padding
- Brook was fighting IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY in his opponent's home country, something Floyd has NEVER had the courage to do
- Brook never pretended to be bitten when he wanted a rest or time to recover
- Brook never pretended to be pushed down to get the ref to deduct a point
- Brook doesn't beat up women (as far as I know)
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 13:13
by BAD INTENTIONS
Come on man, get over it!
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 13:24
by ReggieDiggs
Freedom2013 wrote:

Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 14:09
by Freedom2013
Shawn Porter is a better win than Marcos Maidana.
Porter was undefeated and he's never been knocked down.
Maidana is shopworn and has lost to ordinary boxers like Kotelnik and Alexander.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 14:13
by Baby Face Finster
Freedom2013 wrote:Shawn Porter is a better win than Marcos Maidana.
Porter was undefeated and he's never been knocked down.
Maidana is shopworn and has lost to ordinary boxers like Kotelnik and Alexander.
That doesn't tell the whole story. Maidana is a much better fighter now than when he fought those guys.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 14:15
by Freedom2013
Baby Face Finster wrote:That doesn't tell the whole story. Maidana is a much better fighter now than when he fought those guys.
Actually, last night he looked less relentless and more easily fatigued than he was in his prime.
Interestingly, Porter dominated Alexander and Alexander defeated Maidana.
They are similar, but Porter is in his prime, while Maidana is a bit faded and shopworn.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 14:40
by beatdown337
If you don't like Floyd, don't watch. Saying porter is a better win than maidana is silly.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 14:47
by chucktaylor
Wow, talk about 'what have you done for me lately?'
Brook, who just won his first world title (but isn't #1 in the division), deserves more respect than FMJ, the 47-0 multi-division champ who's been fighting at the championship level since 1998, because you rate Brook's recent win more highly than Floyd's...

Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 18:25
by licktheballs
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 18:41
by SNG
beatdown337 wrote:If you don't like Floyd, don't watch. Saying porter is a better win than maidana is silly.
Porter was a better scalp than Maidana.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 14 Sep 2014, 23:41
by macaca
Freedom2013 wrote:- When Kell Brook won the title from Shawn Porter, he didn't have a crooked ref protecting him from inside fighting and allowing him to clamp his opponent's arm
- Brook didn't demand Porter wear gloves with extra padding
- Brook was fighting IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY in his opponent's home country, something Floyd has NEVER had the courage to do
- Brook never pretended to be bitten when he wanted a rest or time to recover
- Brook never pretended to be pushed down to get the ref to deduct a point
- Brook doesn't beat up women (as far as I know)
Kell is a fairly decent guy and replies to his fans like yourself. Why don't you ask if he has beaten up any woman/women? To clear up your doubts on that issue you troll fornicate.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 10:48
by FloydtheDuck
Brook is a Bum
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 11:35
by danamba7
FloydtheDuck wrote:Brook is a Bum

Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 11:55
by Freedom2013
Mayweather void of killer instinct
http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/mayweat ... nct-261152
By Joe Koizumi
The highly anticipated rematch of Floyd Mayweather and Marcos Maidana was shown live here in Japan, and we hear many opinions and impressions—pro and con—on Money’s performance. Our boxing fans traditionally love aggressive fighters such as Fighting Harada or “Fierce Eagle” Yoko Gushiken (who kept his belt on thirteen occasions thanks to his furious aggression). We prefer hard-punchers or KO artists to artful dodgers. Problem is for what our fight fans come and see boxing by paying for tickets or by paying to cable televisions. People wish to buy “thrill” in return for money.
Mayweather’s showing of yesterday greatly disappointed our thrill-thirsty TV watchers—all around Japan. We had highly expected Floyd’s knockout victory this time since Marcos had a notorious weakness in the midsection shown in the first round against Amir Khan and also revealed in the process of yesterday’s rematch. This reporter, one of commentators, really wondered why Mayweather wouldn’t go out and bring home the bacon early like Joe Gans now that Maidana was apparently through in the middle of the lopsided contest. Floyd said, “Maidana bit my fingers, and my fingers were numb after the eighth round.” Should his fingers have been complete, could he or would he try to knock him out after the eighth? Probably he wouldn’t and couldn’t—because of his usual safety-first strategy.
Japanese fight fans already realized that it would be very unlikely to see a spectacular knockout in Mayweather’s fights any longer. Every hardcore boxing fan admit Floyd’s exceptional reflexes and superb defensive skills, but also admit Floyd’s knockout ratio is dropping in every bout—now 47-0, 26 KOs—so low as 55.3 percent. Mayweather will—soon or later—extend his unblemished mark to 49-0 like Rocky Marciano. But Marciano registered 43 knockouts therein to have his KO ratio 93.5 percent, while Money’s mark will be 49-0, 26 KOs, which makes the ratio lower to 53.0 percent since we cannot expect Mayweather’s triumph within the distance in the future.
When we carefully watch Floyd’s record, he scored only a couple of KO or TKO wins in his last ten fights from his De La Hoya bout to his latest Maidana rematch. In last ten years since his DeMarcus Corely bout in May 2004, Mayweather pitifully registered only five stoppages in fifteen bouts in total.
Mayweather, after piling up a comfortable lead on points, always decelerate his pace in order to distribute his stamina (he’s already thirty-seven) rather than to accelerate his attack to finish his opponent within the stipulated distance. He wouldn’t take a risk to score a KO win but only look for a safer victory. Great champions dared to show knockout victories to fully entertain the audience. Wilfredo Gomez, who registered seventeen defenses all by knockouts, always attempted to demolish his challenger since Bazooka believed he was destined to dispatch him in front of himself. Roberto Duran, who scored eleven knockouts in twelve defenses through his lightweight reign, swarmed over his challenger from the start and had the crowd satisfied with money’s worth.
In terms of thrill, excitement and entertainment, we may try to compare Mayweather with historically great welterweight forerunners such as Robinson, Napoles, Cuevas, Leonard, Hearns, Duran, Curry etc. We, of course, know only knockout isn’t boxing, but boxing without knockout is close to amateur boxing where people appreciate only speed and skills rather than thrill or power. But we may compare our impressions after watching Leonard or Hearns with ours after witnessing Mayweather. Regardless of hypothetical win or loss between Leonard and Mayweather or between Hearns and Mayweather—even though Money may be able to outmaneuver Leonard or Hearns with his tremendous reflexes—what Mayweather renders us is less exciting and less impressive than what Leonard or Hearns took a risk and tried to display to entertain the crowd.
With respect to defensive skills, Mayweather may be as great and excellent as Young Griffo, Willie Pep, Miguel Canto, Wilfredo Benitez or Pernell Whitaker—all at the prime. We whole-heartedly admire Mayweather’s excellence. With respect to offensive skills, however, Mayweather may be inferior to Robinson, Napoles, Cuevas, Leonard, Hearns, Duran, and Curry—even though Money once displayed such a masterpiece of halting Ricky Hatton in 2007. What a move he showed in delivering a left hook while quickly turning around in the corner! That’s a textbook counter that it might be hard even for many boxers to follow or imitate. But Mayweather wouldn’t display such a spectacular knockout again.
This observer greatly evaluates Mayweather’s exceptional speed and skills. But some of our people have become bored with his less spectacular showing without knockout. For our Japanese fight fans including non-hardcore fans, it is a pity to be forced to watch such a tedious performance without thrill and without knockout. Lately in every fight Floyd’s popularity is declining here in Japan simply because of his repeated failures to show a KO or TKO victory. Probably will there be no words of “Killer Instinct” in Mayweather’s dictionary. He may need a new dictionary.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 12:22
by Freedom2013
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 13:11
by Horse
beatdown337 wrote:If you don't like Floyd, don't watch. Saying porter is a better win than maidana is silly.
Not really.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:00
by NateJR
Horse wrote:beatdown337 wrote:If you don't like Floyd, don't watch. Saying porter is a better win than maidana is silly.
Not really.
I can't say that Porter has fought as good of competition has Madaina has. I'd say Porter and Madaina are about on the same level, both very good fighters.
But you'd have to be pretty delusional to say someone who just won their first World title (Brook) less than 6 month ago deserves more credit than a guy who has fought championship level opposition for the past 17 years.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:01
by DMA1987
Porter was a better scalp than Maidana. Mayweather is still the man.
Floydtheduck is an embarrassment. Is your life really that boring.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:11
by NateJR
DMA1987 wrote:Porter was a better scalp than Maidana. Mayweather is still the man.
Floydtheduck is an embarrassment. I mean, why even bother, if your life that boring.
A better scalp based on what? Beating Alexander?
Madaina has already accomplished more than Porter. It's not like the Madaina that fought Alexander was the same Madaina that fought Floyd, not by a long shot actually. I'd actually bet Madaina would beat Alexander in a rematch. Fighters have always went through different stages of their careers, Madaina was hinting at retirement and had no hunger around the time he fought Alexander (it was said before the fight and it showed!!). Now that Madaina is with the Garcia gym he's a rejuvenated fighter that's reaching the peak of his career.
Madaina
Porter
Algieri
Bradley
Alexander
Provodnikov
Garcia
Mattysse
Khan
Peterson
All of these fighters are on the same level and it basically comes down to styles and who's going to be on their A game on the night of the fight if you matched any of them up with each other.
Porter has done nothing that trumps what Madaina has done in his career other than beating Alexander and I don't see that as being a set in stone reason Porter is a better scalp than Madaina. Madaina has more experience and has fought the all around better opposition in the same aspect.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:33
by DMA1987
Dominating Alexander and ruining Malignaggi are probably both better than Maidanas best wins.
He is getting way too much credit for beating Broner.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:37
by Horse
NateJR wrote:I can't say that Porter has fought as good of competition has Madaina has. I'd say Porter and Madaina are about on the same level, both very good fighters.
Who be the favourite for Porter vs Maidana? There's not much in it.
NateJR wrote:But you'd have to be pretty delusional to say someone who just won their first World title (Brook) less than 6 month ago deserves more credit than a guy who has fought championship level opposition for the past 17 years.
Deserving of more credit for beating Porter than Mayweather should get for beating Maidana? In my opinion, yes.
Brook's career deserving more respect than Mayweather's career? I'd have to say no.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:38
by Horse
DMA1987 wrote:Dominating Alexander and ruining Malignaggi are probably both better than Maidanas best wins.
He is getting way too much credit for beating Broner.
Most of Maidana's respect comes from giving Mayweather a good fight the first time.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 16:40
by SNG
Horse wrote:DMA1987 wrote:Dominating Alexander and ruining Malignaggi are probably both better than Maidanas best wins.
He is getting way too much credit for beating Broner.
Most of Maidana's respect comes from giving Mayweather a good fight the first time.
Yep, that and beating a blown up Lightwelterweight.
Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 19:22
by Badhusker
Freedom2013 wrote:- When Kell Brook won the title from Shawn Porter, he didn't have a crooked ref protecting him from inside fighting and allowing him to clamp his opponent's arm
- Brook didn't demand Porter wear gloves with extra padding
- Brook was fighting IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY in his opponent's home country, something Floyd has NEVER had the courage to do
- Brook never pretended to be bitten when he wanted a rest or time to recover
- Brook never pretended to be pushed down to get the ref to deduct a point
- Brook doesn't beat up women (as far as I know)
Why only mention Brook? Why not say every boxer in the entire universe from the beginning of time deserves more respect?

Re: Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather
Posted: 15 Sep 2014, 19:53
by Freedom2013
Badhusker wrote:Why only mention Brook? Why not say every boxer in the entire universe from the beginning of time deserves more respect?
Almost true...
Only a very few like James Butler were worse slimebags than Floyd.