What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post Reply
TheGreatBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post by TheGreatBoxer »

What would you consider a "good" Amateur Record?.

How many fights?.
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post by Gazmac81 »

depends on what level they were at

think beofre turning pro like to see someone have 60 or over Amateurs fights ,

there are alot of young tournaments these days through so you could rack up 20 fights a season as a schoolboy to be honest.

hard to gage but to have a good recored then really means winning alot more than you lost i suppose.
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post by scallum »

60 to 100 fights imo
Tarquin Tarpaulin IV
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 461
Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 20:02

Re: What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post by Tarquin Tarpaulin IV »

Its difficult to determine what a good record is. Many mature juniors rack up a string of wins using brawn over brains only to get found out when things level out as they get older.
I've known senior boxers who've stopped 9 out of 10 and hung up their gloves after 18 months because they didn't enjoy the commitment and pressure. Good record?
I coached one lad who lost his first 10 bouts but only with a crystal ball would we have known that 7 of his opponents would go on to national honours!
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: What would you consider a "Good" Ameteur Record?.

Post by scallum »

Number of National Titles won and # of National Champions defeated could be factored In
Post Reply