BoxRec

Khan's not the brightest guy but it's silly to think he'll say he won't fight Floyd in the US.

I agree Amir those assholes are huge assholes.

I assume as anything would go with Floyd he'd fight him on the f#cking moon if that was the only option, but sure if he can get it in the uk he'd be down obviously.

khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

I am in shock that this isn't a Bnov thread...I guess verballistic is close enough though.

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

I read that story as well but he was interviewed ringside at Mayweather's fight.

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

Khan would fight Floyd on the White House lawn.

He is right about the anti-Muslim sentiment/profiling in the US. It's almost become a way of life for some people. The suspicion is also omni-present. It's very sad to see people treated that way.

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Khan would fight Floyd on the White House lawn.

He is right about the anti-Muslim sentiment/profiling in the US. It's almost become a way of life for some people. The suspicion is also omni-present. It's very sad to see people treated that way.

It's also very sad that people have been given good reason to feel that way in some cases.

Well it wasn't the Canadians who attacked the U.S. on 9-11.
And it isn't the Aussies who are proudly displaying neanderthal beheading videos.

If Khan has to endure extra scrutiny to enter the U.S., so be it.
If he's got any complaints, maybe he should address his pathetic Muslim brethren who are responsible for so many atrocities. Or has Khan conveniently forgotten this?
Hard to believe that some shed tears for these lunatics, or worry about Khan's sensitivities.

SenorPipino wrote:Well it wasn't the Canadians who attacked the U.S. on 9-11.
And it isn't the Aussies who are proudly displaying neanderthal beheading videos.

If Khan has to endure extra scrutiny to enter the U.S., so be it.
If he's got any complaints, maybe he should address his pathetic Muslim brethren who are responsible for so many atrocities. Or has Khan conveniently forgotten this?
Hard to believe that some shed tears for these lunatics, or worry about Khan's sensitivities.

Not this sh!t again. Like America has just been skipping rocks in the ocean in the middle east for all these years & randomly went apesh!t on us. If any country did to us what we've done in the middle east region there would be a lot more buildings collapsed & more heads chopped than anything that's been done to us.

reggaereggae wrote:

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

Well, that's just simply not true.

ReggieDiggs wrote:

SenorPipino wrote:Well it wasn't the Canadians who attacked the U.S. on 9-11.
And it isn't the Aussies who are proudly displaying neanderthal beheading videos.

If Khan has to endure extra scrutiny to enter the U.S., so be it.
If he's got any complaints, maybe he should address his pathetic Muslim brethren who are responsible for so many atrocities. Or has Khan conveniently forgotten this?
Hard to believe that some shed tears for these lunatics, or worry about Khan's sensitivities.

Not this sh!t again. Like America has just been skipping rocks in the ocean in the middle east for all these years & randomly went apesh!t on us. If any country did to us what we've done in the middle east region there would be a lot more buildings collapsed & more heads chopped than anything that's been done to us.

Yes, like more than 4,000 lives being snuffed out by deranged Muslim fanatics on 9-11 is simply "this shit again."
But as I said, it's hard to believe that some actually shed tears for these lunatics.
The next time these Middle Eastern savages opt to stage an attack, Mr. ReggieDiggs, believe me, they won't be too concerned with where your misguided heart and sad political ideals lie. You'll be decimated along with all the other casualties, a victim of the same lunatic fringe that you so callously defend with lame justifications.

Leather Daddy wrote: American people should feel ashamed of this racism, bigotry, and discrimination and make some sort of amends (reparation) to Muslims.

reparations?
Yeah right.
I got two words for you bro.

Its amazing how the Muslims who can command media attention , will use it to complain its not fair , i'm a muslim and everyone picks on me . But they don't use it to influence other Muslims on how bad the terrorists really are

SenorPipino wrote:Yes, like more than 4,000 lives being snuffed out by deranged Muslim fanatics on 9-11 is simply "this poo again."
But as I said, it's hard to believe that some actually shed tears for these lunatics.
The next time these Middle Eastern savages opt to stage an attack, Mr. ReggieDiggs, believe me, they won't be too concerned with where your misguided heart and sad political ideals lie. You'll be decimated along with all the other casualties, a victim of the same lunatic fringe that you so callously defend with lame justifications.

If I were to die in a terrorist act it would be both the terrorist group & the US governments fault. The US is involved in middle eastern affairs & killing middle eastern terrorists but also non-terrorists, women & children. The US governments actions have birthed these groups attacking us. You can't bully a people & not expect them to eventually strike back. Does the bully bear no responsibility when the kid whos been bullied for years by him & being unable to physically beat the bully pulls a gun on him & kills him?

Lenny Cravats wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

Well, that's just simply not true.

Denial - the leftist's last weapon. No facts. No point. Just 'that's not true'.

Does that approach work for you? I bet you're an astro-physicists aren't you?

reggaereggae wrote: Denial - the leftist's last weapon. No facts. No point. Just 'that's not true'.

Where are your facts, Mr Reggae?
A lot (vast majority) have been but it's wrong to say all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ents,_2014

Some disgusting comments on here. Remember, one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. I'm not condoning Muslim extremist action, just as i don't condone the actions of some western governments.

verballistic wrote:

danamba7 wrote:Some disgusting comments on here. Remember, one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. I'm not condoning Muslim extremist action, just as i don't condone the actions of some western governments.

What a lame, overused excuse > "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter".

If you consider Al Qaeda, ISIS or other Muslim terrorists as "freedom fighters" you are out of your freaking mind. They would gladly slash your throat from ear-to-ear just for being an "infidel" no matter how much you might try to kiss up to them as "freedom fighters".

As I said, I don't condone their actions. But the US aren't exactly innocent. I think you've been brainwashed by the western media. People seem to have a genuine issue with Muslims on this thread. My heritage is Tamil Sri Lankan. Sri Lanka has just come out of a 25 year civil war. Tamils (Hindus) are actually the ones who, ashamedly, started suicide bombing contrary to popular belief. Does that mean I should be stopped at airports? Khan has nothing to do with what religious extremists are doing.

maybe he keeps gettting stopped by security as hes carrying some leathel Glass in that Jaw of his

reggaereggae wrote:

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

funny how i never got my visa rejected or turned away on landing and i have a lot worse past than amir .as for the muslim being under more scrutiny i agree with especially on such a date ....

stevedoc wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

funny how i never got my visa rejected or turned away on landing and i have a lot worse past than amir .as for the muslim being under more scrutiny i agree with especially on such a date ....

They don't turn you away for having been a rent boy in the past, it's usually for more serious crimes or terrorism reasons.

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny

funny how i never got my visa rejected or turned away on landing and i have a lot worse past than amir .as for the muslim being under more scrutiny i agree with especially on such a date ....[/quote]


They don't turn you away for having been a rent boy in the past, it's usually for more serious crimes or terrorism reasons.[/quote][/quote]

i prefer the term gigolo myself and tell your dad he still owes me for letting him rim me and he never gave back the bullyboy dildo he up his rectum at the time ..

reggaereggae wrote:

stevedoc wrote:khan wasn't allowed into america two weeks ago on 11th september ,i'm sure if he was called bob jackson he'd of been allowed in with out any trouble ...

It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

Just recently 500 plus Palestinian innocent children were slaughtered by Israel, was that not Terror?

reggaereggae wrote:

Lenny Cravats wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
It was something to do with a recent criminal investigation actually. And as Muslims are committing every terrorist attack for the last few years, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be under more scrutiny.

Well, that's just simply not true.

Denial - the leftist's last weapon. No facts. No point. Just 'that's not true'.

Does that approach work for you? I bet you're an astro-physicists aren't you?

I'm a physicist, yes. In a broad sense, anyway. I have a physics degree and I teach physics. That probably qualifies me. What I also have is lots of examples of terrorist activities over the last few years that don't involve Muslims. Sort of fvcks your point up a bit.