Page 1 of 1

Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 24 Sep 2014, 18:54
by jameswilson
Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 24 Sep 2014, 19:38
by Manchester Hitman
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 24 Sep 2014, 20:09
by Taansend
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 24 Sep 2014, 20:16
by rio
Which one? Koki or Tomoki? Tomoki is definitely the better and younger of the two which is why I think it wont be him. Koki looks very suspect, hes won 3 of his past 4 fights by SD despite having home advantage.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 24 Sep 2014, 20:25
by Taansend
rio wrote:Which one? Koki or Tomoki? Tomoki is definitely the better and younger of the two which is why I think it wont be him. Koki looks very suspect, hes won 3 of his past 4 fights by SD despite having home advantage.
I was assuming Tomoki (El Mexicanito).

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 01:32
by lefty
Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 04:45
by mullenman
is there enough time to have it on the Froch undercard on the 31st of january??

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 07:36
by Andrew
I rate Kameda very highly from what I've seen and I think he will be too fast for McDonnell.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 07:42
by Taansend
lefty wrote:
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.[/quote]

Do you think they'd get more money fighting in the US or Mexico?

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 07:45
by Yes We Can
Taansend wrote:
lefty wrote:
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.
Do you think they'd get more money fighting in the US or Mexico?[/quote]

Jamie doesn't exactly bring money to the table. I don't care where the fight is, i tip my hat to the 2 fighters and the promoters making it happen especially Hearn as it is a very dangerous fight for a guy with a bet (even a paper one). Win this and Jamie is top3-4 P4P in this country.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:01
by Boxing Prospect
Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
IT actually CAN'T be in Japan. It'll be here or the US.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:05
by lefty
Boxing Prospect wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
IT actually CAN'T be in Japan. It'll be here or the US.
Who is Kameda promoted by?

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:08
by Boxing Prospect
In the US he's one of Haymon's guys. As far as Japan goes he's not licensed as his old Gym (Kameda Gym) have been stripped of their licenses, a situation that really fucked up the year for Koki and for Kohei Kono.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:11
by lefty
Boxing Prospect wrote:In the US he's one of Haymon's guys. As far as Japan goes he's not licensed as his old Gym (Kameda Gym) have been stripped of their licenses, a situation that really fucked up the year for Koki and for Kohei Kono.
Do you think it's more likely to be over here then versus the US?

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 12:44
by Boxing Prospect
Not sure, I think it depends whats on the table for Haymon. For what it's worth Kameda will come cheaply unless Haymon has big plans for.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 14:41
by Crease
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 15:47
by Boxing Prospect
Crease wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.
Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 17:34
by expe
Boxing Prospect wrote:
Crease wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.
Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight
John McDonald trying to pronounce that...

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 27 Sep 2014, 08:09
by palooka
Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight[/quote]
John McDonald trying to pronounce that...[/quote]

:OhYes: 'Pluggaaahhh'

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Posted: 27 Sep 2014, 13:46
by Boxing Prospect
Panomroomglek won yesterday so don't be shocked if that's announced. There had been speculation last year that Tabtimdaeng would fight Payano so maybe last nights result threw a spanner in somewhere...