BoxRec

Let's get a boycott on this fight, make a stance to Eddie and Sky!

I voted no. I'd watch it if it was on Sky Sports, but not worth spending extra money to watch it.

Some poll that is when the only options are ones to support your argument and so cannot possibly give a true result of the fans on this forums feelings.

How about
No, because I do not want to and am not that interested.
Or No, because I am going out and have other plans
or just simply NO!

ILikeBeer wrote:I voted no. I'd watch it if it was on Sky Sports, but not worth spending extra money to watch it.

this is not a must see bout and neither are PPV class boxers.

Not a cat in hells chance.

tobyh5 wrote:Some poll that is when the only options are ones to support your argument and so cannot possibly give a true result of the fans on this forums feelings.

How about
No, because I do not want to and am not that interested.
Or No, because I am going out and have other plans
or just simply NO!

Fair point, plenty of people won't be actually taking a stand when they don't buy it.

I still voted No though, as I will be boycotting

I'll watch it in the pub,not paying 15 nicker for a glorified british title fight.

Bad decision by sky. Not worthy of ppv.

They will try and hype the sh1t out of this but i think it will bomb in terms of box office sales.

Didn't B o x n a t i o n show the first fight free?

I think it will be a cracking fight. I've been waiting for the rematch for a long time.

I'd rather watch a competitive fight than a set up.

And Tony and Nathan lost recently but to two of the most in-form fighters in world boxing...no disgrace in that.

A PPV bout is between Kovalev and Stephenson not Cleverley and Bellew, though Kovalev v Adonis would most likely be seen on B allegedly.

should be a few more poll options

Where is the option for - No I won't pay £15.00 to watch it but I may try and find some sh1te stream on the PC just to watch it because I'd still like to watch it but the fight itself doesn't justify PPV and the undercard will be stacked high with shite fights

Froch Cleverly i would yes, Bellew Cleverly Not a chance

Not paying for it, I'll stream it.

Big mistake by all concerned. They've handed FW a lifeline. He'll fight back now throwing this debacle back in their faces at every opportunity. I would hope that OUR magazines , Boxing News and Boxing Monthly get behind the fans and make a comment in support.

Froch v Cleverly...?

chiggsy wrote:I'll watch it in the pub,not paying 15 nicker for a glorified british title fight.

I might do that if a pub purchased it.

I'd rather spend £30 watching it in the pub, then £15 giving it to Sky. It's more the principle of the thing. And, after Hearn getting greedy, I'd rather the publican get my money than Matchroom/Sky.

I won't be buying it. Neither is going to go too far at cruiser and I sincerely believe Cleverly is just in it for the money.

froch cleverly? news to me this?

J wrote:froch cleverly? news to me this?

I think it's silly of Cleverly to have signed a fight with Froch. I mean, granted, Froch is in a lower weight division, but I feel Cleverly should be concentrating on Bellew, before signing other fights.

Froch vs Cleverly?

I think it is very unlikely to happen. Froch has never (to the best of my knowledge) given any inclination that he would leave the Super Middleweight Division. And Cleverly has just signed to fight Bellew at Cruiserweight (two weights above Froch).

This fight is a non-starter if we are to be honest.

ILikeBeer wrote:

J wrote:froch cleverly? news to me this?

I think it's silly of Cleverly to have signed a fight with Froch. I mean, granted, Froch is in a lower weight division, but I feel Cleverly should be concentrating on Bellew, before signing other fights.

I think you like beer too much; Cleverley hasn't signed to box Froch - the topic headline is wrong that's all.

palooka wrote:

ILikeBeer wrote:

J wrote:froch cleverly? news to me this?

I think it's silly of Cleverly to have signed a fight with Froch. I mean, granted, Froch is in a lower weight division, but I feel Cleverly should be concentrating on Bellew, before signing other fights.

I think you like beer too much; Cleverley hasn't signed to box Froch - the topic headline is wrong that's all.

FFS, did you really think I actually believed Froch was going to fight Cleverly?

No sense of humour anybody here.

You can just imagine what Glyn would have made of this ha

palooka wrote:

ILikeBeer wrote:

J wrote:froch cleverly? news to me this?

I think it's silly of Cleverly to have signed a fight with Froch. I mean, granted, Froch is in a lower weight division, but I feel Cleverly should be concentrating on Bellew, before signing other fights.

I think you like beer too much; Cleverley hasn't signed to box Froch - the topic headline is wrong that's all.

Either you haven't got the sarcasm, or this is a double bluff sarcastic post.