Al Haymon - NBC sports
Posted: 03 Oct 2014, 10:59
Pretty interesting development. http://www.BS.com/kathy-duva-o ... rts--82757
It's interesting though huh. Was part of Haymon's thinking behind doing this deal, to get one over on Duva for the lawsuit?pugilisticprofessor wrote:Just a few months ago Main Events was suing Haymon, jesus christ.
Nevermind. It's due a seperate thread of it's own anyway. It's quite a big development.fergusg wrote:http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... 2#p4067242lefty wrote:Pretty interesting development. http://www.BS.com/kathy-duva-o ... rts--82757
If Haymon was wanting to get some retribution against Main Events then Hopkins wouldn't be fighting Kovalev. That fight was made the lawsuit dropped and Duva has powerful promoter to make fights with. But that isn't to say Haymon isn't contravening the Ali Act, just it doesn't seem anyone cares enough to force a prosecution.lefty wrote: It's interesting though huh. Was part of Haymon's thinking behind doing this deal, to get one over on Duva for the lawsuit?
I didnt know that Haymon manages/advises Hopkins? I thought Hopkins was self managed.ttornado wrote:If Haymon was wanting to get some retribution against Main Events then Hopkins wouldn't be fighting Kovalev. That fight was made the lawsuit dropped and Duva has powerful promoter to make fights with. But that isn't to say Haymon isn't contravening the Ali Act, just it doesn't seem anyone cares enough to force a prosecution.lefty wrote: It's interesting though huh. Was part of Haymon's thinking behind doing this deal, to get one over on Duva for the lawsuit?
He isn't signed with Haymon in the same way other (lesser!) fighters are, but Hopkins calls him a close friend. Hopkins also declared his loyalty to Haymon after the Shumenov fight, http://www.BS.com/bernard-hopk ... lev--76940lefty wrote: I didnt know that Haymon manages/advises Hopkins? I thought Hopkins was self managed.
Haymon most likely tried to block Hopkins v Kovalev: http://thaboxingvoice.com/haymon-out-pl ... s-in/28799ttornado wrote:If Haymon was wanting to get some retribution against Main Events then Hopkins wouldn't be fighting Kovalev. That fight was made the lawsuit dropped and Duva has powerful promoter to make fights with. But that isn't to say Haymon isn't contravening the Ali Act, just it doesn't seem anyone cares enough to force a prosecution.lefty wrote: It's interesting though huh. Was part of Haymon's thinking behind doing this deal, to get one over on Duva for the lawsuit?
It isn't clear the Kovalev fight was attempted to be blocked by Haymon. But most careful observers could see that the Stevenson fight was being blocked, which forced the Kovalev fight .ALI wrote:Haymon most likely tried to block Hopkins v Kovalev: http://thaboxingvoice.com/haymon-out-pl ... s-in/28799
http://www.BS.com/?m=show&opt= ... e&id=80628"But they didn't understand that I already had a deal to fight Kovalev. Nobody thought I was going to fight Kovalev. Even the other side, they thought it was a bluff. Somebody tried to call my bluff and it got called. But it got called against them [Team Stevenson] and not me. At the end of the day - they were anticipating that I was going to give up the title and the young guy who fought Campillo, who is on his last legs, was going to beat by the youngster and then the youngster was in line to fight [Mohumaddi] for the IBF title."

The issue isn't anything with quite so much gravitas as government corruption. People just don't like Heymon because he is reticent to work with other promoters and because he's put a lot of his high-profile fighters in squash matches for promotional purposes lately. It's not so much corruption, it's just crap matchmaking that's bad for fans of the sport.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:That's how I feel about all this Haymon hate. Boxing fans and announcers have submitted to corruption by commission, belt organization and established promoters. However, some people are trying to portray Haymon as this boogeyman. How about we fix the things we ALL KNOW are fucked up before we focus on Haymon?
It's like the idiots who ignore blatant government corruption while searching for the Illuminati.
ttornado wrote:
You mean, fixing things like sending Lamon Brewster out with one eye & misplacing the test results, mebbe? Or fixing the removal of all competitive boxing to PPV, with non-PPV being used for televised executions featuring theBad Intentions wrote:That's how I feel about all this Haymon hate. Boxing fans and announcers have submitted to corruption by commission, belt organization and established promoters. However, some people are trying to portray Haymon as this boogeyman. How about we fix the things we ALL KNOW are fucked up before we focus on Haymon?
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Yes, Haymon is no angel. But you guys are describing things that other promoters have been doing for years.
I'm not defending him. If it were up to me, there'd be no promoters or leeches by other names.Datsue wrote:BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Yes, Haymon is no angel. But you guys are describing things that other promoters have been doing for years.
Everyone else gets it. As they should. They're slime.
Guess what? He's slime too.
So why the leap to defend him?
The focus is all on of them, but Oscar and Bob give regular interviews and show some accountability through speaking public.BAD INTENTIONS wrote: I'm not defending him. If it were up to me, there'd be no promoters or leeches by other names.
All I'm saying is that there is a high level of focus on Haymon as if these problems aren't completely prevalent.
The focus should be on all of them.
Typical BS ... just because two liars sit and talk to you, you feel more comfortable even though you know they are lying.ttornado wrote:The focus is all on of them, but Oscar and Bob give regular interviews and show some accountability through speaking public.BAD INTENTIONS wrote: I'm not defending him. If it were up to me, there'd be no promoters or leeches by other names.
All I'm saying is that there is a high level of focus on Haymon as if these problems aren't completely prevalent.
The focus should be on all of them.
Haymon has stayed consistently in the shadows, so of course speculation around his aims will be greater. From what we know he does pay his fighters well and takes a smaller manager percentage than the standard cut. But on the negative side is Brewster, and now Taylor.
I'd hope the guys who are promoters are more prolific interviewers. At the end of the day despite all the play he gets Al is a manager. You won't see a lot of pure manager interviews in general so this ain't even that odd a thing.ttornado wrote: The focus is all on of them, but Oscar and Bob give regular interviews and show some accountability through speaking public.
Haymon has stayed consistently in the shadows
How many managers have Haymon's influence?I'd hope the guys who are promoters are more prolific interviewers. At the end of the day despite all the play he gets Al is a manager. You won't see a lot of pure manager interviews in general so this ain't even that odd a thing.
No clue what that has to do with managers not really doing interviews. About the only guy I can recall seeing interviewed more than once is that obese guy who managed/s Tim & a lot of other promising guys who usually eff with TR.crusader wrote:How many managers have Haymon's influence?I'd hope the guys who are promoters are more prolific interviewers. At the end of the day despite all the play he gets Al is a manager. You won't see a lot of pure manager interviews in general so this ain't even that odd a thing.