Page 1 of 1

Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 13 Oct 2014, 13:20
by PokerRob
On the BoxRec Super Bantamweight rankings that is... Seems rather random lol

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?

Posted: 13 Oct 2014, 13:38
by stevedoc
very strange ,i was just checking the p4p ratings and kell brook is rated @12 and rigo @ 48 ..... hows that work

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?

Posted: 13 Oct 2014, 15:02
by ikorolev
fergusg wrote:My guess… Guillermo Rigondeaux hasn't boxed an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating points within 18 months… and today is that anniversary (i.e. versus Nonito Donaire on the 13th April, 2013), which may be the reason why he dropped 200 points since his last fight.
Ward hasn't either. Is his rating dropping ?

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 13 Oct 2014, 16:19
by ikorolev
Cool. Where are you finding old point counts ?

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 13 Oct 2014, 17:13
by ttornado
fergusg wrote: Enable "ratings" on each fighters bout list page to view their points history and then compare the stats to the current points totals in the P4P page.
I hadn't tried that before, good tip.

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?

Posted: 17 Oct 2014, 13:56
by ikorolev
fergusg wrote:My guess… Guillermo Rigondeaux hasn't boxed an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating points within 18 months… and today is that anniversary (i.e. versus Nonito Donaire on the 13th April, 2013), which may be the reason why he dropped 200 points since his last fight.
Quillin's last fight against an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating in October of 2010, but I don't see that his rating has fallen.

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 17 Oct 2014, 21:20
by Lackeos
fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 17 Oct 2014, 22:04
by ikorolev
Lackeos wrote:fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.
Nah, he missed the fact that 18 months is not always 568 days :)

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?

Posted: 18 Oct 2014, 16:33
by Lackeos
ikorolev wrote:
Lackeos wrote:fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.
Nah, he missed the fact that 18 months is not always 568 days :)
It's actually never 568 days. I'm pretty sure 18 months can never be more than 550 days, and, on average, is about 548.