Hall Vs. Caballero - Home advantage?
Posted: 26 Oct 2014, 08:00
I remember a big thing being made about home advantage when it was announced that Hobson had won the purse bids for Hall Vs. Caballero. Fans were slating Matchroom for not gaining home advantage for many of their fighters in world title fights and they were praising Hobson for putting up a lot of money to stage this fight. It was rumoured to be happening in Sheffield on the 18th of October but then was changed to the Monte Carlo show.
I'm sure we'd all agree that it was a great scrap and Stuey fought out of his skin (again.) It was a much closer fight than we had all anticipated and it seems like the general consensus is that Caballero nicked it by a few rounds (much closer than the 118-110 scorecard from one of the judges.) Both men come out of it with their stock raised.
My question is: do you think the crowd could have given Hall that extra 10% needed to win the close rounds if the fight had happened over here? I know Hall's not a massive ticket seller and the arena wouldn't have been sold out but I was at the Malinga fight and the Butler fight and he does have a rowdy bunch of supporters. I'd say it would have made a difference and I'm disappointed it wasn't over here.
I'm sure we'd all agree that it was a great scrap and Stuey fought out of his skin (again.) It was a much closer fight than we had all anticipated and it seems like the general consensus is that Caballero nicked it by a few rounds (much closer than the 118-110 scorecard from one of the judges.) Both men come out of it with their stock raised.
My question is: do you think the crowd could have given Hall that extra 10% needed to win the close rounds if the fight had happened over here? I know Hall's not a massive ticket seller and the arena wouldn't have been sold out but I was at the Malinga fight and the Butler fight and he does have a rowdy bunch of supporters. I'd say it would have made a difference and I'm disappointed it wasn't over here.