Re: Heavyweight title to remain fragmented?
Posted: 09 Nov 2014, 00:29
Forget about the heavyweights, still lots of great fights out there.
That's fine, because Deontay's hype won't help him in the ring against Stiverne, so Deontay will not ever possess that belt.fergusg wrote:The implications of this is the potential for the heavyweight championship to remain fragmented should Deontay Wilder capture the WBC crown from Bermane Stiverne, because the American is an Al Haymon fighter and they don't have their fights televised by HBO!
Amen.stevedoc wrote:wladimir is the champ no matter what the belts say...
I don't think you have to be too concerned because it's unlikely Wilder beats Stiverne, unless the Canadian takes him lightly.fergusg wrote:ESPN are reporting that Wladimir Klitschko has signed a three-fight contract to have his contests aired by HBO, starting with the Pulev bout.
The implications of this is the potential for the heavyweight championship to remain fragmented should Deontay Wilder capture the WBC crown from Bermane Stiverne, because the American is an Al Haymon fighter and they don't have their fights televised by HBO!
Im aware that Haymon does not have a good relationship with Bob Aru (Top Rank), but can you provide me with a source to show he doesnt have a good relationship with HBO?fergusg wrote:Part of the reason why Golden Boy Promotions re-established a working relationship with Top Rank and HBO, is due to the fact that they now have an extremely limited roster of fighters (that are not controlled by Al Haymon).PokerRob wrote:HBO has started doin business again with Golden Boy, Al Haymon has a lot of fighters contracted to him who also have promotional contracts with Golden Boy... Is there not a chance HBO will decide to do business with Haymon in the future?
Bob Arum, Kathy Duva and I also believe that Oscar De La Hoya have all accused Al Haymon of stealing GBP fighters, whilst the cross-dressing Golden Boy was in rehab.
Most of the GBP stable of fighters are either on a fight-by-fight contract, they have no contract or their contract is due to expire quite soon. And regardless the nature of the contract, Al Haymon directly controls the fighters and can “advise” them to turn down superficially good opportunities.
So in simple terms, Al Haymon seems reluctant to do business with Top Rank or HBO, which means that his fighters won’t be allowed to “cross the street”.
Exactly, I see no reason why we couldnt have Wilder vs Klitscho on HBO and promoted by K2 Promotions, it would have nothing to do with Top Rank!ikorolev wrote:If Haymon disallows Wilder to fight Klitchko, Wilder should sue him and leave him. That POS should not be allowed to manage boxers.
Yes, he also has bad relations with Roc Nation (something to do with Beyonce) as well as Top Rank... But to the best of my knowledge, its only these two Promotional Outfits that he refuses to do business with (and perhaps vice versa in Top Ranks case), even though fighters adviced/mamaged by Haymon has fought on Top Rank bills in the past!fergusg wrote:Here’s an illustration of the sort of power that Al Haymon holds over his fighters…ikorolev wrote:If Haymon disallows Wilder to fight Klitchko, Wilder should sue him and leave him. That POS should not be allowed to manage boxers.
• According to ESPN, Roc Nation Sports offered Deontay Wilder and his manager Jay Deas $2M for a fight with Bermane Stiverne as part of a five-fight deal. Apparently Al Haymon refused to consider the offer.
• Roc Nation then offered Keith Thurman a three-fight contract worth $6 million. Thurman would have gotten a $2 million advance against the total package. The offer was declined by the Al Haymon managed fighter.
• Peter Quillin dumped his WBO world title after Roc Nation won a fight purse that would have earned him a career high of $1.4m ($500K more than GGG's best purse). It is believed that Quillin dropping the title was a move orchestrated by Haymon to keep Jay Z out of his business.
Your 100% right there my friend, it certainly was before the so called 'Cold War'... But time are getting exciting, apparently its over now, and Golden Boy are promoting on it again...fergusg wrote:When was the last time an Al Haymon managed fighter fought on a fight card that was televised by HBO, where the contest didn’t involve an anonymous boxer where the bout was the direct result of a purse bid? It has to be before the proverbial “Cold War” began?PokerRob wrote:Exactly, I see no reason why we couldnt have Wilder vs Klitscho on HBO and promoted by K2 Promotions, it would have nothing to do with Top Rank!ikorolev wrote:If Haymon disallows Wilder to fight Klitchko, Wilder should sue him and leave him. That POS should not be allowed to manage boxers.
Yeah totally forgot about that one sorry... I guess the question is then...fergusg wrote:Kathy Duva (Main Events) sued Al Haymon recently and accused him of performing all sorts of dodgy shenanigans that presented a very real risk to his empire.PokerRob wrote:Yes, he also has bad relations with Roc Nation (something to do with Beyonce) as well as Top Rank... But to the best of my knowledge, its only these two Promotional Outfits that he refuses to do business with (and perhaps vice versa in Top Ranks case), even though fighters adviced/mamaged by Haymon has fought on Top Rank bills in the past!fergusg wrote:Here’s an illustration of the sort of power that Al Haymon holds over his fighters…
• According to ESPN, Roc Nation Sports offered Deontay Wilder and his manager Jay Deas $2M for a fight with Bermane Stiverne as part of a five-fight deal. Apparently Al Haymon refused to consider the offer.
• Roc Nation then offered Keith Thurman a three-fight contract worth $6 million. Thurman would have gotten a $2 million advance against the total package. The offer was declined by the Al Haymon managed fighter.
• Peter Quillin dumped his WBO world title after Roc Nation won a fight purse that would have earned him a career high of $1.4m ($500K more than GGG's best purse). It is believed that Quillin dropping the title was a move orchestrated by Haymon to keep Jay Z out of his business.
I too have read this, and although a possibility, I just dont see him completely shutting out Showtime and HBO!fergusg wrote:
Al Haymon has recently signed a contract with NBC Sports, which commences in January, which Kathy Duva (Main Events) believes that:
"He's promised NBC that' he's going to take his fighters off premium cable ... He's going to put Showtime and HBO out of the puzzle… And he's going to do away with pay per view and create an over-the-top network. He's got the fighters and he's presumably got the money. I wish him the best and I totally and sincerely mean it. ... I pray he doesn't blow it, because if he does, we're not going back to (network TV for a while.) If he's successful, all the networks will want boxing."
Therefore, it seems that Haymon’s agenda is to ensure NBC Sports will be televising his fighters fights, rather than have any involvement with HBO.
After doing a bit of research and getting down to the nuts and bolts of things, it would appear that HBO ceased relationships with Golden Boy due to them not being pleased with Mayweather jumping ship to Showtime... Which would appear to be mainly down to Haymon!fergusg wrote:Al doesn’t work with HBO… or is it a case of HBO doesn’t work with Al Haymon (since they initially ended their working relationship with him due to GBP jumping ship to Showtime)?PokerRob wrote:I too have read this, and although a possibility, I just dont see him completely shutting out Showtime and HBO!fergusg wrote:
Al Haymon has recently signed a contract with NBC Sports, which commences in January, which Kathy Duva (Main Events) believes that:
"He's promised NBC that' he's going to take his fighters off premium cable ... He's going to put Showtime and HBO out of the puzzle… And he's going to do away with pay per view and create an over-the-top network. He's got the fighters and he's presumably got the money. I wish him the best and I totally and sincerely mean it. ... I pray he doesn't blow it, because if he does, we're not going back to (network TV for a while.) If he's successful, all the networks will want boxing."
Therefore, it seems that Haymon’s agenda is to ensure NBC Sports will be televising his fighters fights, rather than have any involvement with HBO.
If he does, and his contract with NBC commences in Jan, it will be interesting to see what will happens in regards to Wilder vs Stivern! Which is currently being penciled in for Jan 17th!
Al Haymon does work with Golden Boy, but only if the fights are televised by Showtime. I believe the working-relationship is frosty.
Al Haymon does have an excellent relationship with Yvon Michel, the promoter of the GYM Group who look after Stevenson and co-promote Jean Pascal. Haymon also has fighters signed with Goossen Tutor Promotions & DiBella Entertainment.
In regards to Wilder vs. Stiverne… Bermane is a Don King fighter and his fighters are allowed to fight on any TV network. Deontay is an Al Haymon fighter promoted by GBP, which means his fights can be aired by any TV network not named HBO.
It’s interesting that there’s no official announcement from Golden Boy about the date for the Wilder vs. Stiverne fight, which may have something to do with Haymon’s deal with NBC (as it would be a big fight for that network).
I don’t believe that Haymon can shut-out Showtime completely, as fighters like Floyd Mayweather still hold contracts with them. That being said, I see no reason for Haymon to start doing business with HBO though, since he hasn’t worked with them for such a long time.
The bottom line is this:
Al Haymon + HBO or Top Rank or Roc Nation or Main Events (TBC) = No fight
Yeah, I was speaking hypothetically in regards to the purse bids. Still, Im curious as to what would happen if Wilder vs Klitschko did go to purse bids (hypothetically speaking of course) and Golden Boy/Haymon won the purse bids and decided to televise it on Showtime. What then would happen in regards to Klitschko's 3 fight deal with HBO? Would he be able to defer from his 3 fight contract with HBO or have to vacate his titles?fergusg wrote:Why would Klitschko versus Wilder go to purse bids? If Deontay challenges Stiverne and captures the WBC title, why would the other organisations make him the mandatory challenger for Klitschko's belts (or vice versa)?PokerRob wrote:After doing a bit of research and getting down to the nuts and bolts of things, it would appear that HBO ceased relationships with Golden Boy due to them not being pleased with Mayweather jumping ship to Showtime... Which would appear to be mainly down to Haymon!
"Translation: HBO is very angry about the defection of Mayweather to Showtime last month but is much more outraged by how it went down under Haymon’s autocratic rule, which Golden Boy head Richard Schaefer began to mimic in other dealings with HBO."
Source = http://www.examiner.com/article/hbo-say ... -al-haymon
So yeah, if Klitschko has a 3 fight promotional deal with HBO, and Wilder remains loyal to Haymon, it would appear unlikley that we will see this fight being made in Klitschko's next 3 fights! Unless both parties (Haymon and HBO) agree the fight is too big to get in the way of political differences, or if it goes to purse bids?!?
Thats a point actually... If Klitschko vs Wilder goes to purse bids, and Golden Boy wins the bid, Golden Boy would then probably decide to televise the fight on Showtime (as Wilder is a Haymon fighter). Would this then revoke (or temporarily revoke) Klitschko's television deal with HBO and allow him to fight Wilder on Showtime (probably on US soil)???
Nothing would revoke Klitschko's contract with HBO, so we shouldn't expect him to see him become available to "potentially" have his fights televised by Showtime until he has competed in three contests.
One of the ways that Klitschko would be able to fight Deontay Wilder, is if Showtime & Al Haymon can agree to joint promote & televise the fight with HBO. The last and only time that happened was for the Tyson-Lewis super fight... and no contest has been deemed big enough (yet) to provide a compelling financially-lucrative reason to motivate Showtime & HBO to work together again.
The only alternative is for Haymon and Showtime to allow Wilder to "cross the street" out of the kindness of their own heart (or receive a one-off payment from HBO and/or K2), which I cannot see happening.
Simply put, we aren't going to see a Klitschko-Wilder fight for quite some time!
fergusg wrote:According to ESPN, Roc Nation Sports is on the verge of finalizing a deal to buy Gary Shaw Productions… and one of the biggest names affiliated to that promotion is Bryant Jennings.
Therefore, assuming that Deontay Wilder can capture the WBC version of the heavyweight championship from Bermane Stiverne next month, which is far from certain, there is no possibility whatsoever that he will be in a position to challenge the winner of the Klitschko-Jennings fight, because of Haymon’s refusal to work with either HBO (Wladimir) or Roc Nation (Bryant).
They are a necessary evildavie wrote:fergusg wrote:According to ESPN, Roc Nation Sports is on the verge of finalizing a deal to buy Gary Shaw Productions… and one of the biggest names affiliated to that promotion is Bryant Jennings.
Therefore, assuming that Deontay Wilder can capture the WBC version of the heavyweight championship from Bermane Stiverne next month, which is far from certain, there is no possibility whatsoever that he will be in a position to challenge the winner of the Klitschko-Jennings fight, because of Haymon’s refusal to work with either HBO (Wladimir) or Roc Nation (Bryant).
Why don't boxing promoters just eff off and die!!!!!
It isn't necessary that they are all evil thoughtiny_acres wrote:They are a necessary evildavie wrote:fergusg wrote:According to ESPN, Roc Nation Sports is on the verge of finalizing a deal to buy Gary Shaw Productions… and one of the biggest names affiliated to that promotion is Bryant Jennings.
Therefore, assuming that Deontay Wilder can capture the WBC version of the heavyweight championship from Bermane Stiverne next month, which is far from certain, there is no possibility whatsoever that he will be in a position to challenge the winner of the Klitschko-Jennings fight, because of Haymon’s refusal to work with either HBO (Wladimir) or Roc Nation (Bryant).
Why don't boxing promoters just eff off and die!!!!!
That's a given Blodhemn.Blodhemn wrote:Pretty sure the title belongs to Wlad.
And then we'll have Regular, Interim, and Silver world champs. I think the WBA has 1-2 other champs than Wlad. There's never going to be a time where Wlad will hold all the titles. No one ever will.davie wrote:That's a given Blodhemn.Blodhemn wrote:Pretty sure the title belongs to Wlad.
But it would just be nice, for once, to have all 4 belts in the possession of the unquestionable top man in the division.
Just stick Stiverne in the ring with Wlad and be done with it.