Page 1 of 1
how many fights?
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 18:17
by buzz
Does anyone know how many fights are on this Saturday at the Men?
Re: how many fights?
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 18:19
by REAL_DEAL
Misqiq Chris says look below

Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 18:19
by bennie
Eight fights (courtesy of Britishboxing.net)
FIGHT #1 – 18.45 HRS
6 X 3 Minute Rounds Featherweight Contest
ANDY MORRIS vs. JUS WALLIE
FIGHT #2 – 19.10 HRS
8 X 3 Minute Rounds Welterweight Contest
MATTHEW HATTON vs. MATT SCRIVEN
FIGHT #3 – 19.40 HRS
6 X 3 Minute Rounds Light-Middleweight Contest
PAUL SMITH vs. JASON COLLINS
FIGHT #4 – 20.05 HRS
6 X 3 Minute Rounds Middleweight Contest
GARY LOCKETT vs. MATT GALER
FIGHT #5 – 20.30 HRS
8 X 3 Minute Rounds Light-Middleweight Contest
MATTHEW MACKLIN vs. TBA
FIGHT #6 – FLOATER
4 X 3 Minute Rounds Light-Middleweight Contest
MATTHEW HALL vs. ISIDRO GONZALES
FIGHT #7 – 21.05 HRS
THE WBU MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP OF THE WORLD
12 X 3 Minute Rounds at 11st 6lb (160lb)
ANTHONY FARNELL vs. TBA
SKY LIVE TRANSMISSION COMMENCES AT 22.00 HRS
FIGHT #8 – 22.15 HRS - LIVE
THE WBU LIGHT-WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP OF THE WORLD
12 X 3 Minute Rounds at 10st (140lb)
RICKY HATTON vs. CARLOS VILCHES
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 18:23
by bennie
Oh, sorry, Chris. You beat me to it.
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 18:50
by Wales
what about kev mitchell?
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 19:03
by buzz
surely its gonna be kev Mitchell v Peter Buckley

Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 19:10
by Wales
be a step up wouldnt it
Posted: 08 Jun 2004, 20:45
by dondada
Wales wrote:be a step up wouldnt it
Spot on.
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 06:26
by steve richards
I wonder why the pulled Matt Galer out against Elcock and put him in with Lockett, I recon they are stitching Elcock up

, Macklin is in with Bobby Bangar i think, Bangar looks good for about 2 rounds then gets tagged and runs like a mad man, This card is a fuckin shambles is was going to put IMO but i think its in everyones opinion, be interested to see how many people are there

Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 06:28
by buzz
Well i'm not going watching this crock of shit

Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:23
by bugs
Didn't Kevin Mitchell fight last weekend? I know he was supposed to fight both, but isn't that reliant on last weekend's result (which I don't know).
He is supposed to be pretty good.
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:26
by J
he ius but its too hard to gauge against the level of (non) opponent he has been fighting.
precocious talent would be the best way to describe him I think
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:34
by glittermonkey
J wrote:precocious talent would be the best way to describe him I think
I don't know, i'd have gone for talented, arrogant, undermatched potential Warren cash-cow.
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:37
by J
i quite like him
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:47
by glittermonkey
Don't get me wrong, i don't dislike him. He just leaps about like he's just knocked out Morales after every win. He must know he's fighting well below his ability, so why does he celebrate like he does? He'll probably grow out of it (he's just a kid, after all), and the sooner that happens, the better.
As i've said before it's the way he's being matched that bothers me. Got to go to football, so i don't have time to elabourate.
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:50
by J
yeah but he is 19 jeez Im a pain in the arse now let alone when I was 19 so I sympathise with him, youthful exhuberence..enjoy your game!

Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 11:54
by jamesmcdonnell
Yeah I'm sure it's just unbridled enthusiasm, he looks like a guy who loves fighting...
Posted: 09 Jun 2004, 12:05
by KOJOE90
Putting Kevin Mitchell in with Peter Buckley sounds fair to me.