Page 1 of 1
Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 16 Nov 2014, 12:24
by Ettt9350
Would Andre Ward v Carl Froch sell out Wembley stadium?
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 16 Nov 2014, 12:27
by Syntax Error
Yes, absolutely.
Froch is now popular with casual boxing fans, thanks to the two Groves fights & bit of googling would tell them all they need to know about Ward & what he represents to Froch's legacy.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 16 Nov 2014, 13:49
by Andrew
More chance of the pope converting to Islam that this fight happening.
As. UK fight fan not sure it does the Groves fight was two Brits in a rematch of an amazing first fight that was big anyway plus he controversial stoppage and Georges mind games was the reason that fight was big
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 16 Nov 2014, 14:33
by expe
Naandrew wrote:More chance of the pope converting to Islam that this fight happening.
As. UK fight fan not sure it does the Groves fight was two Brits in a rematch of an amazing first fight that was big anyway plus he controversial stoppage and Georges mind games was the reason that fight was big
Froch's drawing power seems to have been overestimated based on the second Groves fight, the fight sold, not Froch or Groves as fighters. The stoppage and needle between them allowed Sky to spin it into something massive and even then it didn't sell out Wembley. Ward's completely unknown, in the grand scheme of things Froch is still a bit of a nobody to the general public and based on the first fight, they'd struggle to sell a fight between him and Ward. It would probably sell out the City Ground, but wouldn't come close to Wembley, Groves II was a one off, it would take a fighter with a fanbase like Hatton's to sell like that again.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 16 Nov 2014, 17:48
by cobbler80
Only if the undercard featured Scott Quigg defending his 'world title' against an average Jap
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 17 Nov 2014, 19:49
by IRLangmaid25
I think the Carl Froch-Andre Ward fight could sell well at Wembley but handsome Eddie is going have to stack the card pretty damn deep to make it happen. Froch is the division's number 1 attraction etc, but post World War II record only went because of the contraversial nature of his first fight with George Groves that made it the sell that it is. The only way we could have a sold Wembley Stadium was if Handsome Eddie had this as a card (money no object and no politics etc).
Carl Froch v Andre Ward
Kell Brook v Amir Khan or Frankie Gavin
James DeGale v George Groves 2
Anthony Joshua v Gary Cornish
Jamie McDonnell v Randy Caballero
Kevin Mitchell v Anthony Crolla
For example that just six off the top of my head
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 10:05
by saad muhammad
I would imagine the 50,000 wembley casual's wouldn't even know
who Ward is !
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 16:02
by Monte Fisto
Maybe, would really need the fighters to sell the fight, however I don't think that's wards bag.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 16:03
by Rodian
Ward would rather be an actor than boxer. He's better off anyway. Ward needs to be taken off the P4P lists ASAP
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 18:16
by BAD INTENTIONS
saad muhammad wrote:I would imagine the 50,000 wembley casual's wouldn't even know
who Ward is !
Hey guys, you know that boxer Carl Froch we are all crazy about?
Yeah, we love Carl!
Anyone knows the name of the guy who easily beat Froch?
Umm, no. We thought Froch started boxing against a guy named Bute. We don't have the internet or any resource we could use to check Carl's record.
If someone were to tell you that Carl is trying to get revenge against a guy who beat him easily a few years back, would be interested in seeing the fight?
No, we want Groves/Froch III, IV, and V.
I think GB would love to host Ward/Froch II.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 18:38
by TheWigwam
I've never understood the clamour for a rematch, it will be a boring 12 shut out for Ward surely? :)
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 19:06
by Ettt9350
fergusg wrote:TheWigwam wrote:I've never understood the clamour for a rematch, it will be a boring 12 shut out for Ward surely? :)
1) Ward deserved to beat Froch, but it wasn't "easy"
2) Ward turned down the chance to rematch Froch in the UK, but refused because he didn't want to travel
3) Froch is much more popular than people believe... and the stats proves that he's one of the top five commercial fighters on the planet!
4) The Ward-Froch rematch isn't going to happen.
5) Ward is irrrlevant, because he hasn't defeated a top-tier world-class super middleweight for three years and there is currently no prospects of him fighting in the short-term
6) Froch can earn bigger paydays against other fighters
7) Stop talking about Andre Ward!
I wasn't aware that Matchroom offered Andre Ward a rematch with Froch in the UK?
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 21:44
by Bobbyptsd
Why should Ward have to travel to fight a guy he already beat?
I mean, it might not be the best financial decision, but I can't see why from a fan's perspective we would expect him to leave California if he doesn't want to.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 22:13
by Bobbyptsd
fergusg wrote:Bobbyptsd wrote:Why should Ward have to travel to fight a guy he already beat?
I mean, it might not be the best financial decision, but I can't see why from a fan's perspective we would expect him to leave California if he doesn't want to.
Two reasons: Froch has already faced Ward in his hometown and the American should have returned the favour; and Froch-Ward fight would have been a much more financially-lucrative event staged in the UK.
He should have? News to me. I didn't figure etiquette counted for much here.
I'd agree with the second point, as I said it might not be the best decision not to, financially.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 22:29
by Bobbyptsd
I know he fights almost uniquely in California, so?
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 00:30
by Badhusker
If this fight isn't scheduled, stfu. If it is, any fight between these two is good.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 10:27
by expe
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:saad muhammad wrote:I would imagine the 50,000 wembley casual's wouldn't even know
who Ward is !
Hey guys, you know that boxer Carl Froch we are all crazy about?
Yeah, we love Carl!
Anyone knows the name of the guy who easily beat Froch?
Umm, no. We thought Froch started boxing against a guy named Bute. We don't have the internet or any resource we could use to check Carl's record.
If someone were to tell you that Carl is trying to get revenge against a guy who beat him easily a few years back, would be interested in seeing the fight?
No, we want Groves/Froch III, IV, and V.
I think GB would love to host Ward/Froch II.
If you think it works like that you're seriously naive.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 12:32
by KBB
Good fight but Ward beats him easily, probably no sell out at Wembley though and even if it is I can guarantee that it won't be because it's Andre Ward, they'll be coming to see the Cobra.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 12:47
by SNG
fergusg wrote:Bobbyptsd wrote:Why should Ward have to travel to fight a guy he already beat?
I mean, it might not be the best financial decision, but I can't see why from a fan's perspective we would expect him to leave California if he doesn't want to.
Two reasons: Froch has already faced Ward in his hometown and the American should have returned the favour; and Froch-Ward fight would have been a much more financially-lucrative event staged in the UK.
Didn't they fight in Atlantic City rather than California?
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 13:01
by Taansend
If Froch Groves II had been as exciting as Froch Groves I then YES*, it would sell out Wembley.
But the 'big fight' fan (casuals as you lot call them) didn't enjoy the rematch as much as they (or Eddie) hoped.
* - of course, if it had been that exciting we'd be seeing Froch Groves III
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 13:06
by expe
SNG wrote:fergusg wrote:Bobbyptsd wrote:Why should Ward have to travel to fight a guy he already beat?
I mean, it might not be the best financial decision, but I can't see why from a fan's perspective we would expect him to leave California if he doesn't want to.
Two reasons: Froch has already faced Ward in his hometown and the American should have returned the favour; and Froch-Ward fight would have been a much more financially-lucrative event staged in the UK.
Didn't they fight in Atlantic City rather than California?
Nearly 3,000 miles from Oakland
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 13:48
by Crease
saad muhammad wrote:I would imagine the 50,000 wembley casual's wouldn't even know who Ward is !
Unfortunately that's true enough. I argued with a man about The Super Six a few weeks ago and he was convinced that Carl Froch had won it. And then mentioned Bute as his opponent in the final.
I think it's a shame,considering how talented a boxer that he is, but it's no one's fault but his own, his inactivity is damaging to the sport. And this reasoning of his
"
I can't get a fight because no will fight me"
It only washes for so long. Even other top fighters across the weights manage to find viable opponents, look at the likes of Golvkin, Rigondeaux & Terrence Crawford.
Re: Ward v Froch at Wembley
Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 13:53
by Crease
Rodian wrote:Ward would rather be an actor than boxer. He's better off anyway. Ward needs to be taken off the P4P lists ASAP
Agreed. Inactivity should damage every boxers ranking... I still remember a year or two back when David Haye received heavy criticism for his inactivity, and there were calls for him to be withdrawn from the rankings...
Consistency is important...