Page 1 of 3
TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 11:03
by Tuan_Jim
Terry O'Connor, AKA 'The Real Meal'! What he doesn't know about refereeing could fit in the British Boxing Board of Control's 'Rules of Boxing' handbook. This man has more 1st round KOs than Mike Tyson - and he's still hungry.
Howard 'The Hemophobiac' Foster! The best finisher in boxing! Knocked down? It's over. Wobbled? It's over. None of the above? It's still over! Howard glides around that ring like he was covered in slime, and can rightly claim to be the first man to ever stop George Groves.
Boxing fans, we all know and admire the work of Terry O'Connor and Howard Foster. We cheer and applaud every time we see them introduced as referee before a big and important fight. But of course you can have too much of a good thing, and so I ask you, which referee would you like to retire permanently, in perpetuity, from boxing forever?
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 11:56
by Bard of Boxrec
Tuan_Jim wrote:Terry O'Connor, AKA 'The Real Meal'! What he doesn't know about refereeing could fit in the British Boxing Board of Control's 'Rules of Boxing' handbook.
O'Connor has a long line of heinous offences. Until recently Howard Foster hadn't done an awful lot wrong.
It's O'Connor for me. The guy just doesn't know how to do his job, either as a referee or a judge.
Off the top of my head
Calzaghe/Manfredo early stoppage
Fury/McDermott robbery
Kovalev/Cleverly late stoppage, 'changed my mind' stoppage and carrying Cleverly back to corner
Khan/Prescott late stoppage
There will be a load more though
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 12:43
by deadpan
TOC by a landslide points decision. 114-114.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 12:50
by MightyWarrior
TO'Connor wins
Foster dramatically waves it off as Terry ducks through the ropes on his way to the ring
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 13:24
by steve689
The Board made Mickey Vann retire because he reached the stipulated age yet he's still refereeing in Ireland and is as fleet-footed and on the ball as ever. How can he be deemed unfit to officiate when that cumbersome lard bucket O'Connor is still blubbering around the ring?
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 13:50
by brian13
If this was O Connor -V- Ian John Lewis then fair enough but why the hell are we comparing O' Connor and Foster? Terry O Connor is absolute joke and has always been terrible, Howard Foster just has a bad call here and now but he is a solid referee.
The board should have got rid of O' Connor after Fury / Mc Dermott I and yet he is still around being an awful referee and judge.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 13:58
by gobbles
Ian John-Lewis is the worst British ref/judge by some way
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 14:40
by Bodyshot3
"Ladies and Gentleman, your judges at ringside tonight are...........Adelaide Byrd, Fernando Laguna and Terry O'Connor.
And for those of you still in the house, wishing to view this farce....your timekeeper is Mr. Sun Dial from Korea."
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 14:42
by whiskey
gobbles wrote:Ian John-Lewis is the worst British ref/judge by some way
To be fair, he allowed Shannon Briggs to be almost beaten to death by Vitali.
He must score points back for that ?
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 14:47
by Rexob
Both very experienced and distinguished boxing people
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 14:58
by brian13
Bodyshot3 wrote:"Ladies and Gentleman, your judges at ringside tonight are...........Adelaide Byrd, Fernando Laguna and Terry O'Connor.
And for those of you still in the house, wishing to view this farce....your timekeeper is Mr. Sun Dial from Korea."
That is the not the worst at all. The judges could be Ian John Lewis or Terry O Connor , CJ Ross & Gale Van Hoy and the referee could be emile tiedt and Jim Watt is the commentator for the fight.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 15:08
by Bodyshot3
That is the not the worst at all. The judges could be Ian John Lewis or Terry O Connor , CJ Ross & Gale Van Hoy and the referee could be emile tiedt and Jim Watt is the commentator for the fight.
Common son, was having a laugh and gave it a whirl
No credit for my inept Korean timekeeper gag???
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 15:09
by handsofstone
Bodyshot3 wrote:That is the not the worst at all. The judges could be Ian John Lewis or Terry O Connor , CJ Ross & Gale Van Hoy and the referee could be emile tiedt and Jim Watt is the commentator for the fight.
Common son, was having a laugh and gave it a whirl
No credit for my inept Korean timekeeper gag???

Well played sir
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 15:41
by The Law
As per the other thread, please refrain from posting any potentially defamatory comments about the referees. By all means criticise them if you want but please don't post libellous allegations

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 16:40
by mickey1975
As the great Bobby Vanzie said, after punching a window in in his dressing room after been blatantly robbed against Graham Earl "That Terry O'Connor needs sorting out "
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 16:47
by billy nelson
Howard would be in my top 2 refs in the UK
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 17:16
by handsofstone
billy nelson wrote:Howard would be in my top 2 refs in the UK
Victor Loughlin's THE man
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 18:13
by charliebox324
billy nelson wrote:Howard would be in my top 2 refs in the UK
At Last Billy.Someone Who Knows What He Is Talking About.Thinks Some Posters On Here Should Get In Touch With British Boxing Board.Thats If They Can Get Out Of The Armchair And Off The Computer Keyboard.Adios
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 24 Nov 2014, 18:51
by Finn
I think both are very decent. Yeah they've had some off nights but on the whole I think they are decent. I also don't think it was the shocking judging by O'Connor that people are going on about, one judge had a large landslide victory for Bellew, the other had it very close. Clev was outlanding Bellew for the 1st 9 rounds. I wouldn't personally score those crappy jabs though.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 01:05
by crusader
A bit strong there
Foster seems to be a solid ref apart from his tendency to stop fights early, but some of his stoppages (like Degale-Periban) have been WTF bad. I think he panics when he sees that someone is hurt.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 01:10
by gazza8
TOC is that good he has already scored the fury chisora fight barring a KO
117-111 Fury
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 06:59
by MightyWarrior
To be fair, unlike O'Connor, Howard Foster is a decent ref - he's just unlucky enough to have made a high profile gaff in the first Froch/Groves fights - all ref's makes mistakes, even the very best. It wasn't a terrible error, as in home town / suspect or a badly late stoppage ( the worst ) it was just slightly bad timing, because GG did look just about finished at that the moment, but he definitely deserved the benefit of the doubt....
And the stoppage on Sat night wasn't awful, but on the back of his GG stoppage it just added to the impression of a ref who panics at the first sign of a fighter in trouble ( and DeGale's opponent certainly was in trouble ) to be fair to Foster, the first punch DeGale landed looked a finisher, then the 2nd punch on his way down looked a sickener too, so he rushed his decision a bit...but he doesn't deserve massive stick for it in hindsight.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 08:15
by crusader
MightyWarrior wrote:And the stoppage on Sat night wasn't awful, but on the back of his GG stoppage it just added to the impression of a ref who panics at the first sign of a fighter in trouble ( and DeGale's opponent certainly was in trouble ) to be fair to Foster, the first punch DeGale landed looked a finisher, then the 2nd punch on his way down looked a sickener too, so he rushed his decision a bit...but he doesn't deserve massive stick for it in hindsight.
I don't agree with this. Periban was hurt but I don't think anything he got hit with looked like a finishing blow or a 'sickener'. He was also up fairly quickly, though I guess that means little given that Foster never counted. That was the first time Periban looked hurt and Foster gave him no chance of showing that he was okay, so in this case I think it was a very poor decision to stop the fight as quickly as he did.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 08:17
by lefty
crusader wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:And the stoppage on Sat night wasn't awful, but on the back of his GG stoppage it just added to the impression of a ref who panics at the first sign of a fighter in trouble ( and DeGale's opponent certainly was in trouble ) to be fair to Foster, the first punch DeGale landed looked a finisher, then the 2nd punch on his way down looked a sickener too, so he rushed his decision a bit...but he doesn't deserve massive stick for it in hindsight.
I don't agree with this. Periban was hurt but I don't think anything he got hit with looked like a finisher or a 'sickener'. He was also up fairly quickly, though I guess that means little given that Foster went to stop it as soon as he hit the canvas. That was the first time Periban looked hurt and Foster gave him no chance of showing that he was okay, so in this case I think it was a very poor decision to stop the fight as quickly as he did.
I agree. One thing i would say that was quite telling though was that Periban didnt seem to protest really which can be a good indicator that the fight was pretty badly hurt.
Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?
Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 08:18
by lefty
Ian John Lewis is by far the worse. These two make some clangers at times but he's in a league of his own.