Page 1 of 2
allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 10:19
by Fatsam
Just wondered if anyone knew how the online streaming was for allegedly, dont have sky so camt subscribe through the telly, was going to subscribe for a month on BN if the streams were decent and stable.
cheers
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 11:25
by Gazmac81
my mate has it on his Tablet had no complaints.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 11:26
by TheLeprechaun
You talking about legal streams?
The weigh in was streamed in fairly high quality
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 11:50
by palooka
TheLeprechaun wrote:You talking about legal streams?
The weigh in was streamed in fairly high quality
Nudge nudge wink wink
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 11:52
by Boxerbeetle
I've not heard any criticism of the online service, so I reckon you'll be ok.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 11:55
by DazDiCanio
Speak with @StuartHow on twitter. He watches BN on his tablet/devices all the time. He will be able to answer any questions regarding quality etc. Nice lad too.

Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 12:51
by rhino222
I am the master fisherman on here!
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 12:54
by The Law
The BN legal stream is good quality.
Guys, please do not mention any illegal streams on this forum. I know you have been well behaved so far

Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 13:10
by whiskey
TBH i think most have bought the subscription for this month, Kovalev vs Hopkins, Pacquiao, now this card.
Only those out of the country will be fishing in slow running rivers.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 13:26
by Fatsam
Nice one all
cheers
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 14:01
by rhino222
The Law wrote:The BN legal stream is good quality.
Guys, please do not mention any illegal streams on this forum. I know you have been well behaved so far

nothing illegal about my streams where I go fishing, water is very clear, if the water runs murky I just find another one where the fish will bite. I have an environment agency licence, so no issue there at all.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 15:10
by gobbles
I got the app on my phone for a month when I was away from home for a fight. Was very good quality and don't believe there was a sign up fee.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 15:55
by celerygolf
Get yourself an android box with xmbc for a one off payment of about £125 and never worry about streams again ever!!! Always watch premiership 3pm kick offs and ppv all in hd.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 16:23
by tobyh5
And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 17:29
by rhino222
tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 17:38
by Mimmy
pm me for a lovely flowing stream
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 17:39
by Mimmy
by the way it has plenty of sticklebacks and tadpoles in it but does not had chinese subtitles.
(im only kidding ya knows)
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 17:47
by rd350lc
tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
makes you wonder how terrestrial tv ever managed to show boxing for around 50 years , doesn't it ?
I think people would pay a average sum without moaning , but object to being ripped off
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 17:50
by lefty
rd350lc wrote:tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
makes you wonder how terrestrial tv ever managed to show boxing for around 50 years , doesn't it ?
I think people would pay a average sum without moaning , but object to being ripped off
Could have something to do with the fact that the internet wasnt around for about 30 of those years atleast lol
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 18:04
by Boxing Prospect
rd350lc wrote:tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
makes you wonder how terrestrial tv ever managed to show boxing for around 50 years , doesn't it ?
I think people would pay a average sum without moaning , but object to being ripped off
What's it cost to watch all the fights televised in the UK? £600? £700?
I know it's different in different countries but the sport has free to air fights in Thailand and Japan, heck the final 2 days of this year is packed with Japanese action on free TV over there. Makes me wonder how they can do that yet we pay through the nose to follow our sport.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 18:05
by rd350lc
lefty wrote:rd350lc wrote:tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
makes you wonder how terrestrial tv ever managed to show boxing for around 50 years , doesn't it ?
I think people would pay a average sum without moaning , but object to being ripped off
Could have something to do with the fact that the internet wasnt around for about 30 of those years atleast lol
No but SKY and sattelite TV came along and changed sport for good and took it away from the masses !
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 18:07
by rd350lc
600 or 700 hundred quid a year is an awful lot of money to me and i'd sooner take my kids on holiday once a year and just watch what bits i can .
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 18:14
by crusader
tobyh5 wrote:I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
What is your take on people doing it when it's not possible for them to legally purchase viewership?
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 28 Nov 2014, 21:20
by GooalaShooola
tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
Exactly this. allegedly (which will know doubt be changed to 'allegedly' for some banterful reason) is something that all boxing fans should support. It's an absolute godsend & anybody who refuses to pay £12 a month is a short-sighted knob in my opinion.
Re: allegedly online streams
Posted: 29 Nov 2014, 00:54
by TheLeprechaun
GooalaShooola wrote:tobyh5 wrote:And the end result of everyone doing illegal streams is the business failing and then no more boxing on the TV and we will all be pissed off then.
I do not understand illegal steaming and never have. It is theft for one but also only hurting ourselves longterm.
Exactly this. allegedly (which will know doubt be changed to 'allegedly' for some banterful reason) is something that all boxing fans should support. It's an absolute godsend & anybody who refuses to pay £12 a month is a short-sighted knob in my opinion.
Paying 12 a month is fair for the most part.
Paying close to 20 quid for the likes of Bellew vs Cleverly and some of the absolutely insulting PPVs that Adam Smith has served up is another matter entirely.
I feel no guilt for streaming those piles of sh*t and will do so in future.