BoxRec

LOCATION - O2 Arena (Millenium Dome), Greenwich, London, United Kingdom

MAIN CARD (BoxN 8pm) -

Billy Joe Saunders vs. Korobov/Lee winner (10pm Start Time)
Dereck Chisora vs. Michael Sprott
Chris Eubank jnr vs. Anthony Fitzgerald
Lewis Pettitt vs. James Dickens

UNDERCARD (BoxN 5pm) -

Frank Buglioni vs. Gevorg Khatchikian
Bradley Skeete vs. Mate Hornyak
Mitchell Smith vs. Jon Kays
Dillian Whyte vs. Paul Butlin

PRELIMS (Untelivised 3pm)

local names used to sell tickets and as tv filler for later on the card.

Tyson?

mullenman wrote:Tyson?

FW could use Tyson to headline a card up north either in Manchester or Liverpool (ideally against David Price) and throw all of his northern talent on that card...

That would be a great card. I cant see it happening.

I like Buglioni v Camacho.

Fitzer v Eubanks is a no contest considering what Spike done to him in Dublin 2 weeks ago. Would like to see Spike in with Eubanks. Spike took Billy Joe the distance to.

MrJasonM wrote:That would be a great card. I cant see it happening.

I like Buglioni v Camacho.

I cant see it happening either mate. Doubt FW is scouring these forums looking for ideas, unfortunately.
Its more about how i'd like to see BN structure a card along with a few fun match ups i'd like to see...

fighting_irish wrote:Fitzer v Eubanks is a no contest considering what Spike done to him in Dublin 2 weeks ago. Would like to see Spike in with Eubanks. Spike took Billy Joe the distance to.

Eubank jnr vs. Fitzgerald is more about getting Eubank jnr back in the win column and setting up the Spike fight straight after.
Eubank jnr vs. O'Sullivan would be a really fun fight to watch i reckon...

wesshaw1985 wrote:

fighting_irish wrote:Fitzer v Eubanks is a no contest considering what Spike done to him in Dublin 2 weeks ago. Would like to see Spike in with Eubanks. Spike took Billy Joe the distance to.

Eubank jnr vs. Fitzgerald is more about getting Eubank jnr back in the win column and setting up the Spike fight straight after.
Eubank jnr vs. O'Sullivan would be a really fun fight to watch i reckon...

Yep, I'd stick Eubank in with O'Sullivan now, dont think he needs the confidence boost of Fitzgerald.

I'd also stick Skeete in a special 2pm slot, just so I don't have to watch him again.

Beyond that, solid card, would definitely watch.

wesshaw1985 wrote:

fighting_irish wrote:Fitzer v Eubanks is a no contest considering what Spike done to him in Dublin 2 weeks ago. Would like to see Spike in with Eubanks. Spike took Billy Joe the distance to.

Eubank jnr vs. Fitzgerald is more about getting Eubank jnr back in the win column and setting up the Spike fight straight after.
Eubank jnr vs. O'Sullivan would be a really fun fight to watch i reckon...

Why should he? He's had a dozen Latvians prior to
Saunders. Spike is a much better fight

Looks nice, but methinks no attention has been paid to fighter wages. Getting some of those guys to travel would mean there was no way the card made a profit

DazBoxingFan wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:

fighting_irish wrote:Fitzer v Eubanks is a no contest considering what Spike done to him in Dublin 2 weeks ago. Would like to see Spike in with Eubanks. Spike took Billy Joe the distance to.

Eubank jnr vs. Fitzgerald is more about getting Eubank jnr back in the win column and setting up the Spike fight straight after.
Eubank jnr vs. O'Sullivan would be a really fun fight to watch i reckon...

Why should he? He's had a dozen Latvians prior to
Saunders. Spike is a much better fight

Its just a way of thinking my friend. I believe over a certain level a winner should be matched with a winner and a loser with a loser. Just my meaningless opinion...

thepocketrocket wrote:Looks nice, but methinks no attention has been paid to fighter wages. Getting some of those guys to travel would mean there was no way the card made a profit

Agreed on the Korobov front.
Do you think Leapai and Camacho jnr would be that expensive?

wesshaw1985 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Looks nice, but methinks no attention has been paid to fighter wages. Getting some of those guys to travel would mean there was no way the card made a profit

Agreed on the Korobov front.
Do you think Leapai and Camacho jnr would be that expensive?

For second and third string fighters on the card, yes. Maybe not if they were topping

That is why Mismatchroom have so many big fighters on their bills, but most of the opponents are shite.

I like the card BTW

thepocketrocket wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Looks nice, but methinks no attention has been paid to fighter wages. Getting some of those guys to travel would mean there was no way the card made a profit

Agreed on the Korobov front.
Do you think Leapai and Camacho jnr would be that expensive?

For second and third string fighters on the card, yes. maybe not if they were topping

That is why Mismatchroom have so many big fighters on their bills, must most of the opponents are shite.

I like the card BTW

your right brother.
It'll probably cost most of the budget getting the title fight over here for BJS.
Probably switch Alex Laepai for Michael Sprott and Hector Camacho jnr for Gevorg Khatchikian.

MrJasonM wrote:That would be a great card. I cant see it happening.

I like Buglioni v Camacho.

You what?

WelshJack wrote:

MrJasonM wrote:That would be a great card. I cant see it happening.

I like Buglioni v Camacho.

You what?

I think they mean Hector Jr not Wadi,i thought the same

wesshaw1985 wrote: Probably switch Alex Laepai for Michael Sprott and Hector Camacho jnr for Gevorg Khatchikian.

Economics. Still, I would rather have less Mismatchroom fighters on the bill and better opponents. Maybe not killers as that is bad matchmaking, but well known, decent names which will teach the guys something.

I have always said, as soon as a fighter has to start talking up how good is opponent is, you know that he is going to be pretty much shit (at that particular level)