Page 1 of 1

BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 06:42
by dalcumly
The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.

Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders, he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 06:45
by DazDiCanio
Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 07:43
by REEVE
i dont like the fact hes in the ring - i know myself that theres no way my trainer would let anyone else in the ring putting off the boxer while hes trying to corner (ex world champion, dad or otherwise) this is boxing :box: not wwf!

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 08:10
by bripez
DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 08:12
by tobyh5
bripez wrote:
DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?
Very good point

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 08:16
by thepocketrocket
bripez wrote:
DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?
That is why the board need to take action.

Still it is pretty funny. If Euwank Jnr had a proper trainer saying proper things in the first four rounds he may have won!!

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 08:19
by Parson Cross
I know it was bad - but nothing compared to the number of people chewing Liam Walsh's ear in the corner ! All shouting over each other. Mayhem.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 08:24
by whiteboy
Snr mentioned after the previous fight where he got into the ring that he had cleared it with the board...

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 09:00
by cobbler80
The worst bit was when Ronnie Davies was told to stop talking when he was telling Jr he needed to knock him out

I'd have walked off there and then if i was Ronnie. He deserves better than being mugged off like that

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 09:16
by dalcumly
Although I'm being critical of Eubank snr in this thread it doesn't take away from my view that he is one of the best British boxers in the last 50 or so years, he was certainly one of the toughest.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 09:17
by palooka
It was all part of the illusion/marketing that Jnr was a natural, didn't need advice and that Snr and Ronnie Davies had so much confidence in his ability they didn't need to be concerned with giving advice and direction. That has been shown to be a conceit; Jnr is not the second coming of Charlie Burley and the set up for other boxers at his level and above ought to be good enough for him; people put a lot of time and effort into being accredited so they can be in the ring and deliver advice, if Snr wants to do that he ought to go through the same process.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 09:36
by Gaz_73
dalcumly wrote:The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.
Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders,
he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.
Harsh.

There was a remarkable improvement in Junior's sitting, after Snr's interjection.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 09:41
by palooka
Gaz_73 wrote:
dalcumly wrote:The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.
Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders,
he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.
Harsh.

There was a remarkable improvement in Junior's sitting, after Snr's interjection.
:)

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 10:01
by broomy7s
Dave Coldwell also tweeted....

'Dear BBBofC - please don't tell me I have to wear tracksuit bottoms in the corner again.'

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 13:44
by Rexob
Who gives a toss, I though it was pretty funny him posing and his son 5 rounds down hilarious!

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 16:12
by handsofstone
I remember in 1 of Jr's earlier fights when Sr started entering the ring,he was told to change before he got in and he did

So i dont know why now he's getting away with it

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 07 Dec 2014, 18:30
by Slim Cockney
The Board's rules apply to the lesser people.

New rules, a new administration and a new outlook is required.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 07 Dec 2014, 19:27
by TheLeprechaun
Eubank Sr is the only person who Chris Jr. will listen to im sure.

Once Eubank Sr actually started talking to him and telling him what to do in the second half of the fight, I thought Eubank Jr dominated.

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 07 Dec 2014, 20:28
by gobbles
Who cares? I take it that mean you can't wear T-shirts either, as many do

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 08 Dec 2014, 05:55
by coneye
palooka wrote:It was all part of the illusion/marketing that Jnr was a natural, didn't need advice and that Snr and Ronnie Davies had so much confidence in his ability they didn't need to be concerned with giving advice and direction. That has been shown to be a conceit; Jnr is not the second coming of Charlie Burley and the set up for other boxers at his level and above ought to be good enough for him; people put a lot of time and effort into being accredited so they can be in the ring and deliver advice, if Snr wants to do that he ought to go through the same process.
Very true , and what they did was convince everyone except Jnr ,, because for the first 6 rnds he looked like a rabbit in the headlights , , he actually looked like he did'nt want to be there , he was stiff slow ponderous , Then at sometime he woke up and decided to have a go , if he had done that in the first 6 he may have won , but then again he may off gassed out .

What he needed to be told from his dad , because he obviously will not listen to anyone else , was apply the pressure . But Dad was too busy posturing in the corner , thinking its about him not Jnr .

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 08 Dec 2014, 12:51
by TopGun
I wish everyone would stop moaning, it makes it more entertaining. I love the whole Eubank Snr story. I love the fact he doesn't say anything in the corner, it's great TV!! :bag:

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Posted: 08 Dec 2014, 16:20
by coneye
Thats excatly what it is GREAT TV ,, but its not what you pay for GREAT BOXING MATCHES , . . i want great tv i'll watch reruns of the Simpsons . Enjoy it while it lasts , because the way Jnr fights and the way snr acts , i doubt if promoters will want to work with them for much longer , UNLESS jnr learns how to box better.

Then if you want to watch comedy you will have to go hang around Brighton on sunday mornings , and wait for the monoculed one to do his daily strutt up the esplanade