If Khan wins Saturday...
Posted: 10 Dec 2014, 18:24
Should he get a Floyd fight?
What do you need me for ... Khan is a :global star".Riddick Blowe wrote:Paging BAD INTENTIONS
Khan at 154Badhusker wrote:In order for Khan to win, hopefully he makes weight. He recently said in an interview he was sitting there at 151, and said he was 3 pounds over. Good thing he has someone else that is a little smarter helping him make weight.
Exactly.Badhusker wrote:No. Alexander was beaten by Porter, so unless he KO's him or something like an absolute shutout, he may be on Porter's level, but no higher. He needs a win against a top 5 guy with a belt so he can bring something to the table, imo.
There are millions of muslims in Europe. Soon one could count some European countries as muslim onesverballistic wrote:You're trying to make him sound like Manny Pacquiao...fergusg wrote:Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your point of view… Amir Khan really is a global star! I think the fact that he’s the first-ever Muslim British Pakistani major world champion means that he has a sizeable fan base that may be disproportionate to his boxing talent and his charisma deserves.Badhusker wrote:No. Alexander was beaten by Porter, so unless he KO's him or something like an absolute shutout, he may be on Porter's level, but no higher. He needs a win against a top 5 guy with a belt so he can bring something to the table, imo.
In simple terms, Amir Khan brings an awful lot of global media coverage and overseas revenue to any potential super-fight he competes in.
Therefore, whether he deserves it or not, he’s one of the bigger draws of all fighters competing in the 140lb to 154lb weight range!
And let’s not forget that boxers are known as “PRIZE” fighters, not “PRIDE” fighters, which means that "money" often speaks louder than "credibility"!
Pro boxing isnt that big of a sport in the Arab/Muslim world...how many Muslim nations like Pakistan even televise Khan's bouts or any other pro boxing for that matter? I know they occasionally have pro boxing cards in UAE or Egypt, but that's about it. Naz was way more popular in UK and had a larger global following than Khan does.
So I have to disagree that Khan brings that many TV viewers(or live fans) to the table. How many traveling UK fans follow Khan across the pond like they followed Naz or Hatton?
Like it or not, Adrien has won titles in 3 divisions. Thats impressive even with the title bonanza we got going on nowadays.CheckHook wrote:Maidana got a Floyd fight for beating Broner, so it clearly doesn't take much to get a Floyd fight....
Broner was a over hyped mediocre boxer who's best win at 147 was an old Malignaggi.... I don't think he was an impressive scalp at 147 in the slightest, but each to their own.ReggieDiggs wrote:Like it or not, Adrien has won titles in 3 divisions. Thats impressive even with the title bonanza we got going on nowadays.CheckHook wrote:Maidana got a Floyd fight for beating Broner, so it clearly doesn't take much to get a Floyd fight....
No one knew who the f#ck Marcos was & those fights did around 850k-950k from most reports I saw. There are less big options to cross that 1 million threshold, but there are maybe a dozen guys that get to that 700k-950k mark imho. Hell I think with the right angle Floyd vs Jermain Taylor for a middleweight strap can be one of those that surpassed that 1 mill mark (if he didn't have this shooting case going on anyway). I think the September fight is the one that needs to be big though if that is to be his "last one". First off knowing boxers its unlikely to be his last one, but if it were to be his last he goes out big & if he's not done it makes him more valuable to re-sign for another fight or two.Ricky_ wrote:If Floyd continues to duck Pacquiao then it doesn't leave Floyd with much. Not alot of people are sold on Brook even though he's the other title holder, and Khan is a much, much bigger draw.
I don't see any other fighter Floyd can face now other than Khan or Pacquiao.
If winning three belts in three divisions as a 23 year old isn't impressive to you idk what to tell you. That alone puts him into a small category of professional boxers. You can certainly diss Adrien for many reasons & you can argue the belts are watered down, but you can't argue with results in particular at such a young age or that he's still doing sh!t that people aren't doing even when its watered down.CheckHook wrote:Broner was a over hyped mediocre boxer who's best win at 147 was an old Malignaggi.... I don't think he was an impressive scalp at 147 in the slightest, but each to their own.ReggieDiggs wrote:Like it or not, Adrien has won titles in 3 divisions. Thats impressive even with the title bonanza we got going on nowadays.CheckHook wrote:Maidana got a Floyd fight for beating Broner, so it clearly doesn't take much to get a Floyd fight....
I'm stating that one controversial win over an old Paulie Malignaggi is not what I would call a good 147lb resume. If beating the guy that beat Malignaggi in a close fight gets you a shot at Floyd then you don't need to do much to get a fight with Floyd. That seems pretty obvious to me. Even Broner knows he doesn't belong at welter, that's why he wants to campaign at 140lb.ReggieDiggs wrote: If winning three belts in three divisions as a 23 year old isn't impressive to you idk what to tell you. That alone puts him into a small category of professional boxers. You can certainly diss Adrien for many reasons & you can argue the belts are watered down, but you can't argue with results in particular at such a young age or that he's still doing sh!t that people aren't doing even when its watered down.
ReggieDiggs wrote:No one knew who the f#ck Marcos was & those fights did around 850k-950k from most reports I saw. There are less big options to cross that 1 million threshold, but there are maybe a dozen guys that get to that 700k-950k mark imho. Hell I think with the right angle Floyd vs Jermain Taylor for a middleweight strap can be one of those that surpassed that 1 mill mark (if he didn't have this shooting case going on anyway). I think the September fight is the one that needs to be big though if that is to be his "last one". First off knowing boxers its unlikely to be his last one, but if it were to be his last he goes out big & if he's not done it makes him more valuable to re-sign for another fight or two.Ricky_ wrote:If Floyd continues to duck Pacquiao then it doesn't leave Floyd with much. Not alot of people are sold on Brook even though he's the other title holder, and Khan is a much, much bigger draw.
I don't see any other fighter Floyd can face now other than Khan or Pacquiao.
ReggieDiggs wrote: If winning three belts in three divisions as a 23 year old isn't impressive to you idk what to tell you. That alone puts him into a small category of professional boxers. You can certainly diss Adrien for many reasons & you can argue the belts are watered down, but you can't argue with results in particular at such a young age or that he's still doing sh!t that people aren't doing even when its watered down.
At the Floyd level of the game is what I mean. The majority of people that come out or get interested in boxing when Floyd is fighting don't go down to level 3 guys. Obviously Marcos isn't a nobody to boxing fans, but the casual fans got no f#cking clue who he is until All Access starts being televised.Ricky_ wrote: Marcos Maidana had headlined the MGM against Khan, he also won alot of fans putting a beat down on Broner. To say he was a nobody is ridiculous, in terms of boxing stardom, you have level #1 of Mayweather, Pacquiao, Cotto & Canelo. Level 2 is Khan, Marquez, Klitchko, etc... Broner and Maidana are arguably level 2, level 3 at worst.
Than why aren't more guys doing it if its not a big deal? I agree its not the 80's & its not the task it once was. No debating that. That don't mean its suddenly not impressive at all though.IKSRTFO wrote: Winning 3 belts in three divisions in 2014 is not impressive at all considering he NEVER beat the MAN to win none of those titles.
Broner being a 3 weight champ is just as unimpressive as Robert Guerrero being considered a "multi weight champ" It's not like the 80s.
ReggieDiggs wrote:Than why aren't more guys doing it if its not a big deal? I agree its not the 80's & its not the task it once was. No debating that. That don't mean its suddenly not impressive at all though.IKSRTFO wrote: Winning 3 belts in three divisions in 2014 is not impressive at all considering he NEVER beat the MAN to win none of those titles.
Broner being a 3 weight champ is just as unimpressive as Robert Guerrero being considered a "multi weight champ" It's not like the 80s.
I can agree with this. In particular the part where Adrien's persona plays into how his accomplishments are looked at. Obviously Adrien's road to 3 divisional belts vs Floyd's, Manny's or Oscar's or the numerous great fighters who've done it puts it into a more critical area, but still the task in & of itself is what is impressive despite the watered down title situation & Adrien's lesser obstacles to completing that task. Not many guys in this sport can do what Adrien has done like it or not, like him or not.crusader wrote:I think more guys capable of it aren't doing it because they aren't getting the opportunities to do so and most aren't jumping divisions so much. What Broner accomplished by the time he was 23 was fairly impressive in my view and I think people's dislike of his personality leads him to be generally underrated now, but I don't think a title being on the line in a bout makes a win much more impressive than it would be otherwise, so rather than judging a fighter by what he's won people should judge him by who he's fought and how he performed. When you do that with Broner and see that his title winning efforts included a victory over a mediocre fighter like Vicente Martin Rodriguez and close win over Paulie, someone I thought Broner seemed bigger than despite moving up a division, the titles in three weight divisions seems less impressive. W