Danny Green vs Dave Sands
Posted: 03 Jan 2015, 03:20
What are your thoughts on this Dream Match-up?...
What are your thoughts?ozboxfan wrote:What are your thoughts on this Dream Match-up?...
You are completely classless aren't youDA GOOSE wrote:![]()
Middleweight,deceased. Phil Austin would sanction it for a IBO Cruiserweight title I suppose.
A bit of respect for one of Australia's greatest ever fighters wouldn't go astray. But a casual fan like you wouldn't know who Dave Sands was.DA GOOSE wrote:![]()
Middleweight,deceased. Phil Austin would sanction it for a IBO Cruiserweight title I suppose.
Mentioning Dave Sands in the same sentence as Danny Green(Who fights weak opposition drug addicts,retired due to medical problems,hopeless fighters forced to drain weight for a bogus title etc.)is more disrespectful. Unlike you and pureist I actually watch boxing live Like a Boss I know you read Bombers assessment of Flores puts you and the rest of the Perth fanboys in your place didn't hebash for cash wrote:A bit of respect for one of Australia's greatest ever fighters wouldn't go astray. But a casual fan like you wouldn't know who Dave Sands was.DA GOOSE wrote:![]()
Middleweight,deceased. Phil Austin would sanction it for a IBO Cruiserweight title I suppose.
Hello still not watching significant world fights and being a boxing trainer. Seen Alvarez vs Lara yet? Brook vs Porter? Hopkins vs Kovalev?Pureist wrote:If they were the same weight you would have to put your money on sands for sure, as for Da Morons comments, that's exactly what I'd expect out of a spectator that regurgitates boxing writers comments, if it hasn't been written about by someone then he has NO idea
Rattled da moron, I'm not a couch potato casual like yourself, you can read all you want about boxing but at the end of the day have you ever seen a coach hired in afl of rugby that hasn't played the game, NO, there is a reason for that, there is a lot more to a sport than meets the eye, you need to play and experience to really know, and you just don't cut it, it may make you feel like a man on the surface but deep down you KNOW your really only a gimp want to be, if a poster asks a question such as sands v green, good luck to him, to say it's disrespectful, no, your first post was what I'd call disrepectfulDA GOOSE wrote:Hello still not watching significant world fights and being a boxing trainer. Seen Alvarez vs Lara yet? Brook vs Porter? Hopkins vs Kovalev?Pureist wrote:If they were the same weight you would have to put your money on sands for sure, as for Da Morons comments, that's exactly what I'd expect out of a spectator that regurgitates boxing writers comments, if it hasn't been written about by someone then he has NO idea
Now wouldn't that have been a great fight.....Sweet P wrote:A light Heavy vs a Small Middleweight. Green would be to big. If they were the same size. Sands wins it.
A better comparison would be Choc vs Sands. Both skilled fighter's. Both have speed power and good footwork.
Pureist wrote:Rattled da moron, I'm not a couch potato casual like yourself, you can read all you want about boxing but at the end of the day have you ever seen a coach hired in afl of rugby that hasn't played the game, NO, there is a reason for that, there is a lot more to a sport than meets the eye, you need to play and experience to really know, and you just don't cut it, it may make you feel like a man on the surface but deep down you KNOW your really only a gimp want to be, if a poster asks a question such as sands v green, good luck to him, to say it's disrespectful, no, your first post was what I'd call disrepectfulDA GOOSE wrote:Hello still not watching significant world fights and being a boxing trainer. Seen Alvarez vs Lara yet? Brook vs Porter? Hopkins vs Kovalev?Pureist wrote:If they were the same weight you would have to put your money on sands for sure, as for Da Morons comments, that's exactly what I'd expect out of a spectator that regurgitates boxing writers comments, if it hasn't been written about by someone then he has NO idea
The first question is clearly "What are your thoughts of this dream match-up?". Then gosh, if someone gives a thought that doesn't go along with the general direction of the thread... Watch out!Pureist wrote:If you can't read then you should learn to, read what we are writing and you will realize your right off the mark, Da Moron is a photocopier, reads and rewrites extracts of writers articles, I don't think anyone yet has said green was anywhere near the class of sands, Da Moron is a disrespectful knob on top of that
How long you planning on prowling around here nuffer? Til you get a job?Lairdy wrote:The first question is clearly "What are your thoughts of this dream match-up?". Then gosh, if someone gives a thought that doesn't go along with the general direction of the thread... Watch out!Pureist wrote:If you can't read then you should learn to, read what we are writing and you will realize your right off the mark, Da Moron is a photocopier, reads and rewrites extracts of writers articles, I don't think anyone yet has said green was anywhere near the class of sands, Da Moron is a disrespectful knob on top of that
I can only judge on some of the poo that i read on here. Unfortunately, there are a lot of "one eyed" people on here that can't accept another persons OPINION!
Wherever you're at man! I will be willing to educate you on the said subject!...bash for cash wrote:How long you planning on prowling around here nuffer? Til you get a job?Lairdy wrote:The first question is clearly "What are your thoughts of this dream match-up?". Then gosh, if someone gives a thought that doesn't go along with the general direction of the thread... Watch out!Pureist wrote:If you can't read then you should learn to, read what we are writing and you will realize your right off the mark, Da Moron is a photocopier, reads and rewrites extracts of writers articles, I don't think anyone yet has said green was anywhere near the class of sands, Da Moron is a disrespectful knob on top of that
I can only judge on some of the poo that i read on here. Unfortunately, there are a lot of "one eyed" people on here that can't accept another persons OPINION!
No use arguing with this guy the TS said what do you think of this dream match up.?Lairdy wrote:The first question is clearly "What are your thoughts of this dream match-up?". Then gosh, if someone gives a thought that doesn't go along with the general direction of the thread... Watch out!Pureist wrote:If you can't read then you should learn to, read what we are writing and you will realize your right off the mark, Da Moron is a photocopier, reads and rewrites extracts of writers articles, I don't think anyone yet has said green was anywhere near the class of sands, Da Moron is a disrespectful knob on top of that
I can only judge on some of the poo that i read on here. Unfortunately, there are a lot of "one eyed" people on here that can't accept another persons OPINION!
Not unless unemployment benefits just took on a logrithmic increaseLairdy wrote:
And p.s - I'm probably on better money than you are...
Exactly.DA GOOSE wrote:No use arguing with this guy the TS said what do you think of this dream match up.?Lairdy wrote:The first question is clearly "What are your thoughts of this dream match-up?". Then gosh, if someone gives a thought that doesn't go along with the general direction of the thread... Watch out!Pureist wrote:If you can't read then you should learn to, read what we are writing and you will realize your right off the mark, Da Moron is a photocopier, reads and rewrites extracts of writers articles, I don't think anyone yet has said green was anywhere near the class of sands, Da Moron is a disrespectful knob on top of that
I can only judge on some of the poo that i read on here. Unfortunately, there are a lot of "one eyed" people on here that can't accept another persons OPINION!So obviously he thinks Green is near the class of Sands. Pureist was on another forum and got laughed off it commenting on fights he hadn't seen. I see you have been accused of being someone else already. Amazing.