BJS Vs. Andy Lee purse bids
Posted: 29 Jan 2015, 05:34
Did they take place and who won?
I wonder how much more money a fight with Quillen on NBC terrestrial TV will generate though? Surely a domestic fight with BJS on a £12 subscription channel which would generate the channel more (albeit potential short term) subscribers!Boxerbeetle wrote:All the rumours have been Lee will vacate for a big money fight in the US rather than fight BJS, no idea if true though.
Tomorrow then :)Chris W 1982 wrote:Got delayed for 72 hours guys.
allegedly won a purse bid, but not for Saunders to face Lee! WTF is going on?ChieftanDublin wrote:Any updates on the purse bid? Did it happen at all or is Lee going to give up the belt and fight Quililn?
Just covering all the bases, winning that purse bid keeps him in control of the European title for Saunders and the date the fight is on, he won't be forced to vacate this way, he's done similar with Blackwell for the British title. Doesn't mean the Lee fight is off, same site jumped the gun with Ormond-Flanagan claiming it wouldn't be rescheduled because Frank won the purse bids for Flanagan-Cardle.chad wrote:allegedly won a purse bid, but not for Saunders to face Lee! WTF is going on?ChieftanDublin wrote:Any updates on the purse bid? Did it happen at all or is Lee going to give up the belt and fight Quililn?
http://www.irish-boxing.com/warren-win- ... llin-back/
I thought Saunders facing Lee next was a done deal. Saunders is at risk of side-stepping himself out of the picture.
The_Don1 wrote:Hopefully Lee detonates on Blow Job Saunders like he did with Korobov, anyone seen that video of Saunders telling his kid to punch a HMV employee in the balls and the kid went and did it? Saunders is an absolute c*nt of a man
perhaps plan B is for Saunders to face the winner of Eubank's pretend WBA championship fight. If that guy (forgotten his name) beats Eubank then he's viable for Saunders, if Eubank wins, the return is a natural, and a bigger fight than last time. Holding that crappy pretend WBA belt puts you in the frame for the moment the proper WBA champ makes a career move that vacates the WBA title. Fwank is particularly adept at steering his fighters to opportunities like that.ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
It also makes you mandatory for the super champ (Golovkin), however, not only is it the regular WBA championship, but the interim regular WBA championshipJimJim2009 wrote:perhaps plan B is for Saunders to face the winner of Eubank's pretend WBA championship fight. If that guy (forgotten his name) beats Eubank then he's viable for Saunders, if Eubank wins, the return is a natural, and a bigger fight than last time. Holding that crappy pretend WBA belt puts you in the frame for the moment the proper WBA champ makes a career move that vacates the WBA title. Fwank is particularly adept at steering his fighters to opportunities like that.ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
You mean Haymon giving Bnation the NBC fights for a cut price as well as giving BJS a bit on the side?gobbles wrote:ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
Haymon/allegedly deal? That might swing it
Saunders will still be mandatory and then Quillin will have to defend against him or vacate like he did against Korobov!ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
As long as allegedly get the NBC fights Im a happy bunny!digzee wrote:You mean Haymon giving Bnation the NBC fights for a cut price as well as giving BJS a bit on the side?gobbles wrote:ChieftanDublin wrote:Apparently its now a done deal for Lee to fight Peter Quillin, and BJS to get step aside money. Seems quite bizarre that allegedly wouldn't insist on Lee defending against Saunders. I'm a fan of Andy Lee, but don't see him beating Quillin, and then Saunders is left out in the cold. Quillin will have the title again and he wont defend it against Saunders. Maybe I'm missing something here????
Haymon/allegedly deal? That might swing it