Page 1 of 1

Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 17:35
by 1 nut
He is announcing his fight at tonight's superbowl . The is no reason to announce a fight at the biggest sporting calendar event in th U.S ! He would look stupid if it wasn't .
Finally we have it

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 17:42
by Boxerbeetle
I'm booking my flight right now on the strength of this concrete evidence.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 17:42
by Tuan_Jim
1 nut hath spake.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 17:43
by 1 nut
Good idea in a few hours they will be double or treble the price

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 17:43
by 1 nut
What's hath spake mean ?

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 18:04
by Parson Cross
Wow didn't see that coming. Thanks for the heads up.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 01 Feb 2015, 21:51
by seanilius
YEAH? WHO CARES!? WAKE ME UP WHEN TOMMY COYLE VS LUKE CAMPBELL IS MADE!

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 00:14
by Tarkus
That American thing did happen. Where is announcement?

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 01:47
by Taansend
They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?

Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 03:50
by mickey1975
Taansend wrote:They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?

Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
It should be. Campbell-Coyle will be more exciting.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 08:42
by seanilius
Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 09:27
by mickey1975
seanilius wrote:Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.
No, he'll leave that on Sky as a treat for us, never forgetting to remind us. The people of Hull will make up for it with a 20,000+ live gate(I'm not joking).

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 15:45
by Parson Cross
1 nut suddenly seems appropriate.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 15:51
by Monte Fisto
And that may have just burst

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 20:40
by seanilius
:DDD
Tuan_Jim wrote:1 nut hath spake.

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 05:30
by 1 nut
I meant it will be announced this week , sorry for the delay ha ha ha ha ha

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 08:06
by Parson Cross
and if it's not ?

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Posted: 04 Feb 2015, 16:17
by Monte Fisto
He will have minus 1 nut, and change his name to negative nut. It's so sad that this fight can't be made. So sad

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Posted: 04 Feb 2015, 17:21
by LivingWithDixon
1 nut wrote:What's hath spake mean ?
Ask Nietzsche