Page 1 of 1
Enzo's next fight, why bother
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 19:35
by Lefthookhappy19
Enzo Macarinelli's next fight is pathetic, even by Sports Networks standards. He's fighting Carlos Cruzat, a 35 year old former middleweight who didn't even fight in 2003. The guy has been dropped and stopped on numerous times in his career. He's also 5'9 while Enzo's 6'4. This fight is an absolute embarressment. It has to be one of the most pathetic fights ive ever seen made anywhere. It makes no sense at all. Its almost guaranteed to end in the first or second round. What the fornicate is going on?
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 19:39
by Matchfixer
Is he the original opponent?
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 20:10
by Lefthookhappy19
I assume he is, its been scheduled for a while now.
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 20:54
by buzz
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 22:16
by Neri
Sports Network seem to be famous more for their mismatches than anything else lately
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 04:40
by Twinkle Toes
SN are allowed to get away with it, because the bbboc let them.
Any promoter will make these sort of matches if they can get away with it, shame on the board I say.
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 06:48
by Goz
Twinkle Toes wrote:SN are allowed to get away with it, because the bbboc let them.
Mismatches have always happened in boxing, nothing new really. SN are allowed to get away with but it's SKY you should vent your spleen at, not the BBBC.
This is a shocking matchup, as the original poster said, why bother? What is the point in this 'fight'?
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 07:47
by Twinkle Toes
Nah, I don't fully agree Goz. The bboc are there to veto fighters, and matches. They are supposed to be here for the integrity of boxing as a sport.
They fail imo.
SKY are also at fault, and I have posted numerous times saying just that, but my point is the bbboc also have a lot to answer for.
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 08:00
by Goz
Twinkle Toes wrote:Nah, I don't fully agree Goz. The bboc are there to veto fighters, and matches. They are supposed to be here for the integrity of boxing as a sport.
They fail imo.
SKY are also at fault, and I have posted numerous times saying just that, but my point is the bbboc also have a lot to answer for.
Fair enough.
Or hairy muff as we say in work.
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 08:02
by KOJOE90
Enzo will learn nothing in this fight, it looks a poor match-up.
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 08:04
by Twinkle Toes
Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 08:05
by Goz
Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Well Mr Calzaghe his compatriot has been getting plenty I guess.....
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 11:08
by richter-scale
Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 11:17
by REAL_DEAL
richter-scale wrote:Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit
i will tell him you said that
Posted: 19 Jun 2004, 11:23
by richter-scale
REAL_DEAL wrote:richter-scale wrote:Twinkle Toes wrote:Hairy muff could well be Enzo's next defence Goz
Let's just hope he stays out of Mark Hobson's way, for his benifit
i will tell him you said that
He can be my first defence of the boxrec title when i'v ended deals (career)!!!
