Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 12:54
So I noticed that Chudinov - Sturm fight is for the WBA Regular Champion Belt. Does that mean that Froch finally got stripped of his last belt, and we can finally forget about him? 
BoxRec
Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Page 1 of 1
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 13:05
So, we will get a soft champion which Ward could later beat easily.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 13:15
If Chudinov beats Sturm, he automatically becomes a legitimate name in the SMW division.ikorolev wrote:So, we will get a soft champion which Ward could later beat easily.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 13:17
A legitimate name but too soft for Ward or even Dirrell brothers.klitoris wrote:If Chudinov beats Sturm, he automatically becomes a legitimate name in the SMW division.ikorolev wrote:So, we will get a soft champion which Ward could later beat easily.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 14:14
I see your problem.fergusg wrote:I’m confused:
• On the 28th February, the WBA ordered a mandatory fight between Andre Ward and Carl Froch
• According to the WBA’s own statement, when the 30-day deadline for both parties to reach an agreement expires, which happened on the 30th March, the Froch-Ward contest will be opened to purse bids
• According to the WBA’s own website, they still consider Carl Froch as their WBA “regular” world champion and Fedor Chudinov is their “interim” titleholder
• Carl Froch has not announced that he’s vacated his WBA belt
• The WBA has not opened the Ward-Froch bout to purse bids
• According to the media, Team Ward and Team Froch are still negotiating the date, venue and purses for the fight
• BoxRec and Vladimir Hrunov (the promoter) both claim that winner of the Chudinov-Sturm fight will claim ownership of the vacant “regular” WBA title
If Chudinov & Sturm are really fighting for the vacant “regular” WBA 168lb title, how did Froch lose his belt?:??
You are trying to understand the behavior of the WBA. You should give up on that, it will be better for your sanity.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 14:17
Froch probably refused to go to purse bids because the fight with Ward wouldn't get him the money he wants. Plus on top of that he'd probably lose like he lost the first time. Just because Froch hasn't announced he vacated, doesn't mean he hasn't.fergusg wrote:I’m confused:
• On the 28th February, the WBA ordered a mandatory fight between Andre Ward and Carl Froch
• According to the WBA’s own statement, when the 30-day deadline for both parties to reach an agreement expires, which happened on the 30th March, the Froch-Ward contest will be opened to purse bids
• According to the WBA’s own website, they still consider Carl Froch as their WBA “regular” world champion and Fedor Chudinov is their “interim” titleholder
• Carl Froch has not announced that he’s vacated his WBA belt
• The WBA has not opened the Ward-Froch bout to purse bids
• According to the media, Team Ward and Team Froch are still negotiating the date, venue and purses for the fight
• BoxRec and Vladimir Hrunov (the promoter) both claim that winner of the Chudinov-Sturm fight will claim ownership of the vacant “regular” WBA title
• Based on the WBA’s own statement, the deadline date for the Froch-Ward bout to take place is the 28th June, which is 120 days after the WBA initially ordered the fight. Meanwhile, Fedor Chudinov & Felix Sturm are apparently fighting each other to capture this “vacant” title on the 9th May, which is 50 days before the specified deadline
If Chudinov & Sturm are really fighting for the vacant “regular” WBA 168lb title, how did Froch lose his belt?
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 14:18
Does this really matter to you guys as fans? That's disappointing. The WBA 'regular' world title is total BS and we should just ignore it, at least until the WBA starts calling it something other than a world title. No one should be any more concerned with this belt than they are with the WBC Silver title, as they are essentially the same thing, except even the WBC showed a shred of pride/dignity in naming their 2nd-place trinket.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 14:35
Well the WBA does have history of catering to Felix Sturm.
They stripped Taylor of his WBA middleweight belt for no reason other than giving Felix a chance to fight for it.
All these years later and a division higher the same thing appears to be happening to Froch.
They stripped Taylor of his WBA middleweight belt for no reason other than giving Felix a chance to fight for it.
All these years later and a division higher the same thing appears to be happening to Froch.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 14:47
Few people care if Carl has a corrupt abc belt. Carl has earned people not caring if he has a corrupt abc belt.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 19:22
WBA is the most corrupt of all ABC bodies. Shumenov was their super champion without fighting for a long time and certainly without fighting anybody decent. Now Braehmer holds the regular title without having to fight the super champion or anybody decent at all. Jacobs is not ordered to fight Golovkin or Eubank (or previously Chudinov). Chudinov brothers themselves got their belts in front of more deserving fighters ...
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 20:02
Strum's people must have purchased the lifetime abc belt corruption package back in the day. Hell of a bargain.Perseus wrote:Well the WBA does have history of catering to Felix Sturm.
Re: Froch's WBA Regular stripped?
Posted: 03 Apr 2015, 21:27
... and then he talked fellow Germans, Braehmer, Stieglitz and Abraham, into buying such packages too.ReggieDiggs wrote:Strum's people must have purchased the lifetime abc belt corruption package back in the day. Hell of a bargain.Perseus wrote:Well the WBA does have history of catering to Felix Sturm.