BoxRec

Miguel Cotto vs Sugar Shane Mosley.

?

Well i think a past prime mosley beat a prime cotto, so thats my opinion.

It's debatable whether Cotto won their fight, which I believe happened in Cotto's prime and after Mosley's.

Mosley for me, either by a close-but-clear decision or stoppage.

jezzamundo wrote:It's debatable whether Cotto won their fight, which I believe happened in Cotto's prime and after Mosley's.

Mosley for me, either by a close-but-clear decision or stoppage.

All this idiot Ricky did was made this post because he was under the impression that Shane was passed it when he fought Cotto, which everyone's post here proves thus far that he wasn't and many (including myself) believe that Shane won that fight.

KBB wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:It's debatable whether Cotto won their fight, which I believe happened in Cotto's prime and after Mosley's.

Mosley for me, either by a close-but-clear decision or stoppage.

All this idiot Ricky did was made this post because he was under the impression that Shane was passed it when he fought Cotto, which everyone's post here proves thus far that he wasn't and many (including myself) believe that Shane won that fight.

Currently 10-1 there Brut, and something tells me you're the "1".

A prime Mosley would have knocked Cotto out, not lose a close Dec.

Mosley would have him.

Ricky_ wrote:

KBB wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:It's debatable whether Cotto won their fight, which I believe happened in Cotto's prime and after Mosley's.

Mosley for me, either by a close-but-clear decision or stoppage.

All this idiot Ricky did was made this post because he was under the impression that Shane was passed it when he fought Cotto, which everyone's post here proves thus far that he wasn't and many (including myself) believe that Shane won that fight.

Currently 10-1 there Brut, and something tells me you're the "1".

A prime Mosley would have knocked Cotto out, not lose a close Dec.

You just asked about their primes but read the responses here, not one person would say that Shane was past it when he fought Cotto!! If so, then please show me??

prime mosley of the odh fight would have beat so many great opponents. i think floyd who struggled against the fast strong judah, would have had a nightmare against a stronger and even faster prime mosley....

I'd go with Mosley as well and thought Mosley was in top form for the Cotto fight. I would pick the Mosley that fought DLH to beat Cotto (the Mosley that was on the juice), but not by a huge margin.

No way Mosley beat Cotto in their fight. Close but clear decision for Miguel. The judges got it right.
Prime for prime, Mosley takes it. Though it's not a foregone conclusion, as Shane's best was at lightweight

Mosley peaked in the 2000-2001 ballpark, and was most definitely past his prime when he tangled with Cotto. The Mosley who controversially beat prime DLH and flattened Antonio Diaz would have beaten Cotto decisively indeed.

Ricky_ wrote: Currently 10-1 there Brut, and something tells me you're the "1".

A prime Mosley would have knocked Cotto out, not lose a close Dec.

Hey d*ckbreath, what's the score now?? Something tells me you've abandoned your own thread after being proved to be wrong just as you are about everything else.

In fact you've never been right about anything and still won't be come May 2nd.

KBB wrote:

Ricky_ wrote: Currently 10-1 there Brut, and something tells me you're the "1".

A prime Mosley would have knocked Cotto out, not lose a close Dec.

Hey d*ckbreath, what's the score now?? Something tells me you've abandoned your own thread after being proved to be wrong just as you are about everything else.

In fact you've never been right about anything and still won't be come May 2nd.

About a 5-1 ratio... Still in favor of Mosley. And I guess he can be "proved wrong" by a massive pool of 28 participants. DD

Put me down for Shane ... just about it's close.

Cotto is one of my favorite fighters ever. It was really hard not voting for him here, Sugar Shane takes him!

Lackeos wrote:Mosley peaked in the 2000-2001 ballpark, and was most definitely past his prime when he tangled with Cotto. The Mosley who controversially beat prime DLH and flattened Antonio Diaz would have beaten Cotto decisively indeed.

Yup. Mosley knocks Cotto out.

Ricky_ wrote:

Lackeos wrote:Mosley peaked in the 2000-2001 ballpark, and was most definitely past his prime when he tangled with Cotto. The Mosley who controversially beat prime DLH and flattened Antonio Diaz would have beaten Cotto decisively indeed.

Yup. Mosley knocks Cotto out.

Is this the dumb ass Ricky eating crow? Where are all your jeers and sneers now stupid? The poll you added is overwhelmingly in favor of Shane and you may as well admit that you thought Cotto was going to be ahead but again, you've always been wrong all your life, never right about anything and so far, nothings changed.

Congrats, you're still a dumb asshole.

Your new name should be KBBee because you just buzz around like an annoying bee. Bzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzz.

The poll and opinions are exactly as expected. Cotto beat a past-it Mosely. A prine Sugar would brutalise Miguel.

Ricky_ wrote:Your new name should be KBBee because you just buzz around like an annoying bee. Bzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzz.

The poll and opinions are exactly as expected. Cotto beat a past-it Mosely. A prine Sugar would brutalise Miguel.

Mosley was not past it, your poll doesn't reflect a "past it" Shane, you only addressed their primes, why you can't wake up and smell the sh*t you're shoveling? (rhetorical)

Shane wasn't past his prime when he and Cotto fought, for someone to be past it they have to look like Oscar did vs Pacquiao>>>that's past it.

He had 3 wins before the fight with Cotto and many people thought he beat Miguel in that very close fight that could've went either way depending on who you ask. Shane blew out Vargas and beat a much younger and primed Collazo (a guy people here still gave miles of credit to Amir for beating) and you say he was "past it".

Not to mention what he went on to do after that (KOing both Mayorga and Margarito) and the competitive rematch he has with Winky before his Vargas fights.

If that is an indication of someone being "past it" then more fighters should be washed up then maybe they'd do better in fights.

You are the annoying one here with your BS/Garbage posts fantasizing and romanticizing something that just isn't true.

KBB wrote:

Ricky_ wrote:Your new name should be KBBee because you just buzz around like an annoying bee. Bzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzz.

The poll and opinions are exactly as expected. Cotto beat a past-it Mosely. A prine Sugar would brutalise Miguel.

Mosley was not past it, your poll doesn't reflect a "past it" Shane, you only addressed their primes, why you can't wake up and smell the sh*t you're shoveling? (rhetorical)

Shane wasn't past his prime when he and Cotto fought, for someone to be past it they have to look like Oscar did vs Pacquiao>>>that's past it.

He had 3 wins before the fight with Cotto and many people thought he beat Miguel in that very close fight that could've went either way depending on who you ask. Shane blew out Vargas and beat a much younger and primed Collazo (a guy people here still gave miles of credit to Amir for beating) and you say he was "past it".

Not to mention what he went on to do after that (KOing both Mayorga and Margarito) and the competitive rematch he has with Winky before his Vargas fights.

If that is an indication of someone being "past it" then more fighters should be washed up then maybe they'd do better in fights.

You are the annoying one here with your BS/Garbage posts fantasizing and romanticizing something that just isn't true.

Ricky_ wrote:

This guy who spit the truth to the likes of which you have nothing of solid proof to refute it with so you resort to posting dumb ass pictures that reflect your level of intellect.

Have a nice day Ricky, I love debating with you dawg.