Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas
Posted: 01 May 2015, 14:25
A win against Hopkins, even at this stage, would significantly improve Froch's resume. It would arguably be his best win.ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.
There was no one better than Smith that they tried to get? Stieglitz, Sturm etc?ALI wrote:Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Horse wrote:A win against Hopkins, even at this stage, would significantly improve Froch's resume. It would arguably be his best win.ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.There was no one better than Smith that they tried to get? Stieglitz, Sturm etc?ALI wrote:Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Also why is Ward vs Smith at a catchweight of 172 lbs? That seems strange.
Hopkins was a unified champion less than 6 months ago and he is still a top 3 ranked fighter at light heavyweight.Rexob wrote:10 years ago not now?
It's a bit like saying Khans best win was over Barrera?
Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
expe wrote:Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
That will likely be Froch's attitude, but him fighting there depends on the opponent and Hopkins hasn't fought in Las Vegas for a long time, if the Kovalev fight wasn't there, I don't think a fight against Froch would be either.Rexob wrote:expe wrote:Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
Vegas or nothing I would have thought?
leejonesjnr wrote:I'm just not a Froch fan but if what he wants is a name opponent that he has a good chance of beating in Vegas, what more can he ask for?
Goldenboy would have no problems putting together a show on the strip and Hopkins seems happy to go for it.
I suspect that Froch will retire if he doesn't get a beatable name in LV.
Ward who has fought once in almost 2 years saying Froch had disappeared? And then saying Smith was willing to travel but he wouldn't fight in Nottingham and he could fill Wembley yet he can't get a mainstream broadcaster in the US. He seems a bit confused.ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.
Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Ward seems a little delusional, he seems to confuse talent with selling ability. I must admit, I have some sympathy for him as he is in one of the only sports in the world where being the best in the world doesn't necessarily mean you get paid the most.samwbr wrote:Ward who has fought once in almost 2 years saying Froch had disappeared? And then saying Smith was willing to travel but he wouldn't fight in Nottingham and he could fill Wembley yet he can't get a mainstream broadcaster in the US. He seems a bit confused.ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.
Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.