BoxRec

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

Like a Boss wrote:

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

Here's a diversion for you then:

Floyd Mayweather has said in an interview with Showtime that at the moment he's not interested in a rematch with Manny Pacquiao ''because he's a sore loser and he's a coward.''

Now Pacquiao was the loser on the night. But "coward"?

How can you call a guy you just fought, who chased you all over the ring for 12 rounds trying to knock your head off, a coward?

tiny_acres wrote:

Like a Boss wrote:

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

Here's a diversion for you then:

Floyd Mayweather has said in an interview with Showtime that at the moment he's not interested in a rematch with Manny Pacquiao ''because he's a sore loser and he's a coward.''

Now Pacquiao was the loser on the night. But "coward"?

How can you call a guy you just fought, who chased you all over the ring for 12 rounds trying to knock your head off, a coward?

I think he was more referring to the post fight excuses.
And I think coward is the wrong word to use.
But I still feel he us just trying to hype a rematch.The only ones who
will suffer are the true boxing fans because we have all had enough of it.

Like a Boss wrote:

tiny_acres wrote:

Like a Boss wrote:
Here's a diversion for you then:

Floyd Mayweather has said in an interview with Showtime that at the moment he's not interested in a rematch with Manny Pacquiao ''because he's a sore loser and he's a coward.''

Now Pacquiao was the loser on the night. But "coward"?

How can you call a guy you just fought, who chased you all over the ring for 12 rounds trying to knock your head off, a coward?

I think he was more referring to the post fight excuses.
And I think coward is the wrong word to use.
But I still feel he us just trying to hype a rematch.The only ones who
will suffer are the true boxing fans because we have all had enough of it.

Really hard to see even the possibility of a rematch when, according to Pacquiao's doctor, he will have his shoulder operated on and it will keep him out of the ring for 9 to 12 months.

Chepppaaa wrote:i dont understand what everybody is talking about floyd schooling manny.

winning 11-12 out of 12 is schooling to me.

what i saw, was manny winning rounds 3,4, 9 and 12. a draw round at 2 were both were landing o clear shots and nobody was doing shid expect running and punching air and clinching. so considering a ref who doesnt like hugging or excessive holding takes apoint away from floyd, that i would have been a draw. i dont know what everybody here is talking about.

7 rounds floyd
4 rounds manny
1 round draw

so if this is schooling against a one armed boxer than schooling doesnt mean much. i mean floyd won in a boring fashion. but one armed manny isnt prime manny, prime trinidad, prime leonard or prime hearns. tbe my ass. one armed manny wouldnt have lasted 8 rounds against an peak shape hearns or trinidad.

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

Bobbyptsd wrote:

tiny_acres wrote:Please no more on the winner or loser.
We can talk possible rematch.
We can talk how much they made
We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

but I really can not handle who won anymore.

Tell me who you think won! I want a dissertation about every round!

tiny_acres wrote: We can talk a bout there ugly assed mothers.

Badhusker wrote:After re-watching the fight the same guy won. How much he won by is a non-ending debate, and pointless now.

I paid special attention to Pacquiao to see if there was any indication of injury, even the slightest wince of pain, or comment about it in between rounds. Guess what? Nothing. Why didn't he say something right after the fight to Kellerman? I would have called him worse if I were Floyd. Nothing but pathetic sour grape excuses, with the sole intent on tarnishing Floyd's victory and providing excuses to the public of why he lost. I hope he gets sued big time for opening his stupid mouth about that crap.

One armed boxer?