Page 1 of 2

Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 02:59
by Cent0089
vs Proksa 685 000
vs Rosado 813 000
vs Macklin 1 100 000
vs Stevens 1 410 000
vs Rubio 1 300 000

That is really good for someone who was unknown in USA before year 2012. Comparing to Canelo-Kirkland 2.2 milion viewership, GGG-Canelo is definitely PPV fight IMO :box:

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 03:06
by Ilya Muromets
The books have him a 100 to 1 favorite in his upcoming fight.

:)

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 12:20
by SenorPipino
I predict he won't look any better than a 10-1 choice.

Leo Santa Cruz was also a 100-1 favorite in his Mayweather-Pacquiao undercard fight. With those odds, he should have been expected to destroy his opponent , Jose Cayetano in under 2 rounds.

Despite the one-sided nature of the bout, Cayetano put on a rather spirited effort, and certainly looked nothing like an "out" underdog.

Let's see if Golovkin can put on a performance worthy of a 100-1 favorite.
Monroe Jr. is no chump despite his inexperience at the elite level, and should provide an interesting contrast to the one-dimensional style that the champion usually encounters.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 12:25
by tiny_acres
Cent0089 wrote:vs Proksa 685 000
vs Rosado 813 000
vs Macklin 1 100 000
vs Stevens 1 410 000
vs Rubio 1 300 000

That is really good for someone who was unknown in USA before year 2012. Comparing to Canelo-Kirkland 2.2 milion viewership, GGG-Canelo is definitely PPV fight IMO :box:
Can we compare apples to apples and not go crazy with the 2.2 million views.
Canelo had the Mayweather-Pacquiao replay as the lead in.
I don't think the numbers would of been close to 2.2 million with out the replay.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 12:27
by KBB
Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 13:27
by Ilya Muromets
KBB wrote:Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.

GGG is a middleweight.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 14:38
by ikorolev
KBB wrote:Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.
Lebedev, Huck, Wilder and Klitchko should be considered too.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:00
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:
KBB wrote:Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.
Lebedev, Huck, Wilder and Klitchko should be considered too.

Why not, if you can suggest he drops 2 weight classes to fight Floyd then I'm certain that I can suggest he move up 3. Too bad you're all butthurt about it.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:01
by KBB
x2x wrote:GGG is a middleweight.
No, really?? :doh:

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:09
by ikorolev
KBB wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
KBB wrote:Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.
Lebedev, Huck, Wilder and Klitchko should be considered too.

Why not, if you can suggest he drops 2 weight classes to fight Floyd then I'm certain that I can suggest he move up 3. Too bad you're all butthurt about it.
HE suggests that he drops ONE weight class to fight your beloved Floyd, and I don't see an issue for him to move up ONE weight class for a good money fight.

If you have a problem with numbers 1,2 and 3, I am afraid even I can't help you.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:15
by Boxing Prospect
...so the people that hate GGG are Mayweather fans... right now shit makes sense...

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:32
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:HE suggests that he drops ONE weight class to fight your beloved Floyd, and I don't see an issue for him to move up ONE weight class for a good money fight.

If you have a problem with numbers 1,2 and 3, I am afraid even I can't help you.
By all means I should not even bother to address you after the Pacquiao Duck move you pulled in your other posts regarding your beloved GGG.

GGG is ducking Lara and Ward but he readily states he wants Floyd and you justify him by stating that money is the only thing that matters.

Quack Quack :zzz:

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:58
by ikorolev
You are even dumber than I thought. Why fights with Lara and Ward haven't happened was explained many times, but some people are just too dumb to understand.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 17:11
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:You are even dumber than I thought. Why fights with Lara and Ward haven't happened was explained many times, but some people are just too dumb to understand.
If Floyd and Manny can fight then any fighter can. Stop making excuses dumb ass.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 19:42
by ikorolev
KBB wrote:
ikorolev wrote:You are even dumber than I thought. Why fights with Lara and Ward haven't happened was explained many times, but some people are just too dumb to understand.
If Floyd and Manny can fight then any fighter can. Stop making excuses dumb ass.
And who will come up with millions of dollars ?

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 20:48
by Bobbyptsd
ikorolev wrote:
KBB wrote:Well he has the KOs on his record and HBO's Lampley scarfing down Tripleta's weenie any chance he get so I'm not surprised that he has those numbers.

Hopefully his numbers will continue to surge thus causing him to finally move out of the realm of facing journeymen or hasbeens into facing the top guys I want to see him fight like Ward, Kovalev, Beterbiev, Fonfara and the likes.
Lebedev, Huck, Wilder and Klitchko should be considered too.
I would like to add Valuev. He needs to come out of retirement and fight GGG. How are we going to know if he's any good if he won't fight the really bigger guys?

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 23:26
by KBB
Bobbyptsd wrote:I would like to add Valuev. He needs to come out of retirement and fight GGG. How are we going to know if he's any good if he won't fight the really bigger guys?
You've really got in for me, you follow me in every thread with something simpleminded and totally stupid to say in each one.

Now I can see that you are no more than a born Troll that developed d*ckheaded asshole tendencies. :doh:

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 23:28
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:And who will come up with millions of dollars ?
Maybe that Troll asswipe Bobbyptsd can, he seems to know how to find and troll me in every thread. It may be up his alley to sniff out and find money in the same fashion.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 23:36
by ikorolev
KBB wrote:
ikorolev wrote:And who will come up with millions of dollars ?
Maybe that Troll asswipe Bobbyptsd can, he seems to know how to find and troll me in every thread. It may be up his alley to sniff out and find money in the same fashion.
Why the F are you posting in every thread ? Give people a break and post only in Mayweather related threads.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 23:39
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:Why the F are you posting in every thread ? Give people a break and post only in Mayweather related threads.
Unlike you I was born into boxing and have been a fan since I was 5 years old. You are just a fan of GGG and know very little about this sport, as soon as he lose you will more than likely hang yourself or quit coming around here because you have no weenie to roast.

I suspect it will happen sooner rather than later and I cannot wait for you to disappear because you don't want me here telling the truth about your hero.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 13 May 2015, 23:56
by Ilya Muromets
Bobbyptsd wrote:I would like to add Valuev. He needs to come out of retirement and fight GGG. How are we going to know if he's any good if he won't fight the really bigger guys?

_________________


Nicolai Valuev, like Vitali, is now in politics. He's in the Russian parliament.

Image

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 14 May 2015, 00:05
by ikorolev
KBB wrote:
ikorolev wrote:Why the F are you posting in every thread ? Give people a break and post only in Mayweather related threads.
Unlike you I was born into boxing and have been a fan since I was 5 years old.
Ah, birth defect. That explains everything. I am sorry for laughing at your mental abilities.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 14 May 2015, 00:20
by Bobbyptsd
KBB wrote:
Bobbyptsd wrote:I would like to add Valuev. He needs to come out of retirement and fight GGG. How are we going to know if he's any good if he won't fight the really bigger guys?
You've really got in for me, you follow me in every thread with something simpleminded and totally stupid to say in each one.

Now I can see that you are no more than a born Troll that developed d*ckheaded asshole tendencies. :doh:
It's a forum for discussion, I sometimes respond to posts on said forum in the guise of, you know, discussion. Agreeing with people sometimes, disagreeing at others.

In short, no, of course I'm not trolling you, that's absurd. The forum isn't about you. I've disagreed with Ikorolev, to cite an example of someone who's in this thread, on many an occasion, agreed with him on others. I'm hardly trolling him either. I'm participating in a forum.

When you close your eyes at night, does the word stop existing? That's a rhetorical question.

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 14 May 2015, 00:39
by KBB
ikorolev wrote:Ah, birth defect. That explains everything. I am sorry for laughing at your mental abilities.
Which are far superior to yours so I'm laughing harder at you. :lol:

Re: Golovkin viewership

Posted: 14 May 2015, 00:50
by 5burowz
Everyone wants to see who is going to be the next good boy