Should Anthony Joshua go for the British title?
Posted: 25 May 2015, 03:56
I personally would like him to so that he may come up against Whyte, Chisora, Price maybe. Or in (hopefully) defeating Johnson has he risen above that level?
Nicely summarised and can't argue with it at allchad wrote:When Fury beat Johnson in 2012 it was a WBC heavyweight title eliminator. When Chisora beat Johnson last year it was a tune up fight to face Fury with the winner going on to face Klitschko. Johnson is very much the gatekeeper to the heavyweight division at the moment. If Joshua destroys him, he's pretty much bypassed domestic level and can look forward to the European and World stage.
I think that shows how Johnson's status has slowly diminished, he went from only having lost to Vitali, to a decent test for Fury, then a tune up for Chisora. At this point he isn't really a gatekeeper to world level anymore, just another vague name opponent, almost like a high end journeyman with the way he goes through fights without ever seeming to have any ambition of winning. I can't see him being a massive test for Joshua because he usually turns up with no ambition, even stopping him wouldn't be much of a statement considering that Chisora managed to drop him, the only way for Joshua to make people sit up and take notice with this fight is to get Johnson out of there in the first 6 rounds.chad wrote:When Fury beat Johnson in 2012 it was a WBC heavyweight title eliminator. When Chisora beat Johnson last year it was a tune up fight to face Fury with the winner going on to face Klitschko. Johnson is very much the gatekeeper to the heavyweight division at the moment. If Joshua destroys him, he's pretty much bypassed domestic level and can look forward to the European and World stage.
i disagree. Always go for the British title if you can. Specially the way he's blazing through some "bums". The more experience he has the better as there will come a day probably that he'll need it to call upon.kamicazze wrote:Nicely summarised and can't argue with it at allchad wrote:When Fury beat Johnson in 2012 it was a WBC heavyweight title eliminator. When Chisora beat Johnson last year it was a tune up fight to face Fury with the winner going on to face Klitschko. Johnson is very much the gatekeeper to the heavyweight division at the moment. If Joshua destroys him, he's pretty much bypassed domestic level and can look forward to the European and World stage.
Very much soexpe wrote:I think that shows how Johnson's status has slowly diminished, he went from only having lost to Vitali, to a decent test for Fury, then a tune up for Chisora. At this point he isn't really a gatekeeper to world level anymore, just another vague name opponent, almost like a high end journeyman with the way he goes through fights without ever seeming to have any ambition of winning. I can't see him being a massive test for Joshua because he usually turns up with no ambition, even stopping him wouldn't be much of a statement considering that Chisora managed to drop him, the only way for Joshua to make people sit up and take notice with this fight is to get Johnson out of there in the first 6 rounds.chad wrote:When Fury beat Johnson in 2012 it was a WBC heavyweight title eliminator. When Chisora beat Johnson last year it was a tune up fight to face Fury with the winner going on to face Klitschko. Johnson is very much the gatekeeper to the heavyweight division at the moment. If Joshua destroys him, he's pretty much bypassed domestic level and can look forward to the European and World stage.
Johnson didn't lose by a landslide to Charr or Hammer.Maxsplit wrote:Very much so![]()
He is a former gatekeeper. Once you lose successive landslide decisions to Manuel Charr and Christian Hammer your days as a gatekeeper to world level are over. Unless you consider Charr & Hammer world level!
He's just an awkward international journeyman now, sadly.
With a bit more motivation and application things could have panned out differently.
Three defences at british level? No thanksHorse wrote:Yes, Joshua should fight for the British title and he should try to win it outright.
Why not?Riddick Blowe wrote:Three defences at british level? No thanks
I doubt the board would approve of Dallas. He's barely in the domestic top 20.davie wrote:I like to see every good British fighter go for the title.
but i'd probably have liked to see him do it a few fights before now.
if he does go for it i've little interest in seeing him make 3 defences against Richard Towers, Tom Dallas and Ian Lewison
Didn't watch Charr, but I did watch Hammer fight.Horse wrote:Johnson didn't lose by a landslide to Charr or Hammer.Maxsplit wrote:Very much so![]()
He is a former gatekeeper. Once you lose successive landslide decisions to Manuel Charr and Christian Hammer your days as a gatekeeper to world level are over. Unless you consider Charr & Hammer world level!
He's just an awkward international journeyman now, sadly.
With a bit more motivation and application things could have panned out differently.
Did you watch those fights?
I scored it for Johnson by two. I don't think many thought it was a wide win for Hammer.Maxsplit wrote:Didn't watch Charr, but I did watch Hammer fight.
Landslide is perhaps unfair, but wide was definitely the case with Hammer. Johnson just doesn't throw any combos, powers shots or anything other than a jab. He has a great jab tbf.
I just see Johnson as wasted talent.
Which is kind of the point I'm trying to makeHorse wrote:I doubt the board would approve of Dallas. He's barely in the domestic top 20.davie wrote:I like to see every good British fighter go for the title.
but i'd probably have liked to see him do it a few fights before now.
if he does go for it i've little interest in seeing him make 3 defences against Richard Towers, Tom Dallas and Ian Lewison
I also highly doubt his three defences would be that rubbish. Which of those would be his mandatory?
I don't see why not.davie wrote:Fury, Chisora and Price (or Haye) aren't going to be interested in fighting for the British title again
Probably not.davie wrote:If Joshua holds it I don't see them risking Hughie Fury against him (or vice versa) at domestic level
If they avoid Joshua then they are going nowhere anyway. Who are they going to cash out against, if not Joshua?davie wrote:Gary Cornish and Dillian White have 0's to protect and their handlers are unlikely to feed them to Joshua
Out of that lot only Sexton or McDermott would likely be chosen by Hearn.davie wrote:Thens there's the old guard of Sprot, Skelton, McDermot and Sexton (or god forbid Danny Williams)
Which leaves the names I mentioned or similarly uninspiring opposition like Ali Adams, Dorian Darch or Tom Little
Joshua is not a level beyond domestic level.davie wrote:There's hardly a deep pool of talent lining up for a shot at the British title and there'd be fewer still if AJ was the holder.
If I remember correctly, you now need to win the title and defend it 3 times. That's 4 domestic opponents you have to find to challenge a guy we already know is a level beyond that.
The only British opponents who give AJ a real test are beyond British title level and know it.
Yes I amHorse wrote:
You are mentioning low level, unrealistic opponents in an attempt to make trying to win the Lonsdale belt outright seem like a big step down and a waste of time.
Whyte (for the vacant title)davie wrote:Yes I am
Tell me the 4 UK fighters you would have AJ fight to win and make 3 subsequent defences against? And I'll pick holes in your argument!
So you've named 2 of the 3 names you told me you though he wouldn't fight as you "highly doubt his three defences would be that rubbish"Horse wrote:Whyte (for the vacant title)davie wrote:Yes I am
Tell me the 4 UK fighters you would have AJ fight to win and make 3 subsequent defences against? And I'll pick holes in your argument!
Lewison
Cornish/McDermott (winner of their scheduled July fight)
Price/Chisora (mandatory)
Other possibilities: Sexton, Rogan, Towers, H. Fury.
I mentioned Towers as a possible replacement for the more realistic and acceptable opponents.davie wrote:So you've named 2 of the 3 names you told me you though he wouldn't fight as you "highly doubt his three defences would be that rubbish"Horse wrote:Whyte (for the vacant title)
Lewison
Cornish/McDermott (winner of their scheduled July fight)
Price/Chisora (mandatory)
Other possibilities: Sexton, Rogan, Towers, H. Fury.![]()
He's a much better opponent than Darch, Adams, Little or Williams. I also only mentioned him as a possible replacement for one of the defences that I suggested.davie wrote:then you mention Rogan after telling me i was "mentioning low level, unrealistic opponents"
There's no good reason why he shouldn't though.davie wrote:I don't think AJ will fight for a British title, but I can categorically say he wont ever hold it outright.
not unless he gets found out on the way to the top and has to drop down a level.