Page 1 of 2

Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:44
by Mimmy
Just watching this fight while converting it. Why did Eubank let Thompson win? Eubank could have ended the fight at least 2 times in different rounds but refused to finish the job. What was his problem?

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:47
by keithmoonhangover
mimmy123 wrote:Just watching this fight while converting it. Why did Eubank let Thompson win? Eubank could have ended the fight at least 2 times in different rounds but refused to finish the job. What was his problem?
He was never the same after Watson.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:48
by handsofstone
mimmy123 wrote:Just watching this fight while converting it. Why did Eubank let Thompson win? Eubank could have ended the fight at least 2 times in different rounds but refused to finish the job. What was his problem?
Maybe the Watson fight

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:51
by Mimmy
I hear what you are saying there but he had had many fights after Watson some toughies, he never let up against Benn.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:57
by Noxy
You say Chris could have finished him but you have to remember it was Carl Thompson he was in with. Maybe he was just being cautious and with Thompson's track record, you couldn't blame him.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 15:57
by keithmoonhangover
mimmy123 wrote:I hear what you are saying there but he had had many fights after Watson some toughies, he never let up against Benn.
Eubank killed a man not long after the second Watson fight. Those two incidents would have massive psychological scars.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 16:18
by Boxerbeetle
Pretty sure it was the Watson fight. I'm sure I remember reading an interview with Eubank where he explained it wasn't so much the actual fighting that changed him, but it was the fact that Watson was caught coming in for the finish which always played on his mind when he had someone in trouble - he basically just didn't want to get caught coming in like Watson was.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 16:20
by kamicazze
Noticed you've been uploading fights mimmy. Some of which have had fidel Castro smith. You got any more of him, or Jawaid Khaliq? I know both personally and they'd love to get copies of their fights that they don't currently have

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 16:33
by rd350lc
Noxy wrote:You say Chris could have finished him but you have to remember it was Carl Thompson he was in with. Maybe he was just being cautious and with Thompson's track record, you couldn't blame him.
spot-on , that was how most of the cat's fights went and he was very dangerous when hurt himself , was a real entertainer IMO

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 16:49
by Mimmy
kamicazze wrote:Noticed you've been uploading fights mimmy. Some of which have had fidel Castro smith. You got any more of him, or Jawaid Khaliq? I know both personally and they'd love to get copies of their fights that they don't currently have
Theres at least 2 fights up, He was called Slugger otoole early on and I think there is a fight already up unless I changed his name to Smith in tha tfight. im pretty sure I have a few more. keep looking in the forum where I am putting the tapes up with the fights on them.

The other guy I may have 1 on the undercard of Rhodes v Grant fight

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 15 Jun 2015, 17:16
by palooka
keithmoonhangover wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Just watching this fight while converting it. Why did Eubank let Thompson win? Eubank could have ended the fight at least 2 times in different rounds but refused to finish the job. What was his problem?
He was never the same after Watson.
:TU: in a nutshell.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 00:33
by SteveDow
Yes. I particularly remember the Wharton fight as an example of this where Eubank at one point was expressly calling for the ref to step in and stop the fight to prevent Wharton from taking any further punishment. Basically Eubank totally lost his killer instinct after Watson.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 04:29
by stujones
Eubank did win IMO.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 04:42
by Tuan_Jim
Thompson was too dangerous to rush in on when he was hurt, plus he was a big powerhouse cruiserweight. I think Eubank didn't want to get caught the way he caught Watson.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 05:39
by Tomasino
keithmoonhangover wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:I hear what you are saying there but he had had many fights after Watson some toughies, he never let up against Benn.
Eubank killed a man not long after the second Watson fight. Those two incidents would have massive psychological scars.

Who did he kill?

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 05:43
by Ketchel
He hit a guy with his car. I think the guy was a labourer. Lawlor I think his name was.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 05:45
by jamesmcdonnell
Tuan_Jim wrote:Thompson was too dangerous to rush in on when he was hurt, plus he was a big powerhouse cruiserweight. I think Eubank didn't want to get caught the way he caught Watson.
Thompson also had a knack of playing dead on the ropes and then smashing the living daylights out of his opponent as they came in.

He did the same to Sebastien Rothstein, he looked to all intents and purposes finished, and then uncorked a right hand of the ropes that absolutely polaxed Rothstein.

Carl Thompson was a VERY dangerous man when hurt, and could end a fight with one punch - Eubank was probably not quite as close to stopping Thomson as it appeared.

There's quite a few fighters learned the hard way not to go in for the kill against Thompson.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 05:56
by big lennox
The thing that impressed me about these fights is that Eubank was a career Super Middleweight, who probably should have moved up to light heavy, but yet here he was in with a world class puncher at cruiserweight and the punches just bounced off his chin. Eubank had one of the all time great chins, I think.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 06:21
by Tuan_Jim
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Thompson was too dangerous to rush in on when he was hurt, plus he was a big powerhouse cruiserweight. I think Eubank didn't want to get caught the way he caught Watson.
Thompson also had a knack of playing dead on the ropes and then smashing the living daylights out of his opponent as they came in.

He did the same to Sebastien Rothstein, he looked to all intents and purposes finished, and then uncorked a right hand of the ropes that absolutely polaxed Rothstein.

Carl Thompson was a VERY dangerous man when hurt, and could end a fight with one punch - Eubank was probably not quite as close to stopping Thomson as it appeared.

There's quite a few fighters learned the hard way not to go in for the kill against Thompson.
Exactly - in the heat of the moment I wouldn't want to take it for granted that Thompson was done. It still irks me that he wasn't allowed to fight on versus Johnny Nelson.

Dwight Qawi was another specialist at appearing hurt, only to fling out some hellfire at his unsuspecting assailant. The fighter who can play dead and possesses one-punch power must be among the most dangerous opponents there is!

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 08:14
by jamesmcdonnell
Yes, that was bad luck for Thompson, he often looked hurt because he didn't have great coordination, so he was often stumbling around when under fire.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 10:31
by Mimmy
Ketchel wrote:He hit a guy with his car. I think the guy was a labourer. Lawlor I think his name was.
Without googling I think it was a highways worker im sure he lost control of his Landrover?

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 10:38
by littlepug
didn't he also blind a guy at a firework display ?

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 11:07
by Mimmy
littlepug wrote:didn't he also blind a guy at a firework display ?
Yeh I remember that in brighton

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 16 Jun 2015, 11:11
by jamesmcdonnell
mimmy123 wrote:
Ketchel wrote:He hit a guy with his car. I think the guy was a labourer. Lawlor I think his name was.
Without googling I think it was a highways worker im sure he lost control of his Landrover?
Yes, he lost control of his land rover on the motorway, and by sheer bad luck, careered into someone working at the side.

Re: Eubank v Thompson 1

Posted: 19 Jun 2015, 15:35
by Autobarn
Eubank v Thompson 1 is one of the greatest fights staged in Britain.

Thompson did look in shock early, he'd never been hit with that level of speed and accuracy, early.

In hindsight Chris eubank should have tried to finish, because Thompson took the shots better in the brutally hard late exchanges. And took eubank's eye late - which would seal his fate in the rematch.

Similar with Collins, whom The Weird One dropped much more heavily if I recall correctly.

I think Chris Could have stopped both, but he had a strange temperament and may have been thinking about saving energy. Not to mention being worried about what happened in the rematch with Watson.