Page 1 of 2
Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 06 Aug 2015, 23:52
by CrazyHorse
Current WW
#1. Floyd Mayweather - WBC WBA
#2. Manny Pacquiao
#3. Kell Brook - IBF
#4. Timothy Bradley
#5. Shawn Porter
#6. Danny Garcia
#7. Amir Khan
#8. Marcos Maidana
#9. Keith Thurman
#10. Devon Alexander
Bottom line is Kell Brook deserves a shot at any of the top 5 or 10 for that matter in the WW division. Kell has the tools to give Floyd and Manny problems and possibly beat them.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 03:14
by Ricky_
Pac
Floyd
Bradley
Brook
Porter
Garcia
Maidana
Khan
Thurman
Sadam Ali
Algieri
Spence
Put my top 12 because i wanted to inc Ali and Spence. It's really difficult to predict the boxing landscape even a year or 2 down the line but i can see Ali and Spence being among the WW champions. Brooks time is limited imo, he looks big at the weight and will eventually move up. Brook and Bradley will almost certainly fight, either at 147 or 154.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 04:10
by Ezzard
Mayweather
Brook
Bradley
Porter
Thurman
Khan
Maidana
Ali
Pacquiao
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 10:46
by dagilechia
Mayweather
Maidana
Pacquiao
Brook
Marquez (I believe he's still in good shape)
Garcia
Bradley
Thurman
Khan
Porter
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 11:01
by sweetscience
no berto ?
I looked at where berto was on boxrecs rankings the other day... its crazy Floyd picked him
he is the 14th Best is USA

Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 11:34
by Horse
1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Manny Pacquiao
3. Timothy Bradley
4. Juan Manuel Marquez (Inactive)
5. Kell Brook
6. Keith Thurman
7. Marcos Maidana
8. Shawn Porter
9. Amir Khan
10. Danny Garcia
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 20:30
by Badhusker
1. Mayweather
2. Brook
3. Porter
4. Maidana
5. Pacquiao
6. Bradley
7. Thurman
8. Garcia
9. Khan
10. Spence
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 07 Aug 2015, 22:37
by KBB
1. Mayweather
2. Bradley
3. Marquez
4. Manny
5. Porter
6. Brook
7. Khan
8. Maidana
9. Thurman
10.Alexander
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 18:43
by digzee
KBB wrote:1. Mayweather
2. Bradley
3. Marquez
4. Manny
5. Porter
6. Brook
7. Khan
8. Maidana
9. Thurman
10.Alexander
You thought Porter best Brook? If Brook fought Broner Broner wouldn't hear the final bell.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 19:21
by KBB
digzee wrote:KBB wrote:1. Mayweather
2. Bradley
3. Marquez
4. Manny
5. Porter
6. Brook
7. Khan
8. Maidana
9. Thurman
10.Alexander
You thought Porter best Brook? If Brook fought Broner Broner wouldn't hear the final bell.
It's not about who I think beats who, it's about who has beaten the better competition. Porter has beaten Malignaggi and Broner, Brook has beaten only Alexander who compares.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 19:26
by digzee
KBB wrote:digzee wrote:KBB wrote:1. Mayweather
2. Bradley
3. Marquez
4. Manny
5. Porter
6. Brook
7. Khan
8. Maidana
9. Thurman
10.Alexander
You thought Porter best Brook? If Brook fought Broner Broner wouldn't hear the final bell.
It's not about who I think beats who, it's about who has beaten the better competition. Porter has beaten Malignaggi and Broner, Brook has beaten only Alexander who compares.
No, Brook beat Porter not Alexander4. Khan beat Alexander.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 19:34
by KBB
digzee wrote:No, Brook beat Porter not Alexander4. Khan beat Alexander.
My bad, I meant he only beat Alexander but Porter has bigger wins in comparison to Brook.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 19:40
by digzee
KBB wrote:digzee wrote:No, Brook beat Porter not Alexander4. Khan beat Alexander.
My bad, I meant he only beat Alexander but Porter has bigger wins in comparison to Brook.
He hasn't fought Alexander, his only big win is Porter. Porter has only 1 decent win, so if you rate porter at 5 then that's a great win on Brook's record, Porter hasn't beat a top 5 WW.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 08 Aug 2015, 20:06
by KBB
digzee wrote:KBB wrote:digzee wrote:No, Brook beat Porter not Alexander4. Khan beat Alexander.
My bad, I meant he only beat Alexander but Porter has bigger wins in comparison to Brook.
He hasn't fought Alexander, his only big win is Porter. Porter has only 1 decent win, so if you rate porter at 5 then that's a great win on Brook's record, Porter hasn't beat a top 5 WW.
Porter has a big win over Alexander and one over Malignaggi but those wins are more significant than what Brook has done who only has Porter on his resume.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 02:34
by ClivePatrickLyons
[quote="sweetscience"]no berto ?
I looked at where berto was on boxrecs rankings the other day... its crazy Floyd picked him
he is the 14th Best is USA

[/quote
That is fantastic

ranked 14th in the states THIS TRULY SHOWS HE IS NOT TBE

Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 02:53
by KBB
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:sweetscience wrote:no berto ?
I looked at where berto was on boxrecs rankings the other day... its crazy Floyd picked him
he is the 14th Best is USA

[/quote
That is fantastic

ranked 14th in the states THIS TRULY SHOWS HE IS NOT TBE

Yeah because fighting one buddy fight negates all the other great victories he's had,

Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 03:43
by Emil
#1. Floyd Mayweather
#2. Manny Pacquiao
#3. Marcos Maidana
#4. Robert Guerrero
#5. Victor Ortiz
#6. Andre Berto
#7. Zab Judah
#8. Devon Alexander
#9. Keith Thurman
#10. Danny Garcia
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 04:02
by NateJR
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
2. Manny Pacquiao
3. Kell Brook
4. Keith Thurman
5. Marcos Madaina
6. Timothy Bradley
7. Shawn Porter
8. Danny Garcia
9. Amir Khan
10. Robert Guerrero
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 04:53
by Ricky_
digzee wrote:KBB wrote:digzee wrote:No, Brook beat Porter not Alexander4. Khan beat Alexander.
My bad, I meant he only beat Alexander but Porter has bigger wins in comparison to Brook.
He hasn't fought Alexander, his only big win is Porter. Porter has only 1 decent win, so if you rate porter at 5 then that's a great win on Brook's record, Porter hasn't beat a top 5 WW.
Newsflash: Brut knows nothing about boxing. He only posts here to defend Floyds honor like a crazy superfan who probably has a restraining order.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 05:12
by KBB
Ricky_ wrote:digzee wrote:Newsflash: Brut knows nothing about boxing. He only posts here to defend Floyds honor like a crazy superfan who probably has a restraining order.
Idiot. It was a simple mistake.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 12:13
by Tanzio
KBB wrote:digzee wrote:KBB wrote:
My bad, I meant he only beat Alexander but Porter has bigger wins in comparison to Brook.
He hasn't fought Alexander, his only big win is Porter. Porter has only 1 decent win, so if you rate porter at 5 then that's a great win on Brook's record, Porter hasn't beat a top 5 WW.
Porter has a big win over Alexander and one over Malignaggi but those wins are more significant than what Brook has done who only has Porter on his resume.
Two mistakes, turB, compounded by your lame attempt to defend your position that Porter is better p4p than a dude he lost to decisively.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 15:48
by palooka
CrazyHorse wrote:Current WW
#1. Floyd Mayweather - WBC WBA
#2. Manny Pacquiao
#3. Kell Brook - IBF
#4. Timothy Bradley
#5. Shawn Porter
#6. Danny Garcia
#7. Amir Khan
#8. Marcos Maidana
#9. Keith Thurman
#10. Devon Alexander
Bottom line is Kell Brook deserves a shot at any of the top 5 or 10 for that matter in the WW division. Kell has the tools to give Floyd and Manny problems and possibly beat them.
Brook is too high, his title winning bout was very close and his two challengers since have been hand picked no hopers. Brook is very strong and a big welter but there's no way that he is number 3 welter, he's had one real win (very close) at world level.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 17:24
by KBB
Tanzio wrote:Two mistakes, turB, compounded by your lame attempt to defend your position that Porter is better p4p than a dude he lost to decisively.
that's your own opinion, this is my list and if I wanted to i could put whoever i want on it. i put Porter ahead of Brook because Shawn has better quality wins over him despite the loss to him, not that I have to justify anything to you.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 17:41
by digzee
palooka wrote:CrazyHorse wrote:Current WW
#1. Floyd Mayweather - WBC WBA
#2. Manny Pacquiao
#3. Kell Brook - IBF
#4. Timothy Bradley
#5. Shawn Porter
#6. Danny Garcia
#7. Amir Khan
#8. Marcos Maidana
#9. Keith Thurman
#10. Devon Alexander
Bottom line is Kell Brook deserves a shot at any of the top 5 or 10 for that matter in the WW division. Kell has the tools to give Floyd and Manny problems and possibly beat them.
Brook is too high, his title winning bout was very close and his two challengers since have been hand picked no hopers. Brook is very strong and a big welter but there's no way that he is number 3 welter, he's had one real win (very close) at world level.
Apart from maybe Bradley and the obvious 2 who should be ahead of him? DG has no good wins at WW, MM lost to Alexander, cant put Porter ahead of him (I didn't think it was that close, the only clean effective work came from Kell), Thurman has only 1 good win himself (Guerrero) and should of made easier work of Collazo if he was better then Kell, Khan doesn't have as big of a name on his WW record like Kell has Porter.
When PBF retires in May Kell will hopefully have 2 more big wins and be recognised by most as No.2 at worst by most, although I'd bet money now that he beats Pac.
Re: Rank your top 10 WW
Posted: 09 Aug 2015, 17:42
by punchoutsb
KBB wrote:digzee wrote:KBB wrote:1. Mayweather
2. Bradley
3. Marquez
4. Manny
5. Porter
6. Brook
7. Khan
8. Maidana
9. Thurman
10.Alexander
You thought Porter best Brook? If Brook fought Broner Broner wouldn't hear the final bell.
It's not about who I think beats who, it's about who has beaten the better competition. Porter has beaten Malignaggi and Broner, Brook has beaten only Alexander who compares.
I'm not calling you out or anything, but if your list is based on body of work (who has beaten better comp) then why are Bradley and JMM in front of Pac? Or do you use different criteria for different fighters?