Better pure boxing skill? Cotto Alvarez
Posted: 11 Aug 2015, 17:35
Which fighter would you say has better pure BOXING SKILL? Please discuss
But what we tend to forget is boxers just like any other athletes have off nights, cotto definately looked a little off in that fight. If they rematched I would pick cottoBadhusker wrote:Cotto may have an edge in some areas, but not much imo. Trout easily out-boxed Cotto, but didn't have such an easy time with Canelo.
This is an interesting fight, and contrast of styles. I think Canelo wins it by decision or late stoppage.
You mean "the most overrated boxer in history?"NateJR wrote:I agree, easily cotto based on his footwork. I see this as a very even fight and expect it to be close on fight night. I'll be puling for Cotto but doubt he gets the nodin a close fight..
Of course they are choosing opponents carefully, and I despise catch weights, but Cotto's improved timing and leverage since employing Roche cannot be denied, and I am no fan of the man.Badhusker wrote:I'll admit Cotto has looked great in his last 3 fights, but I'm not quite convinced he is better than he used to be. Roach is great at choosing opponents at the right time or style to make his fighters look better than they actually are. Add to that the catchweight BS. Lara, for example, would make Cotto look even worse than Trout did, so they won't fight him. Another they won't fight is Andrade. Another bad style match.
I kind of lean this way on the result.It will either be a tough fought close ud for Cottocaldo2025 wrote:Cotto does have the better boxing skill but Cotto has had problems with Mexican Style in the past. I don't think that Cotto can hurt Canelo and Canelo will keep chasing him down and cutting off the ring and I think that the tide changes for good around the 8th. Either Cotto wins limping into the finish line or Canelo gets a knock out IMO.
I think people need to pump the breaks on Cotto though. He's getting way more clout for his last 3 fights than he should. Two marginal boxers at best and 1 legend who was 40 years old with bad knees. Canelo is way different animal and he's flying high after a couple of eye opening wins against way better boxers (though i did have Lara winning that bout but i'm glad Lara didn't get the W for the style he chose for the fight).tiny_acres wrote: I kind of lean this way on the result.It will either be a tough fought close ud for Cotto
or a 8-10th round ko for Canelo.
But no matter who wins I want to see it.To me this is a pretty even match up.
I think youre strongly mistaken on cotto not being able to hurt canelo. Boxing ability is cottos biggest advantage over ginger and given he does not have that one punch ko power, he does have that thudding power which is enough to break you down.caldo2025 wrote:Cotto does have the better boxing skill but Cotto has had problems with Mexican Style in the past. I don't think that Cotto can hurt Canelo and Canelo will keep chasing him down and cutting off the ring and I think that the tide changes for good around the 8th. Either Cotto wins limping into the finish line or Canelo gets a knock out IMO.
he was 39 and a few months, less than a year older than floyd is right now,caldo2025 wrote:1 legend who was 40 years old with bad knees.
People age differently. Though I agree that Cotto was very very good that night, that Martinez was the worst Sergio I'd ever seen. The slide was already visible from the Murray fight.sucracristo wrote:he was 39 and a few months, less than a year older than floyd is right now,caldo2025 wrote:1 legend who was 40 years old with bad knees.
same as wlad right now, almost 3 years younger than jmm is right now,
11 years younger than bhop is now, 7 years younger than tarver is now,
3 years younger than bundrage is right now, about 6 months older than adoins
stevenson is right now, within about 3 years of a dozen other current titlists
and top contenders, and younger than countless other titlists in the past.
as far as his knees go, cotto counterpunched. it wasn't a lack of footspeed
that determined the outcome of that fight. cotto had much better hands and
defense. that version of cotto would have ko'd the version of martinez who
defended against JCCjr just as quickly. that same version of martinez who fought
cotto would have beaten several guys in the bottom of the top 15, and maybe
a couple in the top 10. cotto is legitimately among the top 5 middleweights.
fighters age differently, martinez relied alot on his legs for his effectiveness inside the ring. nobody with a level head on their shoulders can say that was the same martinez in there as the jcc fight. cotto might be a top fighter in mw but there is a reason he said to kellerman AM I A REAL MIDDLEWEIGHT? or something to that effect. cotto knows ggg is king of the division and doesnt want to take a beating when there are better money fights out theresucracristo wrote:he was 39 and a few months, less than a year older than floyd is right now,caldo2025 wrote:1 legend who was 40 years old with bad knees.
same as wlad right now, almost 3 years younger than jmm is right now,
11 years younger than bhop is now, 7 years younger than tarver is now,
3 years younger than bundrage is right now, about 6 months older than adoins
stevenson is right now, within about 3 years of a dozen other current titlists
and top contenders, and younger than countless other titlists in the past.
as far as his knees go, cotto counterpunched. it wasn't a lack of footspeed
that determined the outcome of that fight. cotto had much better hands and
defense. that version of cotto would have ko'd the version of martinez who
defended against JCCjr just as quickly. that same version of martinez who fought
cotto would have beaten several guys in the bottom of the top 15, and maybe
a couple in the top 10. cotto is legitimately among the top 5 middleweights.