Page 1 of 2
RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 10:09
by Aaronide_ger
Who did you want Floyd Mayweather to fight in September 12th. as of 22/8/15
Total Votes: 14,069
1. Gennady Golovkin: 6996 Votes (49,73%)
2. Amir Khan: 1629 Votes (11,58%)
3. Keith Thurman: 1327 votes (9,43%)
4. Kell Brook: 1089 Votes (7,74%)
5. Tim Bradley: 593 Votes (4,21%)
6. Miguel Cotto: 533 Votes (3,79%)
7. Other: 416 Votes (2,96%)
8. Erislandy Lara: 345 Votes (2,45%)
9. Danny Garcia: 331 Votes (2,35%)
10. Terence Crawford: 291 Votes (2,07%)
11. Lucas Matthysse: 217 Votes (1,54%)
12. Andre Berto: 192 Votes (1,36%)
13. Shawn Porter: 110 Votes (0,78%)
What do you have to say?
Source
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 10:18
by Rexob
Kell Brook for me.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 12:12
by Tanzio
Aaronide_ger wrote:Who did you want Floyd Mayweather to fight in September 12th. as of 22/8/15
Total Votes: 14,069
1. Gennady Golovkin: 6996 Votes (49,73%)
2. Amir Khan: 1629 Votes (11,58%)
3. Keith Thurman: 1327 votes (9,43%)
4. Kell Brook: 1089 Votes (7,74%)
5. Tim Bradley: 593 Votes (4,21%)
6. Miguel Cotto: 533 Votes (3,79%)
7. Other: 416 Votes (2,96%)
8. Erislandy Lara: 345 Votes (2,45%)
9. Danny Garcia: 331 Votes (2,35%)
10. Terence Crawford: 291 Votes (2,07%)
11. Lucas Matthysse: 217 Votes (1,54%)
12. Andre Berto: 192 Votes (1,36%)
13. Shawn Porter: 110 Votes (0,78%)
What do you have to say?
Source
Every single individual listed besides Berto would have been adequate. Cotto would have been my second to least favorite.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 12:21
by koolkc107
My first choice would be a Cotto or Canelo rematch.
After that, Tim Bradley or Thurman.
Then Khan, Porter, Brook, or Garcia (each of whom, IMO, would have about the same chance of beating Floyd...none).
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 13:12
by Tony1244
GGG for me. Only competitive fight.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 14:15
by Pureist
Tony's spot on with my thinking
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 17:22
by sucracristo
wow, berto actually got 192 votes, more than porter.
i'm sure if they let people place all the options in order instead of just a straight
vote, the list would look different.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 18:04
by punchoutsb
sucracristo wrote:wow, berto actually got 192 votes, more than porter.
i'm sure if they let people place all the options in order instead of just a straight
vote, the list would look different.
190 of those were probably the two or three Floyd worshipers on this site multi voting

Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2015, 20:20
by Redback Rasta
Tony1244 wrote:GGG for me. Only competitive fight.
GGG would have been best and Mayweather did go to the trouble of saying he thought he could beat GGG. Though he obviously never intended to try and prove it, and who could blame him.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 04:59
by sucracristo
punchoutsb wrote:sucracristo wrote:wow, berto actually got 192 votes, more than porter.
i'm sure if they let people place all the options in order instead of just a straight
vote, the list would look different.
190 of those were probably the two or three Floyd worshipers on this site multi voting

or one in particular we are both thinking about logging in under all his usernames
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 05:54
by PredatorHayds
Khan for me.
Still would love to see Floyd at his advancing age deal with AK handspeed.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 06:13
by SFW
Bradley seemed the logical choice to me
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 08:15
by ikorolev
Redback Rasta wrote:Tony1244 wrote:GGG for me. Only competitive fight.
GGG would have been best and Mayweather did go to the trouble of saying he thought he could beat GGG. Though he obviously never intended to try and prove it, and who could blame him.
Very similar to Froch who said that he is too strong for GGG and retired after that.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:15
by Redback Rasta
ikorolev wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:Tony1244 wrote:GGG for me. Only competitive fight.
GGG would have been best and Mayweather did go to the trouble of saying he thought he could beat GGG. Though he obviously never intended to try and prove it, and who could blame him.
Very similar to Froch who said that he is too strong for GGG and retired after that.
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:26
by koolkc107
Redback Rasta wrote:ikorolev wrote:
Very similar to Froch who said that he is too strong for GGG and retired after that.
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:29
by Redback Rasta
koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:ikorolev wrote:
Very similar to Froch who said that he is too strong for GGG and retired after that.
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Give me a yell when someone beats him

Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:45
by ikorolev
koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:ikorolev wrote:
Very similar to Froch who said that he is too strong for GGG and retired after that.
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Really, and who is in your list ?
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:46
by punchoutsb
ikorolev wrote:
Really, and who is in your list ?
koolkc107 is not good at listing names...
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:47
by koolkc107
Redback Rasta wrote:koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Give me a yell when someone beats him

Will do, as soon as he finally decides to fight someone who actually has a legit chance to do so.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:48
by koolkc107
ikorolev wrote:koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:
The list who would prefer to talk about fighting GGG than actually doing it is growing.
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Really, and who is in your list ?
You first, since you mentioned lists first.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:54
by ikorolev
koolkc107 wrote:ikorolev wrote:koolkc107 wrote:
Maybe THAT list IS growing, but not nearly as fast as the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Really, and who is in your list ?
You first, since you mentioned lists first.
I did not mention any lists.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:56
by ikorolev
koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:
Give me a yell when someone beats him

Will do, as soon as he finally decides to fight someone who actually has a legit chance to do so.
Like Beterbiev, Lebedev or Klitchko ?
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 21:57
by koolkc107
ikorolev wrote:koolkc107 wrote:ikorolev wrote:
Really, and who is in your list ?
You first, since you mentioned lists first.
I did not mention any lists.
No, you're right, that was one of the other GGG fanboys.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 22:25
by ikorolev
koolkc107 wrote:ikorolev wrote:
I did not mention any lists.
No, you're right, that was one of the other GGG fanboys.
So, can you produce a list you mention here ?
koolkc107 wrote:the list of guys GGG said he'd fight only to find excuses not to.
Re: RINGTV Poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2015, 22:29
by Redback Rasta
ikorolev wrote:koolkc107 wrote:Redback Rasta wrote:
Give me a yell when someone beats him

Will do, as soon as he finally decides to fight someone who actually has a legit chance to do so.
Like Beterbiev, Lebedev or Klitchko ?
