Pure boxers.
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 13:56
Who would you say are good examples of pure boxers?
Page 1 of 1
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 16:21
Richie Woodhall.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 18:07
Lucas Browne
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 18:14
handsofstone wrote:Lucas Browne
Juan Domingo Roldan, Carlos Manuel Baldomir & Jorge Fernando Castro.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 04:30
ray mancini, ruslan provodnikov, arturo gatti, tony galento, jake lamotta
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 04:50
Willie Pep.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 05:03
Pernell Whittaker
Floyd Mayweather Jr
Guillermo Rigondeaux
Juan Manuel Marquez
James Toney
Floyd Mayweather Jr
Guillermo Rigondeaux
Juan Manuel Marquez
James Toney
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 05:07
Peter Richardson
Lomachenko
Gilberto Roman
Peter Culshaw
Jason Rowland
Duke McKenzie
Colin McMillan
Lomachenko
Gilberto Roman
Peter Culshaw
Jason Rowland
Duke McKenzie
Colin McMillan
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 05:32
Virgil Hill.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 05:35
handsofstone wrote:Lucas Browne
The Dancing destroyer
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 05:37
Peter Buckley was a good pure boxer, particularly when he was going for the win.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 14:06
Yes, he absolutely mastered the art of the "punch bag style"palooka wrote:Peter Buckley was a good pure boxer, particularly when he was going for the win.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 14:08
He was very rarely caught flush and even !more rarely hurt, Buckley had a fantastic defense and knew what an opponent was going to do next. He had an awful win/loss ratio but he could box alright.Rexob wrote:Yes, he absolutely mastered the art of the "punch bag style"palooka wrote:Peter Buckley was a good pure boxer, particularly when he was going for the win.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 14:11
palooka wrote:He was very rarely caught flush and even !more rarely hurt, Buckley had a fantastic defense and knew what an opponent was going to do next. He had an awful win/loss ratio but he could box alright.Rexob wrote:Yes, he absolutely mastered the art of the "punch bag style"palooka wrote:Peter Buckley was a good pure boxer, particularly when he was going for the win.
Very underrated.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 16:37
Ricardo Lopez
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 22:35
Jeff [flash] Malcolm 
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 06:37
I always thought Wayne McCullough looked very natural.
Prince was also very natural.
Prince was also very natural.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 07:47
Good call on McMillan he really was a joy to watchpalooka wrote:Peter Richardson
Lomachenko
Gilberto Roman
Peter Culshaw
Jason Rowland
Duke McKenzie
Colin McMillan
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 10:04
Thank you and I'd forgotten to include Paulie Mallignagi on the list. For a light hitting boxer to fight at the top level, get some good wins and cause problems for fantastic fighters shows what an excellent boxer Paulie was.littlepug wrote:Good call on McMillan he really was a joy to watchpalooka wrote:Peter Richardson
Lomachenko
Gilberto Roman
Peter Culshaw
Jason Rowland
Duke McKenzie
Colin McMillan
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 12:52
John Conteh.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 13:20
Benny Leonard
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 14:27
By pure boxer, I mean a fighter who has great technical skills, and wins decisions.
Re: Pure boxers.
Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 19:42
I always enjoy watching Yuki Nonaka, a boxer style. Cuenca? Miguel Vazquez?