Page 1 of 2
ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 16:00
by mullenman
Joshua versus white is ppv
I will buy it as it will be a good event but I think it's unfair of match room and sky sports having so much ppv boxing
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 16:40
by Stuarty
Was always only going to be a matter of time before AJ was on PPV but as good a fight as this is there is no way it's PPV worthy. Hopefully there is a good card to soften the blow slightly.
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 16:45
by CharlesListon
I remember when Adam Smith took over the reigns and sorted the Matchroom Deal, he said that they wouldn't be doing PPV anymore. Here we are just a couple of years later and it seems like we're getting shafted on PPV cards every couple of months.
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 16:48
by Stuarty
CharlesListon wrote:I remember when Adam Smith took over the reigns and sorted the Matchroom Deal, he said that they wouldn't be doing PPV anymore. Here we are just a couple of years later and it seems like we're getting shafted on PPV cards every couple of months.
Yeah true. That didn't last long.
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 16:57
by Boxerbeetle
I haven't seen this announced as PPV?
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 19:15
by mike john
Stuarty30 wrote:Was always only going to be a matter of time before AJ was on PPV but as good a fight as this is there is no way it's PPV worthy. Hopefully there is a good card to soften the blow slightly.
as good a fight as this is? this is a fair fight for joshua to take at this stage of his development, nothing more.
what percentage had even heard of whyte before he was put forward as joshuas latest victim? this isnt even approaching the bellew cleverly rematch in terms of ppv legitimacy.
as i see it, anyone shelling out on this loses the right to ever complain about ppv again
Re: ppv
Posted: 21 Sep 2015, 22:22
by digzee
We are going to get a 'stacked card' again and to be honest I enjoyed the last one (Selby and Mitchell world title fights were good matchups), but will AJ then fight on a non PPV card again? Will he want to? I wouldn't be surprised if we have 4 PPV's next year.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 02:10
by Nightmare Roy
I'm glad I sacked Sky off a fees years ago, complete pizz take all these PPV events.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 04:33
by Marlo Stanfield
So when December comes we would have had 4 PPVs in the space of 13 months? Maybe Frank wasn't bullshitting after all
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 04:35
by Marlo Stanfield
5 actually with the Mayweather Pacquiao fight
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 05:41
by freddydoesdallas
Why does this fight need to be PPV? It's not to cover the purse of Joshua, it won't be to cover the purse of Whyte and this is the headline fight.
There will be plenty of people who will only watch this fight because Joshua is on and they won't give a monkeys about having a 'stacked' card.
If this was the headline on a saturday night with a decent British title fight as the main support with a couple of English level title fights then this would be a cracking card in my view.
I was going to buy Wlad v Fury next month but as a matter of principle i might sack that off now. I'll not be bent over a barrell
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 06:00
by mickey1975
This is nowhere near the level of Lewis-Mason or Lewis-Williams, both live on BBC 1.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 06:45
by Stuarty
mike john wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Was always only going to be a matter of time before AJ was on PPV but as good a fight as this is there is no way it's PPV worthy. Hopefully there is a good card to soften the blow slightly.
as good a fight as this is? this is a fair fight for joshua to take at this stage of his development, nothing more.
what percentage had even heard of whyte before he was put forward as joshuas latest victim? this isnt even approaching the bellew cleverly rematch in terms of ppv legitimacy.
as i see it, anyone shelling out on this loses the right to ever complain about ppv again
You wouldn't say it's a good match up? Two young prospects putting their records on the line, bad blood between them. I'd say it's a very good match up for this stage in their careers and we need more of the same over here. I didn't say it was PPV worthy but it's a good match up.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 07:25
by Boxerbeetle
So is this actually confirmed as PPV?
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 07:35
by Andrew
Boxerbeetle wrote:So is this actually confirmed as PPV?
Will be Hearn says he is not doing a press conference after Fury v Klitschko so makes sense.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 07:47
by mickey1975
Naandrew wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:So is this actually confirmed as PPV?
Will be Hearn says he is not doing a press conference after Fury v Klitschko so makes sense.
And if that's a crap fight, which it could be, this will be an even harder sell.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 07:54
by Boxerbeetle
Well I definitely won't be buying it, and I can't see many people buying a PPV so close to Christmas.
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 08:05
by ThereByTheGrace
No way ! Dont pay !
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 11:28
by stujones
I'm still surprised that Coyle vs Campbell wasn't PPV. This is ridiculous.... Whyte hasn't done much to suggest he is any better than the likes of Cornish, Sprott etc. His best win was against a past it Mike Holden. If it was maybe a Stervine or Chagaev - e.g. someone with a WIN at world class and a bit proven, then mmm.... maybe - but someone as unproven as Whyte..... Rediculous.
I'm fully expecting a blow out within 3 rounds, unless Joshua has been given instructions to go rounds.
This could end up being as disastrous as Haye vs Harrison..... all sold on an amateur "rivalry".
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 11:39
by mike john
Stuarty30 wrote:mike john wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Was always only going to be a matter of time before AJ was on PPV but as good a fight as this is there is no way it's PPV worthy. Hopefully there is a good card to soften the blow slightly.
as good a fight as this is? this is a fair fight for joshua to take at this stage of his development, nothing more.
what percentage had even heard of whyte before he was put forward as joshuas latest victim? this isnt even approaching the bellew cleverly rematch in terms of ppv legitimacy.
as i see it, anyone shelling out on this loses the right to ever complain about ppv again
You wouldn't say it's a good match up? Two young prospects putting their records on the line, bad blood between them. I'd say it's a very good match up for this stage in their careers and we need more of the same over here. I didn't say it was PPV worthy but it's a good match up.
i stand by my comment
"this is a fair fight for joshua to take at this stage of his development, nothing more."
i fully expect an early joshua ko
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 11:49
by Andrew
But it will be a stacked card.........
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 14:40
by tony1234
Stacked card means more rubbish on SKY Sports Saturday night bills so subscribers get shafted both ways
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 14:53
by mullenman
Boxerbeetle wrote:So is this actually confirmed as PPV?
hearn trying to keep it quiet but I know its ppv
the undercard is going to be very good by the sounds of hearn in his last ifl interview
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 14:55
by mullenman
tony1234 wrote:Stacked card means more rubbish on SKY Sports Saturday night bills so subscribers get shafted both ways
I agree with that statement 100%
Re: ppv
Posted: 22 Sep 2015, 15:46
by brian13
mullenman wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:So is this actually confirmed as PPV?
hearn trying to keep it quiet but I know its ppv
the undercard is going to be very good by the sounds of hearn in his last ifl interview
Well DeGale surely has to fight soon anyway. I'd say after Mitchell's recent world title fight, he will be in some sort of eliminator fight, is it too soon for McDonnell to fight?
He has fighters that could do a PPV, wouldn't be a shock.