BoxRec

I think I -KNOW- the answer there. I see the multiplying of the governing organizations as,"THE PROBLEM". Being a FAN now for at least 45 years.....I DO FEEL I KNOW A Thing or two on topic.
I accept the WBC WBA IBF & WBO as equal powers. I view EVERYTHING OTHERWISE as "eligible" for a "second echelon" title. I could the '2e' as having a FIVE- U.S.A. States "power". The championship at that ~level~ has GOT-TO-BE *advertised! ["Truth in advertising" is the KEY!].
I have been on this point, since March/2007 when I founded the UWBCAFO-I.
Further: We know that these four accept one another because they each interlink one another. They DO NOT interlink any IBO IBU NBA WBF WBU IBC IBA w/ the IBO being the "worse cancer". Should I give a word about the IBO?
Look how LONG A TIME it took the WBO to become "accepted". The Ibo used "pure P.R. tricks" to "gain" THEIR ("somewhat") "acceptence".
How do I draw the LINE after the WBO? WELL.... (this) ask yourself the same question I ASKED MYSELF. "Do we really need FOUR GROUPS?" Answer: "Of course not!" 2ND Question: "Do we need FIVE ORGANIZATIONS?" (A) (if we don nee 4 don nee 5 don nee 6! We HAVE ABOUT 15 w/ WAA). So, anyone here will share this topic with me (?)

Bring back the championship rounds 13, 14 & 15.

Freedom wrote:Bring back the championship rounds 13, 14 & 15.

Do we really need 14? Can't we go straight from 13 to 15?

Freedom wrote:Bring back the championship rounds 13, 14 & 15.

You could have that in "spots", I think. "Selections"/Australia be a perfect spot to host it! ALL YOU NEED is commission approval! Of course, "host" of groups that will raise- up in ARMS against a such! But.."stand the ground", and you'll have it!
But, back to my main subject..about what I bring to the Sport: my work, of/the UWBCAFO-I/ Est. March/2007.
By the way I am a 50-50 Pro/am and on a comeback now since the past 2 1/2 years. See my stream at "Fights I would like to get into"/ "some" UGLY- dude on the "line" w/me there..
[email protected] if I should be "alerted" to return to this stream to talk it (the Boxing..)

^ ^ ^ I "wouldn't mind" to do a host of a 15 rounder. But..."tactics first". Let's say we engineer within the Sport on the "second echelon" ('2e') I propose. -Titles- after THE FIRST &MAJOR FOUR have a VALUE of approximately FIVE USA States. & we advertise it.
Many- many excellent fights to be made world wide right now. &..money is involved. & W/ myself,"constitution".
(Short note)

Freedom wrote:Bring back the championship rounds 13, 14 & 15.

No thanks. Could you imagine sitting through 3 more round of Wlad/Fury.... I'm actually in favor of less rounds. I feel it would up the action. Most fighters conserve too much for my taste in the long bouts. Lets have 5 round fights with 4 to 5 minute rounds.

^ ^ ^ "joker!" : )

The template of multiple governing bodies has already been set. Short of one going bankrupt -- the proliferation of titles and associated sanctioning fees makes that highly unlikely -- it's not going to improve.

Taki... wrote:The template of multiple governing bodies has already been set. Short of one going bankrupt -- the proliferation of titles and associated sanctioning fees makes that highly unlikely -- it's not going to improve.

Taki... wrote:The template of multiple governing bodies has already been set. <<

Everyone needs "money", my FRIEND! I work a JOB myself. I know how hard it is! STILL THOUGH, I don't be doing anything that will be going against my beliefs.
I think what you are saying is that it gonna be hard to "reel in" on a wide scope.
The veterans of this Sport know better. The wise ones WILL!
My intentions are, really, to first influence the INDIVIDUAL about my WORK & as far as "influence" within the FIRST &MAJOR FOUR..that is SOOOOOOOOOO important! Now, the '2e' who come on board....it's THEIR WISE!
And par what you say of "bankruptcy"! I'm that alright! Since the beginning! : ) ["no 'going' bankrupt", I operate there.. ]

Sanctioning bodies don't really matter any more. The more there are with interims, ordinary's, supers blah blah the more unifications and better fights. The IBO is actually the best of them all. If you want to out any it has to be the WBA their governance is super bad. The IBF don't even care about their rating system, WBO you just need to ponce a regional title. The WBC and the middleweight/155....yeah yeah...and now he is defending against a blown up super-lightweight....what if Khan won, not that he khan

^ ^ Lennox, I spoke to you in another section. You like I put a beed to that stream? I out-dueled you at EVERY TURN!
You have been involved in BOXING 26 years to my 50 years. You worked for the IBO for 15 years. Of course you gonna "toot" for them. As I say once before with you..YES/IBO had O.K. -RATINGS- but that's where it all ends. You are "really lost" with the THOUGHT you bring forward! I mean....for IT to "go over"/a person has to have NO MIND FOR DETAIL! You like I "quote you" on some of it. And NOW you've brought a NEW GROUP the PBO is it? PBU? And....I TRIED talking to you about that....but then, you profess the "group" to be a Neutrality.
Believe me, what Boxing needs, I bring it with my work, the UWBCAFO-I/ Est. March/2007.
We go with the "ESTABLISHMENT". WBC WBA IBF WBO. "Second Echelon" is OPEN to every group past the FIRST &MAJOR FOUR. They have a (approx.) FIVE USA States value. I can spell out our certain specifics. But..First rule of thumb is that the ECHELONS DON'T MIX. [Gennady Golovikin one, "mixer"]