BoxRec

after all it doesn't matter. most likely
the top of the sport is juicing and they
just differ in their methods of hiding it.

wouldn't take too much away from his
accomplishments. that he is not the
greatest truth teller and honest family
man has been cleared a while ago. so
relax haters, probably all of them do it.

if it's true is it then that he avoided
pac in his prime by false excuses about
PEDs? yes, but everyone knows he used
careful management to protect the "0".

no big deal in the end. but it would make
for a funny shit storm and probably a
rematch with pac in march if this gets
substantiated before december.

TUE?

davie wrote:TUE?

The Ugliest Ever? The Unlikeablist Ever? The Unmanliest Ever?

reggaereggae wrote:

davie wrote:TUE?

The Ugliest Ever? The Unlikeablist Ever? The Unmanliest Ever?

Sillys, it's short for TUESDAY

davie wrote:TUE?

Therapeutic Use Exemption.

man wrote:

davie wrote:TUE?

Therapeutic Use Exemption.

Yep the new favorite word of half of the boxrec's users.
Yet just a few short months ago no one even knew what the term meant.
But it is not thrown around as the term for the true diehard blow hards.

I always thought the "TMT" on Floyds hat stood for "The Money Team". It should stand for "Too Many Threads". There are already several very active threads on this...do we *really* need another?

punchoutsb wrote:I always thought the "TMT" on Floyds hat stood for "The Money Team". It should stand for "Too Many Threads". There are already several very active threads on this...do we *really* need another?

No doubt. I am so tired of all the crap.Let him and Pac go away.
The sport will be better off when we can all focus on active boxers.And not divas

man wrote:after all it doesn't matter. most likely
the top of the sport is juicing and they
just differ in their methods of hiding it.

wouldn't take too much away from his
accomplishments. that he is not the
greatest truth teller and honest family
man has been cleared a while ago. so
relax haters, probably all of them do it.

if it's true is it then that he avoided
pac in his prime by false excuses about
PEDs? yes, but everyone knows he used
careful management to protect the "0".

no big deal in the end. but it would make
for a funny poo storm and probably a
rematch with pac in march if this gets
substantiated before december.

Is there an honest point to your blabble?

davie wrote:TUE?

These Useless Emotions? Those Under Exemption? The Umpire Expects?

Television Uses Electricity?

Why did I log in to post this?

clopixolacuphase wrote:

davie wrote:TUE?

These Useless Emotions? Those Under Exemption? The Umpire Expects?

Television Uses Electricity?

Why did I log in to post this?

The last 1's my fav

T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!
T.U.E!

Badhusker wrote:

man wrote:after all it doesn't matter. most likely
the top of the sport is juicing and they
just differ in their methods of hiding it.

wouldn't take too much away from his
accomplishments. that he is not the
greatest truth teller and honest family
man has been cleared a while ago. so
relax haters, probably all of them do it.

if it's true is it then that he avoided
pac in his prime by false excuses about
PEDs? yes, but everyone knows he used
careful management to protect the "0".

no big deal in the end. but it would make
for a funny poo storm and probably a
rematch with pac in march if this gets
substantiated before december.

Is there an honest point to your blabble?

no.

In all my time of reading posts on boxing forums; this is the thread I most wasted my time ever reading.