Page 1 of 2
Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 26 Nov 2015, 19:54
by SteveDow
Huge twitter war going on! I'm backing Jane to KO kuges.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 05:25
by jamiem26
She's not coming out of it well.
Keeps on saying "Did i get u started?" when Kugan said straight away that she introduced them to a few people and boxing and that they were very grateful for that.
Fair play to her for making introductions but they still had to go and do it!
Buncey wading in as well, he's never liked Ifl.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 06:05
by johnswan1
I thought it was very funny. I watched the interview with Fury that started it. Fury said "did you take over this from Jane Couch"? to which Kugan replied "no, we were doing this before her". It has since been revealed by Jane that she was the one who helped the fame hungry Kugan get started.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 06:19
by MarkMcBurney
Wasn't surprised to see 'Big Daddy' Bunce get involved - he has always seemed like a bit of an arsehole to me..
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 06:39
by CharlesListon
You cant win an argument with Jane Couch.
You may end up being technically correct or morally right, but you will not beat her in a row!
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 06:48
by TheCobra
lol, I remember that phase when there were loads of vids of Jane Couch going round interviewing everyone. Basically seemed like an excuse for her to grope fit, young men - awkward and uncomfortable for most, including the viewers!
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 07:28
by mullenman
Ifl do a great job...
They are providing a free top class service
they work hard a deserve all the cash they get
people that give out about a free service are just negative people and I bet half them negative people don't have a job
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 08:01
by bripez
I wouldn't get into Twitter wars with Jane Couch - she doesn't seem the type to let a beef go.
Hopefully IFL will keep the cameras rolling the next time they both meet ! - koogi-baby might get chinned

Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 09:17
by chrisnew86
mullenman wrote:Ifl do a great job...
They are providing a free top class service
they work hard a deserve all the cash they get
people that give out about a free service are just negative people and I bet half them negative people don't have a job
Sorry if this has been touched up on before but who is paying them big dough?
I agree with you, Ifl is top notch but they can't be earning big bucks from youtube hits alone.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 09:26
by Zubrei
You can, if nosey, check out their accounts online at companies house.
I wouldn't bother though, its a small company with a low turn over, that makes a small profit. So basically everything they make, they spend on wages, kit, and expenses. Fair play to them, they may get rich in the future, but at the moment they are just having a good crack.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 09:28
by Glass Joe
forget them to what happened to apollo james jackson
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 10:00
by reggaereggae
Bunce is an egotistical tool, so is Cassius..... Jane Couch by KO I hope
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 10:07
by orbtastic
If the content you upload is yours, then you can monetize the youtube accounts. Granted, you're not going to be the next Smosh or whatever but there is money to be had.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 13:29
by PredatorHayds
Neither come out of this well.
Jane getting aggressive and Kugan not showing enough respect again similar to Chris Eubank. Sometimes as a journo you've just got to take it on the chin and not bite back. The boxers are the ones who pay for his living not the other way around.
Kugan and Helder do a great job though and deserve a lot more respect from the media for the work they do. You can sense the written press still class them as outsiders.
Always liked Jane. Always looked a quality shag after a few Stella's.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 14:27
by TheCobra
PredatorHayds wrote:
Always liked Jane. Always looked a quality shag after a few Stella's.
Whatever floats your boat mate!

Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 14:42
by Eddy
She's coming across as one of those nutty birds. Best thing Kuggs can do is not reply. Hopefully she'll go away lol. You can tell she's proper bitter. All fairness to Kugan, he was put on the spot in that interview with Fury. This is her way of getting back into the spot light (if you can call it that)
Buncey the priick will jump all over this as he's just as bitter. IFltv are 10 times better then his show. He knows it too. He talks all over the fighters. Never lets them finish.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 18:17
by forcefraser
Twitter is a prick of a thing. I`m getting too old as I cannot work it out. I never find half the things people claim are being written on there. It`s all @ bollocks. Can`t make any sense of it.
The interweb is one thing, I can handle that, but Facewank is for young birds and needy old fruits, Instagram and snapchat are a nonce`s paradise and twitter seems just as bad.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 18:41
by stevedoc
forcefraser wrote:Twitter is a prick of a thing. I`m getting too old as I cannot work it out. I never find half the things people claim are being written on there. It`s all @ bollocks. Can`t make any sense of it.
The interweb is one thing, I can handle that, but Facewank is for young birds and needy old fruits, Instagram and snapchat are a nonce`s paradise and twitter seems just as bad.
same here i can't find it . i have two followers and one is buncey yet i don't know how to see the argument
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 27 Nov 2015, 20:21
by Benelio
PredatorHayds wrote:Always liked Jane. Always looked a quality shag after a few Stella's.
That's out of order.... No need for that rogue apostrophe.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 03:13
by Dan Dares
Benelio wrote:PredatorHayds wrote:Always liked Jane. Always looked a quality shag after a few Stella's.
That's out of order.... No need for that rogue apostrophe.

Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 05:58
by sharpei_louis
forcefraser wrote:Twitter is a prick of a thing. I`m getting too old as I cannot work it out. I never find half the things people claim are being written on there. It`s all @ bollocks. Can`t make any sense of it.
The interweb is one thing, I can handle that, but Facewank is for young birds and needy old fruits, Instagram and snapchat are a nonce`s paradise and twitter seems just as bad.
I've never nodded my head more to a post in my life. I was beginning to think I was the mad one and the rest of the world were sane, but thankfully you've given me a glimmer of hope.
Can people not go five minutes on their own anymore without needing 'social interaction'?
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 07:17
by CharlesListon
Glass Joe wrote:forget them to what happened to apollo james jackson
Ha! I was thinking about him the other day. He appeared on facebook as tee-bone and was always claiming to be a 14-0 pro, who needed to remain incognito.
Used to be some great battles between him and Ben Doughty.
I always thought AJJ was medically insane.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 10:14
by samwbr
Couch comes across demented in that spat.
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 10:43
by reggaereggae
CharlesListon wrote:Glass Joe wrote:forget them to what happened to apollo james jackson
Ha! I was thinking about him the other day. He appeared on facebook as tee-bone and was always claiming to be a 14-0 pro, who needed to remain incognito.
Used to be some great battles between him and Ben Doughty.
I always thought AJJ was medically insane.
Sounds like a Apollo Jackson - Charlie Z superfight needs to be made..... I'm sure Eddie and Sky can put it on PPV
Re: Kugan Cassius v Jane Couch
Posted: 28 Nov 2015, 12:29
by handsofstone
sharpei_louis wrote:forcefraser wrote:Twitter is a prick of a thing. I`m getting too old as I cannot work it out. I never find half the things people claim are being written on there. It`s all @ bollocks. Can`t make any sense of it.
The interweb is one thing, I can handle that, but Facewank is for young birds and needy old fruits, Instagram and snapchat are a nonce`s paradise and twitter seems just as bad.
I've never nodded my head more to a post in my life. I was beginning to think I was the mad one and the rest of the world were sane, but thankfully you've given me a glimmer of hope.
Can people not go five minutes on their own anymore without needing 'social interaction'?
x2 ive never been on instagram or facebook in my life and dont intend to,i just started twitter a couple of weeks ago because my mate was insisting it was great to chat with boxers but its ok i suppose but you can never seem to fit in what you want to write
Boxrec will do for me,my only regret is i never joined up sooner