BoxRec

I never believed that team Pacquiao never wanted to fight Adrien Broner,they was just using Broner's name to start conflict.If Pacquiao really wanted to fight Adrien Broner they would have called Al Haymon.Bob Arum talked to BS & he shut down the possibility of a Adrien Broner vs Manny Pacquiao fight,Arum said it ain't gone happen.Broner fired back at Arum,saying his b*tch a** just made because i didn't want to sign with him,when he tried to sell me a dream at his home in LA,at the end of the day Pacquiao is going to do what Bob Arum tells him to do,he will fight a top contender rather than Adrien Broner.

This rumor never made sense to me from the start. Arum obviously wants both ends of Manny's last fight so it's definitely going to be a Top Rank opponent.

But I don't doubt that Arum dropped his drawers to sign Broner at one point. The only thing that Arum loves more than money is....well, he doesn't love anything more than money.

Good, that's a pointless fight.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Good, that's a pointless fight.

But Bradley 3 is much more pointless

Naandrew wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Good, that's a pointless fight.

But Bradley 3 is much more pointless

No way, Bradley is 10 times the fighter Broner is. Not that i want to see pac/Bradley 3.

Naandrew wrote:But Bradley 3 is much more pointless

It's less pointless, but still rubbish.

That is correct bradley has much more ability & skills than broner has,broner dosen't have elite skills & he lacks foot movement.Bradley is more of a competitor & more qualified for a pacquiao fight rather than Adrien Broner.Timothy Bradley has great foot movement an also has faster hands & excellent head movement & he has the defensive skills as well,Bradley also has one of the strongest chins in boxing,Bradley can take several punches,he has never been knockout.How can Broner be qualified for a Pacquiao fight,when he held shawn porter the whole fight & he struggled with guys like Paulie Malignaggi & Emmanuel Taylor.I believe Timothy Bradley are Manny Pacquiao would beat Broner very easily.

I don't care that this ain't happening. Pac would've won every round against Broner with ease.

Not my first choice, but it would beat Berto all to hell.

Tanzio wrote:Not my first choice, but it would beat Berto all to hell.

Berto and Broner might as well be the same fighter.

The Revival wrote:

Tanzio wrote:Not my first choice, but it would beat Berto all to hell.

Berto and Broner might as well be the same fighter.

Good idea! Put them on the undercard.

broner is sooo dangerous, no wonder nobody wants to face him :surprised:

Tanzio wrote:

The Revival wrote:

Tanzio wrote:Not my first choice, but it would beat Berto all to hell.

Berto and Broner might as well be the same fighter.

Good idea! Put them on the undercard.

I've actually wanted to see them fight each other for a while. Just to see who's worse between them. They both have the same weaknesses basically. Slightly different strengths though. As Berto relies mostly on his power, and physical strength and Broner relies mostly on his speed, and what he thinks are tremendous defensive reflexes.

They're both very capable of getting outworked, but Broner more so.

I think Berto would beat Broner if they fought.

The Revival wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

The Revival wrote:
Berto and Broner might as well be the same fighter.

Good idea! Put them on the undercard.

I've actually wanted to see them fight each other for a while. Just to see who's worse between them. They both have the same weaknesses basically. Slightly different strengths though. As Berto relies mostly on his power, and physical strength and Broner relies mostly on his speed, and what he thinks are tremendous defensive reflexes.

They're both very capable of getting outworked, but Broner more so.

I think Berto would beat Broner if they fought.

I disagree, but I would like to find out who is correct.

Bump